Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 69
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Are people really trying to compare 550-580rwhp setups to a 730rwhp setup? That above plot looks damn encouraging with 300rwkws at 5,250rpm and hammer time all the way to 8,500rpm.

And mega fun....

Thanks guys.

Since I do have 5 gears it makes it around the road ok and fun to drive. I will make a few 110 oct pulls but I'm more about street power than were is the race fuel at. :no:

The race fuel result will be interesting.

No E85?

Would be interesting to see a dyno graph using 98 octaine, and E85 or C16 would be impressive.

Curious tho... I wonder how the the graph would compare using a more quality turbo like a HKS T51R SPL or Garrett GT42... Both 1000hp turbos

Tho the HKS T51r apparently spool faster than the Garrett equivalent range, HKS do use Garrett internals and have the most bad ass sounding noise but are a little out dated and cost mega $$$

Thats a twin scroll manifold, is this Precision turbo twin scroll? It doesn't say anywhere on the Precision site that it is...

So surely you would want a Twin scroll turbo for quicker spool time and to match your Full Race manifold, which looks like the Garrett GT45r would be a good match

Edited by HYBR3D

Would be interesting to see a dyno graph using 98 octaine, and E85 or C16 would be impressive.

Curious tho... I wonder how the the graph would compare using a more quality turbo like a HKS T51R SPL or Garrett GT42... Both 1000hp turbos

Tho the HKS T51r apparently spool faster than the Garrett equivalent range, HKS do use Garrett internals and have the most bad ass sounding noise but are a little out dated and cost mega $$$

Thats a twin scroll manifold, is this Precision turbo twin scroll? It doesn't say anywhere on the Precision site that it is...

So surely you would want a Twin scroll turbo for quicker spool time and to match your Full Race manifold, which looks like the Garrett GT45r would be a good match

Yes it's a twin scroll you can get both from Precision.

He's in canada, their 93 octane is our 98 octane.

I'm in the center of the USA.

guys its a Dynojet dyno, you can pretty much take 100hp off that figure comparing to the real dynos, think of it as a engine hp figure not whp.

Here in the states if you don't have a DynoJet you don't have a dyno. Not sure what you have.

Here in the states if you don't have a DynoJet you don't have a dyno. Not sure what you have.

dynojet dynos are junk, its well known the power figures are inflated. they read engine hp not whp.

"you don't have a dyno" lol we make some of the best dyno's in the world my friend. The best american dyno is a Mustang Dyno.

dynojet dynos are junk, its well known the power figures are inflated. they read engine hp not whp.

"you don't have a dyno" lol we make some of the best dyno's in the world my friend. The best american dyno is a Mustang Dyno.

What a ridiculous post, dude. For what its worth, from things I've observed so far in comparisons etc I find the Dynojets one of the most consistant and trust worthy dynos. Yes they read higher than DD (in saying that, there are heaps of people using DD dynos set up to read engine power - the results are coming out quite a bit higher than Dynojet read), but anyone with half a brain can take that into consideration - or just compare the results with other cars on the same kind of dyno,

What a ridiculous post, dude. For what its worth, from things I've observed so far in comparisons etc I find the Dynojets one of the most consistant and trust worthy dynos. Yes they read higher than DD (in saying that, there are heaps of people using DD dynos set up to read engine power - the results are coming out quite a bit higher than Dynojet read), but anyone with half a brain can take that into consideration - or just compare the results with other cars on the same kind of dyno,

thats his original point, the title is RWHP, Guilt-toy is pointing out that it will more likely than not, be reading closer to engine HP.

therefore, not being able to compare to other dynos that are setup up to read WHP.

So no one that posted has half a brain?

Edited by jangles

It was measured @ wheels, its rwhp. The fact that its closer to the engine hp than what a DD would give a reading for makes no difference, further from engine hp doesn't make it more accurate at all - just means its different and I think the collective are pretty offensive to continually slam anyone that runs a different dyno type to the minority here.... especially to the point of calling it junk. I personally feel that compared to MOST dyno brands the DD is the problem child, it reads far enough out from the "average" that it skews the whole ballgame, especially when DD fanbois act like all the others are "wrong" when thats BS.

For what its worth I've seen the odd comparison made between Dynojets and engine dynos and have seen results of 10-20% discrepancy between the number made on the engine dyno versus the DJ chassis dyno. The Dynojet software does NOT inflate anything (well it probably will do a little for SAE/whatever correction, as will DD/Dynapack/another other decent dyno software).

I know damn well Guilt Toy has more than half a brain, which is a good part of the reason I was so incredulous at what he said - this place is about sharing info and I feel that it was quite a "brain disengaged" type of comment to make, this place should be about sharing knowledge, experience and such forth. This guy has what could prove to be very useful "stuff" to share with us, and whether you guys like it or not he is using a dyno which is very likely to be far more proven and respected internationally ((certainly in the US) than DD and thus has really no reason to be treated as though he is an ignoramus for doing so. That kind of culture is what trains people who actually have experience worth sharing and would otherwise be inclined to into shutting up, and letting the empty cans prattle on and propegate misinformation further than it already has - and it clearly frustrates me.

On the other hand, the very thread title is claiming a particular HP, which means that dyno accuracy would make a difference. Not that i disagree with the fact that it really doesn't matter what actual number they put out, aslong as they do so consistantly (i guess you could say i disagree with brandishing a numbe about). Afterall dynos are for tuning cars. What has been done to it, and how it drives, are what is important

Accuracy is not an issue in this case anyway, DJ are really really consistant. How generous (or not) the dyno is the only point worth baring in mind here imho. In anyone's language this car is making a LOT of power, I'd be picking this car would still be making over 500rwkw on a DD dyno. I'm a bit iffy about the spool in this case, though - I'd have hoped to see better on a 2.8.

This thread has turned pointless, considering that here in Australia I can get one dyno reading at shop a then one at shop b and they will be very different, the only true comparison is using the same dyno in the exact same conditions.

If the op had supplied a before and after you probably wouldn't care as much about the end result , more the difference the mods made. I still think that is a nice power figure.

Edited by lilcrash

We just had a factory 2012 Camaro on a few weeks ago made the power GM said it should make 1 hp off.

As for the we part what dynos do you make?? You work for the company or what?

I wouldn'thave a Mustang dyno to many people saying they're wrong in the states nobody likes to hear Mustang numbers high low whatever. I just tune with it sorry if it's not the one you like. :no:

dynojet dynos are junk, its well known the power figures are inflated. they read engine hp not whp.

"you don't have a dyno" lol we make some of the best dyno's in the world my friend. The best american dyno is a Mustang Dyno.

Edited by Weapon X

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • Ok i will get those 310mm. I found one but on a different site. This is the description on those...is it ok? Technical parameters: - Axle: front. - Disc type: ventilated. - Number of holes: 5. - Disc diameter: 310mm. - Total height with center: 54mm. - Thickness (new/min.): 30/28mm. - Designed for brake calipers manufacturer: Sumitomo.
    • You Gregged a whole racetrack!?
    • Look for broken wire or bad connector at the motor. Might not be it, but is worth starting there, as it is easy.
    • Hi everyone, I’m having an issue with my R32 GT-R. Sometimes, when the car goes over a bump or experiences some vibration, the 4WD warning light comes on the dashboard. When I check the code from the control unit in the trunk, it shows Code 19 – ETS Motor. However, everything seems to be working fine — if I turn off the engine and restart the car, the light goes away and everything functions normally. Has anyone experienced this before? Where should I start troubleshooting this issue? Thanks in advance!
    • I'm back from the dyno - again! I went looking for someone who knew LS's and had a roller dyno, to see how it shaped up compared to everything else and confirm the powerband really is peaking where Mr Mamo says it should. TLDR: The dyno result I got this time definitely had the shape of how it feels on the road and finally 'makes sense'. Also we had a bit more time to play with timing on the dyno, it turns out the common practice in LS is to lower the timing around peak torque and restore it to max after. So given a car was on the dyno and mostly dialled in already, it was time for tweaking. Luis at APS is definitely knowledgable when it came to this and had overlays ready to go and was happy to share. If you map out your cylinder airmass you start seeing graphs that look a LOT like the engine's torque curve. The good thing also is if you map out your timing curve when you're avoiding knock... this curve very much looks like the inverse of the airmass curve. The result? Well it's another 10.7kw/14hp kw from where I drove it in at. Pretty much everywhere, too. As to how much this car actually makes in Hub Dyno numbers, American Dyno numbers, or Mainline dyno numbers, I say I don't know and it's gone up ~25kw since I started tinkering lol. It IS interesting how the shorter ratio gears I have aren't scaled right on this dyno - 6840RPM is 199KMH, not 175KMH. I have also seen other printouts here with cars with less mods at much higher "kmh" for their RPM due Commodores having 3.45's or longer (!) rear diff ratios maxing out 4th gear which is the 1:1 gear on the T56. Does this matter? No, not really. The real answer is go to the strip and see what it traps, but: I guess I should have gone last Sunday...
×
×
  • Create New...