Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Just got home from Harris and bit of progress today.

Cams are in without the need for a tunnel bore. Thank god. After 6 hours of messing around with caps the cams turn like a mofo. More work done to the accept an even larger cam if we decide to play around in the future. Relieved for upto 11.5 mm using a 32 mm base circle.

enginebuild009.jpg

Crank got balanced which was something that Mik didn't do back in 2005 when it first went together. The pictures show how far it was out from Tomei.

enginebuild011.jpg

enginebuild012.jpg

Block about to accept it's insides.

enginebuild013.jpg

Girdle just chilling.

enginebuild010.jpg

Tomorrow when my main studs arrive it will be dummied up. Might have to take a bee's dick off the top of the block to get to 9.0:1.

not a wieght thats negligible anyway. I had a set of spool rods and a set of custom CP's and rings all wiegh up to within 0.1 of a gram. The manufacturing tech used these days is heaps better than days of old. Well, unless you are buying 1900 dollar stroker kits for 308's :( Im building one at the moment and its giving me a headache! Told the guy what to buy, he seen the el'cheapo kit and thought it'd be the same as a set of carillo's, KB pistons and a Billet crank for less than half the price lol.

A very well known engine builder was telling me about the tomei kits he has worked with and they have always required some 'tinkering' to get them right on terms of balancing and tolerance setting. No big deal IMO, as long as your engine builder can recognise this need.

HUUUGE update.

Everything is bolted up, torqued down. Thats it, it's all done!

Nitty gritty details of the engine are as follows;

Piston to bore clearence is 2 thou

6 thou deck height with a 35 thou thick (0.9mm) gives a squish of 29 thou (Bobby. A bit tighter than what you said but its close enough)

Comp ratio is smack on 9.0:1

CC of the head is 66 CC

Piston CC is - 12.2 CC

Top ring gap is: 16 thou

Second ring gap is: 18 thou

Mains clearance is: 2.1 thou

Big ends is: 1.88 thou

That little prick the bolt fairy has moved some bolts and nuts!!! :domokun: . Sump to bolt nuts and bolts, oil pump, water pump bolts are MIA! Ordered them all from Nissan on Wednesday and luckily most are in the country. Pick up on Monday morning.

engine026.jpg

engine033.jpg

engine034.jpg

engine035.jpg

engine039.jpg

engine040.jpg

engine041.jpg

engine031.jpg

engine032.jpg

  • Like 1

Also picked up my Nismo intake plenum, AFM delete pipes and my surge tank today. I had them sprayed black because I wanted it to took "stock". Well that sorta changed with the single idea :whistling: .

plenum001.jpg

plenum002.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...