Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I think Piggaz is pulling our leg.....

There's no way he'd pull the pin on this LOL

but then again...

'most people give up just before the finish line' :(

Not pulling anyone's leg mate.

If I put the new box in ill never pull it down. It won't be the last GTR I own, put it that way.

Return to stock, sell the car. All the goodies bolt right onto the later model.

Engine is up for sale if I get offered the right price.

  • Like 1

U can get it in red as I've seen a few around...then u can get RANGA plates!!! That would be fitting

Oh piss off, wog. You should get some lamb horns and cable tie them on the front of the ADM.

  • Like 1

Do like i said man, get 34 and do direct swapage, good shit onto 34, 34 shit on to 33, 33 with 34 shit is worth more then 33 with 33 shit

And dont start whinging about space, i am working on something ATM that will mean i will have the space needed and some

Get OS88, get it into 33 and enjoy till 34 rocks up then swapski

  • Like 1

And engine, box and few suspension arms ain't the end of the world.

That and I can sit on the coin for a while and wait for a car that I want comes up.

Who knows how long that will take.

Not pulling anyone's leg mate.

If I put the new box in ill never pull it down. It won't be the last GTR I own, put it that way.

Return to stock, sell the car. All the goodies bolt right onto the later model.

Engine is up for sale if I get offered the right price.

just buy a an R35 already Paul
  • Like 1

If you do do a swap of the running gear to an R34, then for the love of god pay someone to do it so its not parked in a garage for 6 more months. Passion is lost when too much time passes by.

  • Like 1

As long as you own a GTR, you will be happy. I should have kept my air horns from my gemini back in the 90s...the chicks luved them.

Get a dato 1600 with your running gear, baby GTR - make sure it's red

Edited by Marko R1

Why keep stuffen around, piss the White Whale off and get an EVO, save you a fortune :)

Not all bad I will give you $7k for your OS88, this price is based on the fact that by the time you get it, it will be obsolete :/

Pete, no EVO's. As much as I hate to admit, they're a much faster car, but they do miss a little something that a big fat R has.

An OS 88 and and BIG straight 6 won't exactly fit either ;)

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...