Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Well Scott's did 13.9 with more power. It's getting the barges off the line that counts. I have no doubt he would demolish mine in a roll on.

Hope you can stall it up with boost. Will be fast if you can.

Not likely, it wont even start. lol.

Luckily I got it going to get it off the dyno and onto the car trailer, when I got it home the damn thing was hydro-locked. Off with the heads next week for a check, if all's good I will replace the head gaskets, fit the ARP L19's and try again.

nice work guys, i was planning on running tomorrow but weather is shocking so ill have to wait till a day where its clear lets see waht stock power vs. now 300kw does

Yours will be a very interesting run mate, I wouldn't be surprised if you can get into the 12's with better tyres. Lighten it up as much as you can... :)

  • Replies 179
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Best I could do was back up my 12.3,

Clutch didn't seem to like 300+kW+Drag launches+fat heavy car and is now rather f**ked.

I wont be buying another exedy clutch as it only lasted 9 drag launches and 10k km of fairly sensible street driving most of it on 280kW.

DVS JEZ what would you suggest? Car isn't driven daily and pedal weight is less of a concern but i would like to maintain some feel and not go back to the on/off switch HKS twin plate i had in it.

Edited by numleg

Sounds all to familair.....I have done 2 trips to the drags and done 2 clutches.....both were built by Race clutch

The 2nd one I killed actually had its last day on the street. It fused the carbonic clutch plate to the flywheel

and would not dis-engage. 4200lb single plate

I have just had a complete new clutch and billet flywheel installed. The factory flywheel was in bad shape with a blue heat ring around around the face where the linings ran. Clutch is a NPC this time. Will see how long it lasts...

The car is arount 1650kg

Trap speed was consistantly 185kph+ this should be good for a 12.00 or faster.

best 60 foot time was 1.8

This car won't see track time only street and drag. I have a 180 for track/drift/stupidshit.

I'm looking at what i can get local today otherwise i will order the nismo compermix comp $2200 from RHD Japan delivered isn't too bad but thats still a lot of cash.

My GTR runs an exedy cushion button twin plate. Even my missus can drive it. Has seen alot of abuse and circuit racing.

How much does ur car weigh?

Wht MPH did u run?

Edited by numleg

The car is arount 1650kg

Trap speed was consistantly 185kph+ this should be good for a 12.00 or faster.

best 60 foot time was 1.8

This car won't see track time only street and drag. I have a 180 for track/drift/stupidshit.

I'm looking at what i can get local today otherwise i will order the nismo compermix comp $2200 from RHD Japan delivered isn't too bad but thats still a lot of cash.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...