Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Currently in a bit of a predicament with some owners of a business. Is the above statement true or false?

Car is utilising one of the china rip off gt35r's and OEM compression hasn't been altered to lower it.

I'm only asking due to being made out as a fool on the internet by a business which obviously knows nothing about motors.

The above statement i knew was false just need more people to prove it.

I'm only asking due to being made out as a fool on the internet by a business which obviously knows nothing about motors.

The above statement i knew was false just need more people to prove it.

If a business thinks this is possible then I would be taking my car and myself as far away from them as possible, rather then posting on the internet trying to prove them wrong and making yourself look silly

Sorry, but just telling it like it is.

No appreciate your honesty.. I was trying to tell them myself but everyone was turning it into a big debate for nothing I just hate being told something thats misleading when infact I know the correct information myself.

18psi with OEM "DET" injectors... I find that extremely hard to believe

LOL definitely not out of the question, some china 35r are no more efficient then a rb25 turbo - if the car has any sort of management, and a fuel pump and fpr - with a shitty china 35r its possible

Try telling a business by the name of "XXXXXXXXXX" that.

Edited by Nightcrawler :

Unless you want to be sued for libel/slander (regardless of whether what you say is true or not), DO NOT name businesses in whinge threads.

Lets just clear a few things up here mate.... I am the proprietor of XXXXXXXXXXXXXX and nowhere did I or anyone claim anything about being the master of a DE+T with China 35r as u claim.... ur slanderous bullshit over facebook and now forums is extremely immature and this was reflected in the number of your "friends" who inboxed me just to say u are a f**kwit that thinks he knows all.

All that was stated was that one of the cars we had a hand in the build of (clearly just the suspension aspect) was a rb25de+t NEO that was tuned by a sponsor of many forums including NissanSilvia, and made in excess of 230rwkw with a China GT35R copy, a fuel pump, regulator, DET Injectors, and a Nistune, 18psi and Z32... call bullshit all you like but it has been on a number of dynos with these results mirrored within a couple of HP every time.... the turbo was far from efficient - and made minimal extra power above about 1 bar - but it was able to hit 18psi, before AFR's became cruicial.... the car has since been sold and is still being competed/drifted around QLD in the same way it was built over 18 months ago and has not yet blown up.... for those of you in QLD who are involved in the drift scene, the car is Robby Mounfields old Federal Tyres Sil80, a lot of people who are more than an interstate keyboard jockey could vouch for this car and its build/power figures/credentials.

END OF STORY

Edited by Nightcrawler
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Please ignore I found the right way of installing it thanks
    • There are advantages, and disadvantages to remapping the factory.   The factory runs billions of different maps, to account for sooooo many variables, especially when you bring in things like constantly variable cams etc. By remapping all those maps appropriately, you can get the car to drive so damn nicely, and very much so like it does from the factory. This means it can utilise a LOT of weird things in the maps, to alter how it drives in situations like cruise on a freeway, and how that will get your fuel economy right down.   I haven't seen an aftermarket ECU that truly has THAT MANY adjustable parameters. EG, the VAG ECUs are somewhere around 2,000 different tables for it to work out what to do at any one point in time. So for a vehicle being daily driven etc, I see this as a great advantage, but it does mean spending a bit more time, and with a tuner who really knows that ECU.   On the flip side, an aftermarket ECU, in something like a weekender, or a proper race car, torque based tuning IMO doesn't make that much sense. In those scenarios you're not out there hunting down stuff like "the best way to minimise fuel usage at minor power so that we can go from 8L/100km to 7.3L/100km. You're more worried about it being ready to make as much freaking power as possible when you step back on the loud pedal as you come out of turn 2, not waiting the extra 100ms for all the cams to adjust etc. So in this scenario, realistically you tune the motor to make power, based on the load. People will then play with things like throttle response, and drive by wire mapping to get it more "driveable".   Funnily enough, I was watching something Finnegans Garage, and he has a huge blown Hemi in a 9 second 1955 Chev that is road registered. To make it more driveable on the road recently, they started testing blocking up the intake with kids footballs, to effectively reduce air flow when they're on the road, and make the throttle less touchy and more driveable. Plus some other weird shit the yankee aftermarket ECUs do. Made me think of Kinks R34...
    • I do this, I also don't get the joke  
    • Return flow cooler will be killing you I reckon. You can certainly push more through a low mount setup but they're good numbers for a stock looking engine bay.  Mine made 345rwkw (hub) at 22psi on 98 with a "highflow" on a stock manifold but it's a long way from a normal high flow or standard engine. I used one of those Turbosmart IWG-75's and it was great with the Motec running closed loop boost with pressure being applied to both sides of the diaphragm. 
    • Hey man do you have pic of adaptor plate by any chance I need to match up the bolt holes as my gearbox adaptor plate ones are way off the only bolts of starter motor are matching thanks 
×
×
  • Create New...