Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

L O L I liked the part about "Honestly you should be happy that they actually have the correct equipment and actually heard the detonation."

and "especially when you have allocated 5 hours for a tune..... and not 2 days"

Who could possibly take 2 days to tune a car? Imagine the bill, hi yes that will be 1600$ please oh and great news it made 6kw more!

Not sure if you're serious or taking the piss but you'd be extremely surprised how many tuners DO NOT use knock detection on their dyno. I know of at least 4 in the greater Brisbane area and not only don't use it, but when challenged about it, simply state how good they are they are able to detect knock without the need for a knock detection device.

I can tell you I was very surprised when I also thought I had a good ear for that sort of thing then someone put a headset on me and proceeded to pull 8 degrees of timing out before I could stop hearing it knock. The car made 10rwkw less after that. The customer didn't blow it up.

  • Replies 77
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

I always use knock detectors, even if the ecu has it, its hard to hear knock on certain cars over the engine noise and ecu's arnt always accurate, especially vipecs would read huge knock when there was none and read low knock when I could hear it quite clearly. I know a lot don't use them because half the time there to lazy to clip it on the block or there works to cheap to buy one, also yes a lot of cars can take time on the dyno to sort out bugs, but not something as simple as det.

I also know of a big name workshop here in Adelaide that doesn't use knock detection, I won't ever be getting my car tuned there again as when I hooked up some knock ears and reved out 3rd on a warm day it was detonating like crazy.

Really really slack, PM if you want to know who.

UPDATE:

Picking car up tommorow afternoon, if I have time I will post a dyno sheet.

But because I was only sent an 8psi actuator it didnt make a whole lot of power. I'm just glad they fixed the detonation and got it running correctly.

Needs a new rear muffler though, its partially collapsed.

I also know of a big name workshop here in Adelaide that doesn't use knock detection, I won't ever be getting my car tuned there again as when I hooked up some knock ears and reved out 3rd on a warm day it was detonating like crazy.

Really really slack, PM if you want to know who.

I dunno how these things handle det like that. I freak with the slightest little bit of det and dont push through it.

how accurate is a pwr fc at detecting real knock? or are all computers about the same

I have found they are all different. Some actaully ping at around 35. And some ping after 60.

So without listening and knowing, be carefull

Jez , your knock detection setup is pretty cool and seems to work quite well, not to mention it was probably cheap as. But ill admit at first I had no idea what the hell it was ...

Edited by Mitcho_7

Jez , your knock detection setup is pretty cool and seems to work quite well, not to mention it was probably cheap as. But ill admit at first I had no idea what the hell it was ...

Haha cheers man,iproblem is i spent $900 on the kmon kit and i prefer my new setup as i can hear alot more

Good power but f**k its lean, 12.5:1 =/ no wonder it was pinging lol

I run my own cars at 12.5:1.. never had an issue..... especially as the boost is so low... could go easy 13 depending on engine

I run my own cars at 12.5:1.. never had an issue..... especially as the boost is so low... could go easy 13 depending on engine

I had mine at 12.5:1 pm 19psi dropping to 16 psi making 260kw on a highflowed rb20 turbo on a neo, it also didn't ping which is suprising considering how small the rear housing is.

we detuned to 11.5-12 for safety but you can get away with it if timing is conservative.

Haha cheers man,iproblem is i spent $900 on the kmon kit and i prefer my new setup as i can hear alot more

What is your new setup?

I had mine at 12.5:1 pm 19psi dropping to 16 psi making 260kw on a highflowed rb20 turbo on a neo, it also didn't ping which is suprising considering how small the rear housing is.

we detuned to 11.5-12 for safety but you can get away with it if timing is conservative.

What is your new setup?

Its top secret :)

Maybe i should start tuning lean... Seems no body has been melting motors

Its top secret :)

Maybe i should start tuning lean... Seems no body has been melting motors

It is a street car, I would be nervous running it above 11.5:1 on the track, though I would be dropping the boost level for safety as well.

What are your thoughts on lean + less timing vs rich + more timing? I've heard the japs don't even use AFR they just use exhaust temp and go rich as hell and smash the timing into the motors.

Is your secret method a garden hose? Ear muffs with a microphone wrapped in a rag? cmon spill.

I run my own cars at 12.5:1.. never had an issue..... especially as the boost is so low... could go easy 13 depending on engine

Wow, ile show you a pic of my SR20's piston when I tuned it to 12.5:1, half the side of the piston melted lol was at 18pound though. I'd never tune above 12:1 now.

post-74177-0-08320600-1338073096_thumb.jpg

post-74177-0-99647100-1338073180_thumb.jpg

Edited by 51NNA

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...