Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi all

Getting the good old 100k service soon and thought to myself let's beef up that mid range a little.

We're talking -9's with the basics

My sig tells all.

Now my afms maxed out, but I feel that it should be fine unless I want to go over 300kw.

Basically at the time of the 100k service I was thinking of throwing on some adjustable cam gears and tune adjusted.

Will it be fine you reckon?

Or should I just pull my finger out and call my tuner? Haha.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/401374-lets-talk-mid-range/
Share on other sites

+1 CAM GEARS

my old gtr setup with -7's had the cam gears tuned for midrange rather than outright power, certinaly felt good to drive on the street, especialy around the twisties like nato park etc

im an idiot for not putting cam gears in my new gtr, so im doing that very soon to beef up the midrange aswell

Drop in Tomei type B cams. Add cam gears. If you're thinking about more changes later, may as well throw in an ECU with Map and then not need the AFM's anymore.

Or, the non budget option; stroker motor time.

Lol, I know I want to :S. so exxy

I believe there are a few NISMO AFMs for sale 2nd hand in the for sale section

Straight plug and play with the Nismos, I have Z32s in mine and there is a little caressing to get them in and new plugs ofcourse

which reminds me, i still have my Nismo AFM's ... should probably get around to selling those :D

or you could go MAP sensor - do the numbers on selling AFM's and Power FC, you might find the Link G4(you're Unigroup so i'm going Link) is not much extra at the end of the day

or you could go MAP sensor - do the numbers on selling AFM's and Power FC, you might find the Link G4(you're Unigroup so i'm going Link) is not much extra at the end of the day

You sound like a broken record. You say that so much :D:P

haha, you guys.

Lets crunch some numbers

Nismo afms - US$800 + tune up

SELL

Powerfc - $750

AFMS - $300 (would keep afms for stock air box purposes)

--------------------> $1050 $750

BUY

Powerfc Djetro - $1000

whole new tune + installation - $800 - $1000

-------------------------------------------------------------> $1800

$1800 -

$750

$1100...... extra - tune up. So lets say $800

Or $800 for afms.

Shit, haha. I think Ill just be that looser guy not running map

Edited by Hadouken

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Or just put in a 1JZ, and sell me the NEO head 😎
    • Oh, it's been done. You just run a wire out there and back. But they have been known to do coolant temp sensors, MAP sensors, etc. They're not silly (at Regency Park) and know what's what with all the different cars.
    • Please ignore I found the right way of installing it thanks
    • There are advantages, and disadvantages to remapping the factory.   The factory runs billions of different maps, to account for sooooo many variables, especially when you bring in things like constantly variable cams etc. By remapping all those maps appropriately, you can get the car to drive so damn nicely, and very much so like it does from the factory. This means it can utilise a LOT of weird things in the maps, to alter how it drives in situations like cruise on a freeway, and how that will get your fuel economy right down.   I haven't seen an aftermarket ECU that truly has THAT MANY adjustable parameters. EG, the VAG ECUs are somewhere around 2,000 different tables for it to work out what to do at any one point in time. So for a vehicle being daily driven etc, I see this as a great advantage, but it does mean spending a bit more time, and with a tuner who really knows that ECU.   On the flip side, an aftermarket ECU, in something like a weekender, or a proper race car, torque based tuning IMO doesn't make that much sense. In those scenarios you're not out there hunting down stuff like "the best way to minimise fuel usage at minor power so that we can go from 8L/100km to 7.3L/100km. You're more worried about it being ready to make as much freaking power as possible when you step back on the loud pedal as you come out of turn 2, not waiting the extra 100ms for all the cams to adjust etc. So in this scenario, realistically you tune the motor to make power, based on the load. People will then play with things like throttle response, and drive by wire mapping to get it more "driveable".   Funnily enough, I was watching something Finnegans Garage, and he has a huge blown Hemi in a 9 second 1955 Chev that is road registered. To make it more driveable on the road recently, they started testing blocking up the intake with kids footballs, to effectively reduce air flow when they're on the road, and make the throttle less touchy and more driveable. Plus some other weird shit the yankee aftermarket ECUs do. Made me think of Kinks R34...
    • I do this, I also don't get the joke  
×
×
  • Create New...