Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Car was tuned today, mods are in sig, The spring used was not enough to go above 15psi so will have to return next thursday to up the boost to 18psi

On the road it pulls hard once it hits the midrange, after being used to 200kw, its taking a bit to get used to lol. Hopefully with 18psi it will see 290-300kw.

whats peoples opinions?

post-70965-0-56511400-1338464446_thumb.jpg

post-70965-0-38125900-1338464489_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/401479-opinions-on-my-tune-gtx3076/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 94
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

what is smoothing? it was responding well to boost, started at 210kw at like 10psi, then 250with 14psi so seems a good gain from a few psi,

600NM of torque is pretty good with 15psi ?? its very smooth delivery though, was hoping for a bit more anger in its delivery.

yeah i asked about that, i dont think that dyno is set up for it and was going to be a hassle to adjust, but 120kph is about 3800rpm ,

I bought the wastgate second hand so all i have is a box of springs that arnt labelled, gate was too hot to do a swap. :whistling:

Edited by SliverS2

Went back today for some more boost, amazing what a few psi can do, the car is alot more responsive and fries the rears with ease in second gear, lol

Apparently it wouldnt handle too much timing compared to others so maybe some carbon build up in the motor , i was hoping for an easy 300kw but im very happy with how it drives.

DSC00880

DSC00881

Edited by SliverS2

after opinions on wether it would be good idea to go down to a 0.63housing and add meth injection, the power seems a little bit late and not aggressive enough, did i just select the wrong turbo? or is E85 my answer, i dont really want to sacrifice reliability or rebuild the engine, just after more aggressive power and to hit the 300kw mark.. :whistling:

What rpm are you hitting full boost on? I'm on my phone at the moment so I can't really see the graphs that well...

Wmi/e85 if you can get it could be worth a try, but is that going to give you more response which I assume is what you are after? The .63 rear and e85/wmi will keep you up around the same sort of top end I would think but I'm no expert.

I remember reading about Matt from nistune' r34 gtt making around 290rwkw or possibly more running a gtx3071 in .63 on pulp with poncams.

The thread is over on the nistune forums, but from what i remember reading his car has always made more power than expected from the mods he did.

Edited by Mitcho_7

The .63 rear and e85/wmi will keep you up around the same sort of top end I would think but I'm no expert.

I experienced Mafia's 0.63 + WMI setup. Stronger than mine with 0.87 on pump 98 from 3-4000, but also you could feel the torque rolling off above 6200-ish where mine with the larger housing kept pulling to 7200.

Honestly IMO this result with a 0.8 housing on GT30xx at 19psi is entirely respectable and typical of what power figure to expect. +10kW would be nice but it's within range. The whole GT/GTX thing isn't worth wasting time on. Flow maps shows that the GTX only has a flow advantage at higher PR (boost).

For a more "aggressive" delivery simply lift the head and turbo setup, and install on a RB30 bottom end. Much more impressive day-to-day.

Alternatively, check the existing setup over for integrity, and wind boost up to 22-24psi with the controller setup for the most aggressive rate of boost build that you can. If it fries tyres now, then your local fitters will be seeing you on a monthly basis after that.

Can I suggest forget chasing more power, more power, and target more traction/drive with what you have?

after opinions on wether it would be good idea to go down to a 0.63housing and add meth injection, the power seems a little bit late and not aggressive enough, did i just select the wrong turbo? or is E85 my answer, i dont really want to sacrifice reliability or rebuild the engine, just after more aggressive power and to hit the 300kw mark.. :whistling:

Is yours internal or external gate? Perhaps the wastegate isn't set up correctly or doesn't have enough spring to hold back the manifold pressure? That would make it come on very slow and progressively build boost like on your graph.

If it is, do you have a mac valve? You need to feed boost pressure onto the top port on the wastegate until your controller switches it to the lower port. Which spring did you get and what is the lowest boost pressure you can run?

Have you tried more boost?

KiwiRS4T-The tuner said that he has reached the limits on the 98fuel, he added just one degree more timing and it went from 278 to 285 but he said the knock was climbing too much so for safety he took it back a degree to 278, also said there might be some carbon build up inside because some rb25's can put more timing into them.

Mitcho_7- full boost looks like 4400rpm 18psi, but when its set to 15psi it takes till like 5000rpm to get there,

DaleFZ1- I wouldnt mind rebuilding a strong Rb30 bottem end if it were straight forward swap but reading the rb30/25 looks like it gets expensive very quick.

Scotty- Its external gate, 44mm tial comming off exhaust housing, The tuner set it up, it has one hose going in top and one hose at the bottem, looks like theres heaps of duty to bring it on early, will double check though

The tuner tried all the springs like 5 of them, the low boost setting is .8bar so whatever that spring is .

What would be best/cheapist option for earlier and more aggressive response/power? RB30bottem end? water meth?E85? Housing swap? low mount aftermarket exhaust manifold?

Edited by SliverS2

KiwiRS4T-The tuner said there might be some carbon build up inside because some rb25's can put more timing into them.

WMI can help with cleaning that off from what i have seen and as an added bonus you get more power!

If you go WMI, keep a copy of your current tune so you can revert back to it later on if you decide to ditch the WMI. That way you dont have to pay for another tune.

Edited by Mitcho_7

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
    • It would be different if the sealant hadn't started to peel up with gaps in the glue about ~6cm and bigger in some areas. I would much prefer not having to do the work take them off the car . However, the filler the owner put in the roof rack mount cavities has shrunk and begun to crack on the rail delete panels. I cant trust that to hold off moisture ingress especially where I live. Not only that but I have faded paint on as well as on either side of these panels, so they would need to come off to give the roofline a proper respray. My goal is to get in there and put a healthy amount of epoxy instead of panel filler/bog and potentially skin with carbon fiber. I have 2 spare rolls from an old motorcycle fairing project from a few years back and I think it'd be a nice touch on a black stag.  I've seen some threads where people replace their roof rack delete with a welded in sheet metal part. But has anyone re-worked the roof rails themselves? It seems like there is a lot of volume there to add in some threads and maybe a keyway for a quick(er) release roof rack system. Not afraid to mill something out if I have to. It would be cool to have a cross bar only setup. That way I can keep the sleek roofline that would accept a couple bolts to gain back that extra utility  3D print some snazzy covers to hide the threaded section to be thorough and keep things covered when not using the rack. 
    • Probably not. A workshop grade scantool is my go to for proper Consult interrogation. Any workshop grade tool should do it. Just go to a workshop.
    • In my head it does make sense to be a fuel problem since that is what I touched when cleaning the system. When I was testing with the fuel pressure gauge, the pressure was constantly 2.5 bar with the FPR vacuum removed. When stalling, the pressure was going up to 3.0 bar (which is how it should be on ignition).
    • ECUtalk pages don't mention they support the ABS computer (consult port has more than one CAN), so you might just need a different scan tool. But, I would expect ABS is a different light to the brake warning/handbrake light, do you see an ABS light come on for a few seconds when you turn the key from ACC to IGN? But since you said: I'd have a look at the ABS sensors in the rear hubs to make sure they are not damaged, disconnected etc.
×
×
  • Create New...