Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Car was tuned today, mods are in sig, The spring used was not enough to go above 15psi so will have to return next thursday to up the boost to 18psi

On the road it pulls hard once it hits the midrange, after being used to 200kw, its taking a bit to get used to lol. Hopefully with 18psi it will see 290-300kw.

whats peoples opinions?

post-70965-0-56511400-1338464446_thumb.jpg

post-70965-0-38125900-1338464489_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/401479-opinions-on-my-tune-gtx3076/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 94
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

what is smoothing? it was responding well to boost, started at 210kw at like 10psi, then 250with 14psi so seems a good gain from a few psi,

600NM of torque is pretty good with 15psi ?? its very smooth delivery though, was hoping for a bit more anger in its delivery.

yeah i asked about that, i dont think that dyno is set up for it and was going to be a hassle to adjust, but 120kph is about 3800rpm ,

I bought the wastgate second hand so all i have is a box of springs that arnt labelled, gate was too hot to do a swap. :whistling:

Edited by SliverS2

Went back today for some more boost, amazing what a few psi can do, the car is alot more responsive and fries the rears with ease in second gear, lol

Apparently it wouldnt handle too much timing compared to others so maybe some carbon build up in the motor , i was hoping for an easy 300kw but im very happy with how it drives.

DSC00880

DSC00881

Edited by SliverS2

after opinions on wether it would be good idea to go down to a 0.63housing and add meth injection, the power seems a little bit late and not aggressive enough, did i just select the wrong turbo? or is E85 my answer, i dont really want to sacrifice reliability or rebuild the engine, just after more aggressive power and to hit the 300kw mark.. :whistling:

What rpm are you hitting full boost on? I'm on my phone at the moment so I can't really see the graphs that well...

Wmi/e85 if you can get it could be worth a try, but is that going to give you more response which I assume is what you are after? The .63 rear and e85/wmi will keep you up around the same sort of top end I would think but I'm no expert.

I remember reading about Matt from nistune' r34 gtt making around 290rwkw or possibly more running a gtx3071 in .63 on pulp with poncams.

The thread is over on the nistune forums, but from what i remember reading his car has always made more power than expected from the mods he did.

Edited by Mitcho_7

The .63 rear and e85/wmi will keep you up around the same sort of top end I would think but I'm no expert.

I experienced Mafia's 0.63 + WMI setup. Stronger than mine with 0.87 on pump 98 from 3-4000, but also you could feel the torque rolling off above 6200-ish where mine with the larger housing kept pulling to 7200.

Honestly IMO this result with a 0.8 housing on GT30xx at 19psi is entirely respectable and typical of what power figure to expect. +10kW would be nice but it's within range. The whole GT/GTX thing isn't worth wasting time on. Flow maps shows that the GTX only has a flow advantage at higher PR (boost).

For a more "aggressive" delivery simply lift the head and turbo setup, and install on a RB30 bottom end. Much more impressive day-to-day.

Alternatively, check the existing setup over for integrity, and wind boost up to 22-24psi with the controller setup for the most aggressive rate of boost build that you can. If it fries tyres now, then your local fitters will be seeing you on a monthly basis after that.

Can I suggest forget chasing more power, more power, and target more traction/drive with what you have?

after opinions on wether it would be good idea to go down to a 0.63housing and add meth injection, the power seems a little bit late and not aggressive enough, did i just select the wrong turbo? or is E85 my answer, i dont really want to sacrifice reliability or rebuild the engine, just after more aggressive power and to hit the 300kw mark.. :whistling:

Is yours internal or external gate? Perhaps the wastegate isn't set up correctly or doesn't have enough spring to hold back the manifold pressure? That would make it come on very slow and progressively build boost like on your graph.

If it is, do you have a mac valve? You need to feed boost pressure onto the top port on the wastegate until your controller switches it to the lower port. Which spring did you get and what is the lowest boost pressure you can run?

Have you tried more boost?

KiwiRS4T-The tuner said that he has reached the limits on the 98fuel, he added just one degree more timing and it went from 278 to 285 but he said the knock was climbing too much so for safety he took it back a degree to 278, also said there might be some carbon build up inside because some rb25's can put more timing into them.

Mitcho_7- full boost looks like 4400rpm 18psi, but when its set to 15psi it takes till like 5000rpm to get there,

DaleFZ1- I wouldnt mind rebuilding a strong Rb30 bottem end if it were straight forward swap but reading the rb30/25 looks like it gets expensive very quick.

Scotty- Its external gate, 44mm tial comming off exhaust housing, The tuner set it up, it has one hose going in top and one hose at the bottem, looks like theres heaps of duty to bring it on early, will double check though

The tuner tried all the springs like 5 of them, the low boost setting is .8bar so whatever that spring is .

What would be best/cheapist option for earlier and more aggressive response/power? RB30bottem end? water meth?E85? Housing swap? low mount aftermarket exhaust manifold?

Edited by SliverS2

KiwiRS4T-The tuner said there might be some carbon build up inside because some rb25's can put more timing into them.

WMI can help with cleaning that off from what i have seen and as an added bonus you get more power!

If you go WMI, keep a copy of your current tune so you can revert back to it later on if you decide to ditch the WMI. That way you dont have to pay for another tune.

Edited by Mitcho_7

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Take the value it measured as, and pick the closest range available that is above the reading on the screen.   Also, no point just testing the coils. Read what has been said again. You need to test all your wiring, everything.
    • Does the scanner do all the CUs in the car, or only the ECU?
    • @666DAN sorry to bring you and old thread.     I've got my de+t done and it's all running great other than 1 small issue.    Car has remained auto with the na auto and tcm, I've used a stagea ecu with. NIstune board and everything is great other than my gear selection on the dash. It illuminates park, reverse, neutral, 3rd and 2nd when selected . But nothing when in  drive or what gear your in when you pop it into tiptronic. I'm sure there is maybe 1 wire in the ecu plug I need to move to rectify this. Do ya have any ideas?     Cheers man
    • Well I recently changed my rear axles and was thinking if I bumped anything, I have been driving the car for a while now though... But it has been raining today so everything is wet under the wheel arches. Brakes feel fine and can't hear any of the metal screamers, I had a squeak coming from one of the handbrake drums but that seems to have gone away a while ago. I was going down a hill when it lit up and I did feel the abs bite for a second and question why it did it?
    • Correct. Um. I dunno. I haven't cared enough about the way that the NA cars work to know for sure. But..... The 33/34 turbo manual cars have an electronic speed sensor in the gearbox that outputs a +/- (ie, sawtooth AC) voltage signal. That is connected to the speedo. The speedo then outputs a 0-5v square wave (ie, PWM) signal that the ECU (and any other CU on the bus) sees. The speed sensor is NOT directly connected to the ECU. So here's the problem. Your new ECU expects to see the PWM signal, but must somehow be getting a direct signal from the diff speed sensor. Which would suggest that the wiring of the NA car is not the same as the turbo cars. I think you will need to spend some time with (hopefully the wiring diagram for the car) and a multimeter to see what is connected to what. Then, presuming I am correct**, you would then want to separate the ECU speed signal input from the rest of the car's wiring, and probably either buy a speed signal converter, or build one using an arduino (or similar). That would take in the speed sensor signal and output a scaled (and suitably rearranged) signal for the ECU. ** We shouldn't presume that I am correct here, because there might be something else crazy going on. I don't think you could convert the speedo to be fed from the gearbox sensor, because the pulse rate from that sensor is probably different to the diff sensor and then the speedo would read wrongly. And this also wouldn't fix the ECU's problem either, because the ECU doesn't want to see the gearbox signal direct either (assuming that they are all on the same wiring, for some odd NA related reason, see above caveat!) Does this help? Probably not. Can you make it work? Almost certainly. With the above work. You should buy a handheld oscilloscope from Aliexpress so that you can view these signals directly. Connect up the probes and drive the car. Show photos of the screen when drving at known speeds and connected to different places, and we'll see what we can learn about it.
×
×
  • Create New...