Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

tommis85: with your foot pump hooked up what pressure did the wastegate start to crack open? how much preload have u dialed in (1 full turn is equivalent to 0.8 mm) and as a result what is your peak boost.

Cheers

Linkems,

When I originally hooked it up it cracked at about 5psi and opened from there onwards to be fully open by around 10-12psi.

I wound on about 10mm and it then proceeded to crack/budge at about 10-12psi then gradually open up from about 15psi onwards to be wide open at around 18psi.

I think the 10mm is about enough to counter the actuator spring and also the exhaust gases pushing on the flapper...to make it open at around 15psi when driving as to not boost over 18psi. Obviously my footpump only simulated intake plenum pressure and not exhaust pressure etc etc.

I haven't been able to check peak boost because I don't want to push it that high without tune.

Today, in 3rd I got about 16psi by 4000rpm.....prior tests were only in 1st and 2nd around town where it got around 12psi max at 4000rpm. Today I was also going up slight hill in 80/100 zone.

Hope all that helps a bit ;) I'll probably be able to wind a bit of preload off again with the EBC provided the flapper stays shut long enough till EBC starts feeding a signal to the actuators.

You should try it with a footpump yourself.....I recommend the foot version because you can place it on your strut tower and then gradually pump it or stop halfway thru a pump to see what the actuators are doing. It's also an AWESOME way to get the tightened up rods on and off ;)

thats interesting, it's almost like we are looking at two completely different things. Note i am in the process of fitting brand new 15.6psi actuators to my -7s (already on the car) i'm assuming that -9 and -7 have same physical housing.

with my actuators off the car it takes around 14-15psi to see any movement on the rod. With it connected to to the wastegate i could only dial in 8mm before the rod was minimum length. The start reference point being when the actuator rod just manages to connect onto the wastegate tightly (if you spin it half a turn counter clock wise it will connect to the gate loosely). With 8mm preload it takes the air compressor 22-23psi before the gates even begin to open.

Can you confirm that you are using the same start reference point when you adjusted your preload and also if your actuators have the part number 430819-367 on the sticker. If you find it hard to see the sticker try checking if the last digit ends with a 7 and not a 9.

Edited by linkems

Yep those would be the same ones I have.

I'll go double check the actuators now. I'll also test the gauge to make sure it's not fibbing.

I suppose it is just a sticker. Some monkey out there is in charge of sticking them on and who knows how many he stuffs up :D Or, maybe I was sold a softer pair by someone who just stuck the 430819-367 sticker on.

Linkems, I just checked the actuators again and they crack at piss weak boost. I'm going to send off an email to the fella I bought them from and see if he as any reference material. Looks like yours are performing like they're meant to....they're 15lb units.

dont forget mine are brand new yours probably a bit softer now, but cracking open at 5psi with no or little preload sounds more like my std 8psi actuators. If you find out they are 100% not 15lbs units and want to get a pair pm and i'll link you.

dont forget mine are brand new yours probably a bit softer now, but cracking open at 5psi with no or little preload sounds more like my std 8psi actuators. If you find out they are 100% not 15lbs units and want to get a pair pm and i'll link you.

Nah these buggers were brand new as of 2 weeks ago or so. I bought them with brand new turbos. The interesting thing is that with very little preload these guys will ramp up exponentially in where they crack etc. I'll only be needing 7-8mm of preload and I'll have my 18psi (or more, hence probably having to wind some of it off again)

I guess it just comes down to exactly how the spring is loaded into the canister and what kind it is. It's obviously not loaded in their pre-compressed etc...for all that I know, it's just sitting in there which is why all of them require at least the standard 1.5-2mm worth of preload (ie, half the flapper shaft diameter)

I reckon these will be alright...if I only end up needing like 8mm of preload for now and I have plenty of travel remaining I'll leave them as they are. I want to couple them with an EBC anyway where you want them to open a bit under target boost.

Hey fellas, would anyone be able to compare exactly how the -7's and -9's are? What I know is that the -9's are meant to give a bit more up top which yes, I've already noticed thanks to an f load of lag :D Is it just that the -9's are shifted back in the rpm range with their slightly smaller compressor blades?

Where abouts in the rpm range do the -7's actually pick up and when in the rpm range do they achieve say, 1 bar on an idealy tuned engine?

I'm thinking that 16psi by 4000 is still too laggy for me.

90% of my driving is in the city, so in 60 zones and all of it is under 3000rpm. I'm not liking the fact that the -9's only work properly a whole 1000rpm above where I do 90% of my driving.

So there really isn't much difference at all between the -7's and -9's down low?

Just weighing up all options before I spend another cent on something that I may not be happy with etc. Funny how people will always build something they actually don't want :P

Yeh that's true Piggaz, they're not a stump puller but they DO come on very hard down low with the ceramics, especially with upgraded actuators....I was hoping to not throw toooooo much of this awesome response away with my turbo upgrade.

I'm starting to think I'd rather my 350hp of awesome response and torque than the 400hp of pure lag where I have to stay in a lower gear just to keep with traffic.

Hey fellas, would anyone be able to compare exactly how the -7's and -9's are? What I know is that the -9's are meant to give a bit more up top which yes, I've already noticed thanks to an f load of lag :D Is it just that the -9's are shifted back in the rpm range with their slightly smaller compressor blades?

Where abouts in the rpm range do the -7's actually pick up and when in the rpm range do they achieve say, 1 bar on an idealy tuned engine?

I'm thinking that 16psi by 4000 is still too laggy for me.

90% of my driving is in the city, so in 60 zones and all of it is under 3000rpm. I'm not liking the fact that the -9's only work properly a whole 1000rpm above where I do 90% of my driving.

The -7s aren't 1000rpm better... So what are you asking?

Mine were coming on hard @ 3300rpm, if you ones are not, then you have issues. Anything below 3300rpm is really not going to happen on a 2.6 even with stock turbos really.

Should start a -9 run from 2800rpm really and using 500rpm increments as they should be making 10psi before 3800rpm... Starting @ 3800rpm makes it hard to discern.... Even the above graph isn't great as 4800rpm before 22psi is seen is a bit lazy.

Should start a -9 run from 2800rpm really and using 500rpm increments as they should be making 10psi before 3800rpm... Starting @ 3800rpm makes it hard to discern.... Even the above graph isn't great as 4800rpm before 22psi is seen is a bit lazy.

Agreed. Cam gears next week

Should start a -9 run from 2800rpm really and using 500rpm increments as they should be making 10psi before 3800rpm... Starting @ 3800rpm makes it hard to discern.... Even the above graph isn't great as 4800rpm before 20psi is seen is a bit lazy.

fixed, and yeah that graph can't be scaled right, 20psi at 4800rpm with -9s definitely doesn't sound right

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...