Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  On 16/07/2012 at 9:34 PM, Hadouken said:

Nope, meant cam gears

Ah ok that's what I thought ;) Well I'm definitely going to have to see your results with the gears. I'm not going to touch mine for a while as I need to put in a new front diff first before I can go anywhere near a dyno. It is currently Australias only RWD R33 GTR :)

  On 17/07/2012 at 11:37 AM, Hadouken said:

back in '07 lol

Lol yes that's true but I have read thru it all and it's about GT-SS's which from what I've read are near identical to -9's.

It's funny though...there are many claims across all these forums of what the -9's / GT-SS turbos perform like.

Claims of where full boost of around 20 pounds is reached vary from 3800 to 5700 with the average, especially on my thread, being around 4500rpm (the later sounding quite reasonable) Then there're those who claim that they are more responsive than ceramics, while others claim they're similar to, followed by those who say they're far more laggier and should be avoided. Then, for all these claims we have various dyno plots for cars with similar hardware where one could swear they're all running different turbos haha....that's how varied these -9 results are.

Offcourse, all engines are different....not to mention the skills of the tuners that work with them. I guess I'm just trying to say that it's quite hard to get a proper feel for what these turbos "could" be like.

Here's the difference of standard turbos to -7s on my car. Very few data points but its still instructive. Yes the ceramics spool faster. If you only cared about response, getting steel wheels on the stockers would probably be a good option. Seat of the pants dyno reckoned that clipped turbine high flows i had spooled more like stockers and -7s.

gallery_15274_3730_6060.png

  On 17/07/2012 at 11:55 AM, tommis85 said:

Lol yes that's true but I have read thru it all and it's about GT-SS's which from what I've read are near identical to -9's.

It's funny though...there are many claims across all these forums of what the -9's / GT-SS turbos perform like.

Claims of where full boost of around 20 pounds is reached vary from 3800 to 5700 with the average, especially on my thread, being around 4500rpm (the later sounding quite reasonable) Then there're those who claim that they are more responsive than ceramics, while others claim they're similar to, followed by those who say they're far more laggier and should be avoided. Then, for all these claims we have various dyno plots for cars with similar hardware where one could swear they're all running different turbos haha....that's how varied these -9 results are.

Offcourse, all engines are different....not to mention the skills of the tuners that work with them. I guess I'm just trying to say that it's quite hard to get a proper feel for what these turbos "could" be like.

I agree there is such mixed opinion, as most of you know i could not decide between -9 and -5 for months. Let alone knowing how my -9s are going to actaully perform when complete.

I Read every dyno sheet for both, Even called a handfull of tuners and spoke to them first hand. And that confussed things even more with them saying they could get -5's on just a quick as the -9s and have much more room for top end later.

But yer as much as results vary its to hard to compare them agaist something becasue nothing is standard and everoynes build/Tuner is diffrent.

as long as your happy with your results then i dont see a point in stressing about it. Though if your way below the acg like you are, Then theres a reason for that which more then likey can be fixed.

  On 18/07/2012 at 2:46 AM, sydking said:

I agree there is such mixed opinion, as most of you know i could not decide between -9 and -5 for months. Let alone knowing how my -9s are going to actaully perform when complete.

I Read every dyno sheet for both, Even called a handfull of tuners and spoke to them first hand. And that confussed things even more with them saying they could get -5's on just a quick as the -9s and have much more room for top end later.

But yer as much as results vary its to hard to compare them agaist something becasue nothing is standard and everoynes build/Tuner is diffrent.

as long as your happy with your results then i dont see a point in stressing about it. Though if your way below the acg like you are, Then theres a reason for that which more then likey can be fixed.

Yep that's pretty much how it is. And then there's also those tuners out there who whisper sweet little things in your ear about that they can make anything come on lightning quick and then stop talking to you as soon as you handed over your dough :no: Some of these places have no shame or pride in what they do - simply in it for the money and just give you lip service till they get it.

One more thing you can throw into the mix is hybrid versions of these turbos - like, in my travels I came across a set of 2530's with bigger compressor wheels and competition split dumps for the price of new -9's. They probably would have been good but you gotta always ask yourself why they were selling them for if they were so "fantastic" etc.

  On 18/07/2012 at 1:33 AM, MrStabby said:

Here's the difference of standard turbos to -7s on my car. Very few data points but its still instructive. Yes the ceramics spool faster. If you only cared about response, getting steel wheels on the stockers would probably be a good option. Seat of the pants dyno reckoned that clipped turbine high flows i had spooled more like stockers and -7s.

Yeh well I was looking at those steel wheel kits you can buy before the -7's caught my fancy. A set of steel wheeled stockers with some extra preload on them and EBC would be mental through a mountain pass!! Anyone who's still running ceramics should realy throw on some adjustable actuators and brace themselves :P

Yeh mate, I think in the 7 years I've had these cars with all sorts of turbo combos I think I'm more of a response man. The lag is all cool when you want to impress your mates but at all other times I personally just find it a pain in the ass. Big singles with their light switch on/off delivery are much more fun for that anyway.

  • 2 weeks later...
  On 20/07/2012 at 11:46 PM, tommis85 said:

Yeh well I was looking at those steel wheel kits you can buy before the -7's caught my fancy. A set of steel wheeled stockers with some extra preload on them and EBC would be mental through a mountain pass!! Anyone who's still running ceramics should realy throw on some adjustable actuators and brace themselves :PFor a explosion

  On 30/07/2012 at 6:49 AM, Hadouken said:

Yes true true :)

However, not that I recommend this....but.....I was running my ceramics at a minimum of 15 pounds for 4 years and last year I ran them up to 18 pounds for shits and giggles. I studied up on the causes of the "explosion" and made sure I didn't do what is the biggest contributor to it, ie, shutting off the turbos while they're literally red hot (the theory of the ceramic wheel shrinking faster than the metal shaft thus micro-fracturing the turbine wheel's hub over and extended period of time)

They've also been thru numerous track and dyno days (and that is racing, not putter around happy laps style)

Right now they're sitting on my shelf and they have no play in either axis....and spin as good as any journal bearing type turbo. Offcourse, it could also be that I have a very well manufactured, faultless set of turbine wheels....ceramic's manufacture process was definitely not a reliable / consistent one 17 years ago.

It would be interesting to find out exactly how many of these units have failed and under what circumstances...and, what led up to it.

Hmm not sure right now - may have to check but, it would still support the theory as the shaft, being the shape it is will cool down a lot slower than the exhaust wheel vanes with their massive surface area. It was a pretty good write up...and would explain why they can shatter at as little as "8 pounds worth" of RPMs (whatever that equates too).

But either way. As far as the topic goes....I'm still sitting here with lag monsters haha - need to get at least the rear diff sorted so I can do a proper dyno run without lighting up on the less loaded side GRRRRRRR!! Not happy Jan....not happy at all about all this. :verymad:

It would be an advantage if the shaft was ceramic (I'm not sure, I've never taken one apart), as it wouldn't transfer heat from the exhaust wheel to the compressor where a metal shaft would.

  On 30/07/2012 at 9:05 PM, Hadouken said:

I was under the impression that heat and high rpm was the killer

Yep and age, and its pretty much always the rear that goes. I'm guessing that's either to due to the plenum pushing a bit more air into #6, or the PCV venting to the rear turbo, or both.

My ceramic turbine broke off flush with the housing, so yeah its all ceramic.

  On 31/07/2012 at 4:46 AM, MrStabby said:

Yep and age, and its pretty much always the rear that goes. I'm guessing that's either to due to the plenum pushing a bit more air into #6, or the PCV venting to the rear turbo, or both.

My ceramic turbine broke off flush with the housing, so yeah its all ceramic.

Did it go to the cat or get sucked back in?

  On 31/07/2012 at 6:39 AM, cobrAA said:

with all the new turbos ( i.e: bilelt technology) arent the -9 outdated in the way that you can get the same response but with better power?

Show an example

Have you installed your turbos yet sydking?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • just an update to this, poor man pays twice  Tried sanding down the pulleys but it didnt do the trick. Chucked another second hand alternator in the na car which I got for free off my mate and its fixed the squelling. Must have been unlucky with the bearings.    As for my turbo car, I managed to pick up a cwc rb alternator conversion bracket + LS alternator for 250 off marketplace, looked to be in really good nick. Installed it , started the car and its not charging the battery.... ( Im not good with auto elec stuff so im not sure if this was all I needed to do but I verified such by using a multimeter on the battery when the engine was running and I was only getting 12.2v )   I had to modify the earth strap for the new LS alternator , factory earth strap was a 10mm bolt which did not fit the bolt on the LS alternator which was double the size so I cut it off , went to repco bought some ring terminals that fit, crimped it onto the old earth strap and bolted it up to the alternator , started the car and same issue. Ran like shit and was reading 12.2 at the battery.  For a "plug and play" advertised kit thats not very plug and play but alas.  My question is , am I missing something ? Ive been reading that some people recommend upgrading the stock 80 amp alternator fuse to a 140 amp but I dont see how that would stop the alternator charging especially at idle not under load.  Regardless ive pulled it out and am going to get it bench tested by an auto elec tomorrow but it would be handy to know if ive missed something silly or have done something wrong.   
    • My wild guess is that you have popped off an intake pipe....check all of the hoses between the turbo and the throttle for splits or loose clamps.
    • Awesome, thanks for sharing!
    • To provide more specific help, more information is needed. What Android screen? What is its wiring diagram? Does the car's wiring have power at any required BAT and ACC wires, and is the loom's earth good?
    • So, now all you need to do is connect the 2 or 3x 12v feeds into the unit to permanent 12v, ACC 12V and IGN 12V that you can find in the spot behind the stereo, and the earth, and then it will switch on with the car.
×
×
  • Create New...