Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 103
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Rob,

Thats a bloody good power band. At 4500rpm your making 223rwkw and it keeps nice and fat up top too.

I'd say with a set of cams in that power band will look even meaner. Give me a go at it next time at the drags mate and I'll get the bastard to do a mid 11 for ya :)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/40865-average-power/#findComment-838330
Share on other sites

I'm not sure what range SK usually uses to get the average power figure.

I suspect it would be somewhere around the ~3000 to ~7000 range.

One thing, if your going to start comparing average powers, make sure you use the same range and the same amount of points so the equation is the same.

Looks tough though, how do you go with traction as it goes from about 170rhp to ~280rhp in 500rpm.

J

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/40865-average-power/#findComment-838348
Share on other sites

With 265 rubber on the back traction is still an issue, its only cheap rubber I want to put some decent rubber on when I put the other 2 18" rims I've got on. I've yet to give it full throttle in any gear yet, wheelspin in 2nd and 3rd as boost comes on quickly havent gone too hard in 4th. Really need to get down to the motorplex and give it a run down the 1/4.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/40865-average-power/#findComment-838903
Share on other sites

Hi guys, the concept of average power is to calculate the power the engine generates as you change up through the gearbox. Since the first to second gear ratio change is the most wide spread in a Skyline box, I use the rpm drop on that gearchange. Usually around 3,000 rpm is the drop first to second, second the third is around 2,500 rpm, third to fourth around 2,000 rpm and fourth to fifth around 1,500 rpm. My next step is to choose the highest rpm I want to use and them subtract 3,000 rpm. I then take the power at 500 rpm increments and divide it by 7, the result is the average power from 4,000 rpm to 7,000 rpm.

So let's do rob77's car;

7000 337

6500 364

6000 357

5500 345

5000 330

4500 290

4000 161

Average 312

Knore said

no point going over 6500rpm in gear changes tho as the power drops off

But if I do the average power calcs using 6,500 rpm as the max;

6500 364

6000 357

5500 345

5000 330

4500 290

4000 161

3500 113

Average 280

So I would most certainly recommend using 7,000 rpm, at least in first gear as it results in a higher average.

Hope that helps

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/40865-average-power/#findComment-842474
Share on other sites

I remember SK talking about average power a while back. This is my latest dyno chart, 1.2bar wasnt tried as it seems the turbo is running out of puff and/or the stock exhaust manifold is restricting its flow. Can anyone tell me what the average power is?

Hi rob, having explained average power, I will try and answer your questions;

Personally I don't think the turbo or the exhaust manifold is the problem at the moment. My experience has been that the standard camshafts are the most likely first limiter over 250 rwkw. They simply don't have enough lift or duration to let the air into the engine. Sure you can turn the boost up and try and squeeze some more air in, but you will get higher inlet air temps and lower efficiency.

Plus it will do nothing to smooth out that big jump in horsepower (113 at 3,500 rpm and 290 at 4,500 rpm) that I would find most difficult to drive through.

So I would recommend a pair of Tomei Poncams 256 degrees that are designed to work with the VVT. Obviously they will help the the engine breath better in that 6,000 rpm to 7,000 rpm range that you currently have a drop off in power. But my experience has been that they will also bring on the boost around 500 rpm earlier.

What I would expect is around a 50 bhp increase at 3,500 rpm and a 30 bhp increase at 7,000 rpm and about 20 bhp everywhere in between. Even off boost we see a power increase from fitting these camshafts. It is worth remembering that Tomei seem to get the timing pretty much spot on, so an adj exhaust camshaft pulley is not necessary.

All of the above is dependant on your tuner understanding the concept of increasing the average power, not simply aiming for more max power at one rpm point.

Hope that helps some more

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/40865-average-power/#findComment-842475
Share on other sites

Wouldn't torque be a better measure of the average output of your engine? As power is simply a product of torque and (sort of) rpm, isnt torque a better measure of the ability of your car to speed up, being rpm independant? Or is the average power just a figure for people who like to have a power figure to quote?

Im probably wrong though.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/40865-average-power/#findComment-842505
Share on other sites

GTST Vspec has 330rwkw on standard cams and its only the fuel pump holding it back so dont blame cams.
:bs!:

Are they both using the same turbo's?

Obviously if a turbo is at the edge of its efficiency then a set of cams will do wonders, cams reduce the amount of boost required to flow x amount of air.

To make more power you can either use a larger laggier turbo or start looking in to improving air flow in to the pots.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/40865-average-power/#findComment-842698
Share on other sites

Choice... very impressive... that power it nothing to laugh at... You have half of the right mods already. Forged pistons check, FMIC check, Exhaust Check & nice turbo. What i dont see as impressive is a wolf3d computer... Sorry but when i worked in auto electronics we used those on Gemini's and Escorts... Older Map sensor driven motors like the 2l twin cam ISUSSO (howeva u spell it) anyways... I believe out of personal experience, your greatest power gain is gonna come through 4 things... (not gonna say which one is best, as all four applied together is the way to go)

1. ECU (suggest Microtech)

2. Cams (suggest JUN or any of the good aftermarket ones, just select carefully on cams as some will provide great top end and some will provide great bottom end. Remember the standard ones are sort of all range. So get loads of advice before sinking into a certain set.)

3. AFM unit (Z32 or larger, standard afm's can only measure a certain amount of flow)

4. Fuel system (back to front, ie. Pump, surge tank, fatter lines, preasure reg, injectors)

Never the less these 4 bits (parts & labour) are gonna cost a pretty penny.....

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/40865-average-power/#findComment-842766
Share on other sites

Oh.... Almost forgot...

You were talking about tyres... Yep did these research a few months ago...

Meet a really smart bloke from CAT racing, works on the V8's anyways. Yes you do need a good suspension setup to obtain good use of tyres. There are a couple of ways to look at it.

1. I have the best suspension setup in the world and use $50 tyres...

2. I have a standard suspension setup and use $500 tyres....

3. I spent about $1200 on new springs and shocks (in a rep brand, ie I bought TEIN) and i buy good safe road tyres (ie. Bridgestone Donuts) $160 per tyre....

Now i have had all three of these setups over my last couple of skylines (all the same model) so i can tell you my last skyline which had option number 3 was the best handling of them all....

I will also go on to note that alot of people go on about $300 tyres and how good they are. Well i agree, $300 tyres are fantastic, but value for money over a Australian re-searched and made tyre (designed for our rough, course, dry, wet, bumpy roads) is not so great. So i took the advice on board and bought a set and they are now 2 years old and the fronts are now due for replacement. The $320 yoko's i used last time felt a bit better but only lasted 4 months...

Hope you under stand..

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/40865-average-power/#findComment-842772
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...