Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

just wondering if its worth me goin for a forward facing plenum to try and lower lag on the setup i'm startin to install of a gt3540 turbo on low mount with external gate and screamer pipe with nistune board and fuel system coming in the next few weeks? All advice is appreciated as I'm fairly new to rbs

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/409949-forward-facing-plenum/
Share on other sites

More to the point is what exhaust housing have you got on the GT3540? I think you'll be scratching to fit a GT3540 on a low mount (not saying it can't be done). Have you got an RB25DET or have you put a 30 block on it? What is your power goal? I would say the GT35/40 is too big for an RB25 and bound to lack response. I have an RB3540 with a .63 exhaust housing on my RB30/25 and I don't notice any lag.

If your power target is 300kw or below there's no need to change the inlet manifold. I guess you know a screamer pipe is illegal most places.

Thats way overkill for 250+kw

Neo highflow will max out at about 260 and be waaaaaaay more responsive than the 3540

In the fat lard that is a stagea you will probably find response makes them faster than absolute power

Use it nothing wrong with 3540 on a 25 with the right supporting mods, injectors, aftermarket ECU, exhaust etc good for 265rwkw. run on E85 and 1 bar 350+rwkw. It's a real hassel to mount on low manifold.

We've been running a few 3540's on RB's for ages, we use .86 housing on top mount manifold with FFP, gate to atmos, 3." exhaust, flip the intercooler upsidedown and the piping is a total of <1m. lag is adjusted via clutch pedal.

25, 26 & 30's.

I guess its a cheap Ebay turbo. However for 250kw you should just get Hypergear to highflow your turbo then you won't have any installation hassles. If you want more power a GT3076 will low mount with a 10mm spacer and make 300kw on 98 or more on E85 if you want later and be much more responsive than a GT35/40.

you are quite misinformed about both hypergear and kinugawa

hypergear makes his own stuff, yes he doesn't use ball bearings he uses bush bearings

but i doubt that you will find a manufacturer that will back up his product as much as stao, he has even taken his old turbo bought second hand and updated them to the latest spec for about $400

kinugawa also uses mitsubishi chra's and stuffs them into his own housings afaik

both are well founded and have low to no reliability issues

stao is constantly testing on his rb25 so his turbo's are perfect for them, he knows what works and if you talk to him about what you want he will make sure to deliver something that performs how

you want it

also, you can get cheap dodgey ebay 35/40's so kiwi's response was valid

back on topic, the long inlet runners of the stock over-the-top intake manifold give good low-midrange torque

its well documented on this forum that front facing manifolds loose this torque are rarely increase top end, but they do help tidy up the engine bay and make the piping shorter when running a fmic

if you went ff plenum and the 3540 you will not decrease lag as plenum design is much more important than the frictional resistance of a metre of pipe

Yeah def misinformed as stated above stao makes his own with more back to back testing than you want to know about.. and kinugawas do use mitsi internals , got one in the shed. fitting a 3540 low mount hmmmm my 3076r only just squeezes in from looking when we where stuffing around with my mates 35 40 you will have no room. for the power your looking for there are heaps more viable turbo options than that even if you get power hungry much more responsive mid 300s are quite capable out of much more suitable turbos . have nothing against the good old 3540 used one with a .82 on my vl. much better suited to a 3L engine . and yeah save the coin from a ffp not needed till much bigger kws unless ya just want engine bay.to look lot cleaner.

I assumed you had an ebay turbo because to my knowledge the Garrett GT3540 come with 0.63 (mine) 0.82 or 1.06 exhaust housings whereas the cheap knockoffs come in a variety of a/rs. In any case pretty sure you won't be able to low mount one. Mine only just fits with my custom high mount:

002-2.jpg

I Have an ffp, not for power only to tidy up the engine bay and make it easier to change the plugs, but it will be a bastard to get to the cold start etc.

Also, and I believe it is a common problem that it gets the gurgles once the oil temp gets over 100. I will soon fit the oil cooler to see if that solves the problem

ntohing wrong with kinugawa, i just sold my r33 skyline with a kinugawa T67, it made 255rwkw, and the auto died, only got to tune it @ 17psi on bp98, and we suspect the gearbox was slipping the whole time it was on the dyno before it went. the setup should have easily seen 300+ on 20psi... and around 350rwkw on E85, which has been proven time and time again on this forum without failure so far.

i am aiming at around 250-260rwkw @17-18psi in my c34. i have so far done FMIC, walbro fuel pump + direct 12v feed mod, sard 650cc injectors, still to come z32 afm, coilpacks( not really neccesary), hypergear highflowed op6 neo turbo, and nistune.

as for hypergear, trent from status(chequered) tuning tunes my cars, and he will back hypergear turbos, he never used to when stao first started because they werent quality, but the way they are built nowdays, he has no issues tuning with the, nor testing them for stao at hypergear, and he is one hell of a tuner with a very good reputation.

Edited by OMY31T

I think u'll find a 3540 way to big to be practical in a stagea. With stags being so heavy it will fairly laggy with a 25. The idea of clutch kicking to get rid of lag might work for cop bait morons in rwd skylines, but with and awd stagea ur just gonna keep burning out clutches or breaking stuff. For your power goal id go way smaller. even a 3071 is more than ud want. Save your 3540 for a big $$$$$ dirty 30!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...