Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

just wondering if its worth me goin for a forward facing plenum to try and lower lag on the setup i'm startin to install of a gt3540 turbo on low mount with external gate and screamer pipe with nistune board and fuel system coming in the next few weeks? All advice is appreciated as I'm fairly new to rbs

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/409949-forward-facing-plenum/
Share on other sites

More to the point is what exhaust housing have you got on the GT3540? I think you'll be scratching to fit a GT3540 on a low mount (not saying it can't be done). Have you got an RB25DET or have you put a 30 block on it? What is your power goal? I would say the GT35/40 is too big for an RB25 and bound to lack response. I have an RB3540 with a .63 exhaust housing on my RB30/25 and I don't notice any lag.

If your power target is 300kw or below there's no need to change the inlet manifold. I guess you know a screamer pipe is illegal most places.

Thats way overkill for 250+kw

Neo highflow will max out at about 260 and be waaaaaaay more responsive than the 3540

In the fat lard that is a stagea you will probably find response makes them faster than absolute power

Use it nothing wrong with 3540 on a 25 with the right supporting mods, injectors, aftermarket ECU, exhaust etc good for 265rwkw. run on E85 and 1 bar 350+rwkw. It's a real hassel to mount on low manifold.

We've been running a few 3540's on RB's for ages, we use .86 housing on top mount manifold with FFP, gate to atmos, 3." exhaust, flip the intercooler upsidedown and the piping is a total of <1m. lag is adjusted via clutch pedal.

25, 26 & 30's.

I guess its a cheap Ebay turbo. However for 250kw you should just get Hypergear to highflow your turbo then you won't have any installation hassles. If you want more power a GT3076 will low mount with a 10mm spacer and make 300kw on 98 or more on E85 if you want later and be much more responsive than a GT35/40.

you are quite misinformed about both hypergear and kinugawa

hypergear makes his own stuff, yes he doesn't use ball bearings he uses bush bearings

but i doubt that you will find a manufacturer that will back up his product as much as stao, he has even taken his old turbo bought second hand and updated them to the latest spec for about $400

kinugawa also uses mitsubishi chra's and stuffs them into his own housings afaik

both are well founded and have low to no reliability issues

stao is constantly testing on his rb25 so his turbo's are perfect for them, he knows what works and if you talk to him about what you want he will make sure to deliver something that performs how

you want it

also, you can get cheap dodgey ebay 35/40's so kiwi's response was valid

back on topic, the long inlet runners of the stock over-the-top intake manifold give good low-midrange torque

its well documented on this forum that front facing manifolds loose this torque are rarely increase top end, but they do help tidy up the engine bay and make the piping shorter when running a fmic

if you went ff plenum and the 3540 you will not decrease lag as plenum design is much more important than the frictional resistance of a metre of pipe

Yeah def misinformed as stated above stao makes his own with more back to back testing than you want to know about.. and kinugawas do use mitsi internals , got one in the shed. fitting a 3540 low mount hmmmm my 3076r only just squeezes in from looking when we where stuffing around with my mates 35 40 you will have no room. for the power your looking for there are heaps more viable turbo options than that even if you get power hungry much more responsive mid 300s are quite capable out of much more suitable turbos . have nothing against the good old 3540 used one with a .82 on my vl. much better suited to a 3L engine . and yeah save the coin from a ffp not needed till much bigger kws unless ya just want engine bay.to look lot cleaner.

I assumed you had an ebay turbo because to my knowledge the Garrett GT3540 come with 0.63 (mine) 0.82 or 1.06 exhaust housings whereas the cheap knockoffs come in a variety of a/rs. In any case pretty sure you won't be able to low mount one. Mine only just fits with my custom high mount:

002-2.jpg

I Have an ffp, not for power only to tidy up the engine bay and make it easier to change the plugs, but it will be a bastard to get to the cold start etc.

Also, and I believe it is a common problem that it gets the gurgles once the oil temp gets over 100. I will soon fit the oil cooler to see if that solves the problem

ntohing wrong with kinugawa, i just sold my r33 skyline with a kinugawa T67, it made 255rwkw, and the auto died, only got to tune it @ 17psi on bp98, and we suspect the gearbox was slipping the whole time it was on the dyno before it went. the setup should have easily seen 300+ on 20psi... and around 350rwkw on E85, which has been proven time and time again on this forum without failure so far.

i am aiming at around 250-260rwkw @17-18psi in my c34. i have so far done FMIC, walbro fuel pump + direct 12v feed mod, sard 650cc injectors, still to come z32 afm, coilpacks( not really neccesary), hypergear highflowed op6 neo turbo, and nistune.

as for hypergear, trent from status(chequered) tuning tunes my cars, and he will back hypergear turbos, he never used to when stao first started because they werent quality, but the way they are built nowdays, he has no issues tuning with the, nor testing them for stao at hypergear, and he is one hell of a tuner with a very good reputation.

Edited by OMY31T

I think u'll find a 3540 way to big to be practical in a stagea. With stags being so heavy it will fairly laggy with a 25. The idea of clutch kicking to get rid of lag might work for cop bait morons in rwd skylines, but with and awd stagea ur just gonna keep burning out clutches or breaking stuff. For your power goal id go way smaller. even a 3071 is more than ud want. Save your 3540 for a big $$$$$ dirty 30!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
    • Yes they do. For some maybe. But for those used the most by abusers, ie Skylines, the numbers are known. The stock eyebrow height for R32/3 Skylines is about 365/375mm or thereabouts. The minimum such heights are recorded in adjacent columns in the database.
×
×
  • Create New...