Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Marussia have confirmed Ferrari as their new engine supplier with the Italian manufacturer providing them 1.6-litre V6 turbocharged power units from 2014.

http://www.planetf1.com/driver/18227/8826186/Marussia-confirm-Ferrari-tie-up

I am pumped. Dan has been called up to test the RBR at Silverstone. Lets hope he can seal the deal and we see another Aussie in a top seat next year

Joe Saward seems to think its the wrong choice fro RBR and they should be looking at JEV.

Also interesting to see Coughlan has left Wiliams and Pat Symonds has signed up. SO many changes cant be good for Williams but hopefully Symonds can convince Maldanado to bin it and get Bottas in a good spot after a safety car

Anyone keen for the new F1 game to come out? Thought I'd bring it up in the Formula 1 thread because I think its the most likely place to find people who buy/play F1 games ;)

maybe, so long as it was a dedicated computer game not an awful xbox/ ps port

last F1 game I bought was Geoff Crammond's Grand Prix 4

I am pumped. Dan has been called up to test the RBR at Silverstone. Lets hope he can seal the deal and we see another Aussie in a top seat next year

Joe Saward seems to think its the wrong choice fro RBR and they should be looking at JEV.

Also interesting to see Coughlan has left Wiliams and Pat Symonds has signed up. SO many changes cant be good for Williams but hopefully Symonds can convince Maldanado to bin it and get Bottas in a good spot after a safety car

good to hear Disco D. has been given an opportunity as I think he has deserved it so far. Whether RBR see him in the seat next season will be another story.

I'll more than likely buy the new F1 game for PS3 (have bought the last 2 years) but planning to get a decent cockpit setup as well...Playing with the controller isn't much chop

by the GT steering wheel then!

I have the driving force GT Pro. Its pretty good for F1 actually. I think the G27 would be a little wasted (but still good) on F1 games. At the moment I dont have my wheel setup since I moved house and went back to controller. But I cant drive the cars more then 3 laps without crashing lol.

Disco Dan had his test with STR and RBR yesterday clocking 1st and 3rd fastest times with one small off.

The times look pretty good compared to this years race times so a few eyes will be on SebVet today to see how his times look by comparison.

Disco Dan had his test with STR and RBR yesterday clocking 1st and 3rd fastest times with one small off.

The times look pretty good compared to this years race times so a few eyes will be on SebVet today to see how his times look by comparison.

Looks the goods, wonder how much cheaper Kimi he would be....

If I pull the trigger on a cockpit I'd go all out and get the G27

I love my g27 but it's old tech now. The pick of the new units is the Thrustmaster t500. Feeling extra rich add the F1 wheel .

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...