Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Ok i emailed both Racepace and Race Radiators.

Racepace can supply a 42mm triple pass (N Flow) radiator that supports the shroud and clutch fan. They only do them for the R32 - R34. So an R33 item must be used with custom mounting. This is $550.

They don't really offer anything bigger as they came to the conclusion a 42mm rad is adequate on high powered circuit cars.

Racepace's opinion is that the factory clutch fan / shroud setup is better than any thermo fan even on a track vehicle.

Race radiators offer a 42mm single row, 55mm 2 row crossflow and a 65mm 2 row cross flow. They do not supply a bolt in for the R31.

Their recommendation is that the 42mm with the factory clutch fan and shroud is only suitable for street dutes. For race use they use the 55mm and 65mm coupled with a thermo fan without shrouds. 55mm unit is $750 and the 65mm unit is $850.

So a bit of price difference and recommendation difference as well :/

  • Replies 172
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Dan if RacePace say that their 42mm radiator is adequite for track duties... i would take their word on it...

the amount of GTR's that get tracked coming out of Racepace is rediculous

sounds to me as if someone is trying to sella bigger more expensive radiator

Thanks Joe.

You run a racepace radiator as well yeah?

Well to be honest, i'm happy to spend the money on a quality radiator for XX size and features that i need to effectively control the water temperature.

The thermo fan vs clutch fan debate is kind of annoying. I think i'll stick with the clutch fan way unless i simply do not have enough room to accommodate it anymore. And with anything thicker than a 42mm rad, i wont be able to. 42mm is going to be tight as it is and i must confirm if it will still fit.

Yea mate im running a Racepace radiator now, after talking to a few people about the track duties that some Racepace cars have had i was convinced.

Chris also informed me that the Clutch fan is the way to go...he also went on to tell me that they have tested both clutch and thermo fans back to back...

the results were the clutch fan lost about 5kw to run..though after switching to the thermos the heat soak went on to lose even more power then the clutch fan becasue it just wasnt cooling efficently.

post-47556-0-37975300-1358317257_thumb.jpg

looks good i reckon.. all polished up :D

Nice nice.

Have you really given yours a hammering at the track for extended periods?

Which fan are you using? The older style straight bladed or the new style angle bladed more efficient fan?

Shroud all mounted up sweet?

I havent had a chance to get my Radiator a good thrashing yet, it will be getting one soon though..

i have the angled blades on my fan.

shroud fits up nice and neat, thought the bottom of mine is a bit floppy as the shroud was damaged so i hacked at it

  • 4 weeks later...

Back a bit I was talking about how not running heat exchanger left me with super cool oil- like winter at 100km/h i was getting to 50 degrees, and summer flat out getting to 70 in heavy traffic.

I now have exchanger hooked up and with 35-40 degree weather, water sits on 78-85 and oil is always very close, down to 70-75 on freeway.

Im hoping this wont give me the shits on the track if oil gets too hot. Just FYI

I'd suspect the thermostat of not closing off enough. Should at least be able to keep the oil as hot as the coolant (unless big sump with wings and fins and shit).

It does keep very hot now its got water back to exchanger. was always cold without exchanger. I run 7.5L of oil but no fins etc. Thermostat seems to work, plus its only new

It does keep very hot now its got water back to exchanger. was always cold without exchanger. I run 7.5L of oil but no fins etc. Thermostat seems to work, plus its only new

The test for that would be to take the water off the HX again and connect the oil lines together at the core (bypassing the core). If the thermostat IS working, then you should get the same sorts of temps you were getting before. If it's passing oil when it shouldn't, then you'd get a nice increase.

Well the hel kit doesnt totally seal of the cooler, its an open bypass, so oil will still very slowly run in cooler, when thermostat gets to 70 degrees, it seals bypass off making all oil pass through the cooler... And when I say it ran very cold around the 50 mark, but thats in winter here at -5 to 5 degrees at night.. This winter will tell if theres a big change...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, after the full circus this week (new gearbag, 14 psi actuator on, injectors and AFM upgraded, and.....turbo repair) the diagnosis on the wastegate is in. It was broken. It was broken in a really strange way. The weld that holds the lever arm onto the wastegate flapper shaft broke. Broke completely, but broke in such a way that it could go back together in the "correct" position, or it could rearrange itself somewhere else along the fracture plane and sit with the flapper not parallel to the lever. So, who knows how and when exactly what happened? No-one will ever know. Was it broken like this the first time it spat the circlip and wedged itself deep into the dump? Or was it only broken when I tried to pry it back into place? (I didn't try that hard, but who knows?). Or did it break first? Or did it break between the first and second event of wierdness? Meh. It doesn't matter now. It is welded back together. And it is now held closed by a 14 psi actuator, so...the car has been tuned with the supporting mods (and the order of operations there is that the supporting mods and dyno needed to be able to be done first before adding boost, because it was pinging on <<14 psi with the new turbo with only a 6 psi actuator). And then tuned up a bit, and with the boost controller turned off throughout that process. So it was only running WG pressure and so only hit about 15-16 psi. The turbo is still ever so slightly lazier than might be preferred - like it is still a bit on the big side for the engine. I haven't tested it on the road properly in any way - just driven it around in traffic for a half hour or so. But it is like chalk and cheese compared to what it was. Between dyno numbers and driving feedback: It makes 100 kW at 3k rpm, which is OK, could be better. That's stock 2JZ territory, or RB20 with G series 550. It actually starts building boost from 2k, which is certainly better than it did recently (with all the WG flapper bullshit). Although it's hard to remember what it was like prior to all that - it certainly seems much, much better. And that makes sense, given the WG was probably starting to blow open at anything above about 3 psi anyway (with the 6 psi actuator). It doesn't really get to "full boost" (say 16 psi) until >>4k rpm. I am hopeful that this is a feature of the lack of boost controller keeping boost pressure off the actuator, because it was turned off for the dyno and off for the drives afterward. There's more to be found here, I'm sure. It made 230 rwkW at not a lot more than 6k and held it to over 7k, so there seems to be plenty of potential to get it up to 250-260rwkW with 18 psi or so, which would be a decent effort, considering the stock sized turbo inlet pipework and AFM, and the return flow cooler. According to Tao, those things should definitely put a bit of a limit on it by that sort of number. I must stress that I have not opened the throttle 100% on the road yet - well, at least not 100% and allowed it to wind all the way up. It'll have to wait until some reasonable opportunity. I'm quite looking forward to that - it feels massively better than it has in a loooong time. It's back to its old self, plus about 20% extra powers over the best it ever did before. I'm going to get the boost controller set up to maximise spool and settle at no more than ~17 psi (for now) and then go back on the dyno to see what we can squeeze out of it. There is other interesting news too. I put together a replacement tube to fit the R35 AFM in the stock location. This is the first time the tuner has worked with one, because anyone else he has tuned for has gone from Z32 territory to aftermarket ECU. No-one has ever wanted to stay Nistuned and do what I've done. Anyway, his feedback is that the R35 AFM is super super super responsive. Tiny little changes in throttle position or load turn up immediately as a cell change on the maps. Way, way more responsive than any of the old skool AFMs. Makes it quite diffifult to tune as you have to stay right on top of that so you don't wander off the cell you wanted to tune. But it certainly seems to help with real world throttle response. That's hard to separate from all the other things that changed, but the "pedal feel" is certainly crisp.
    • I'm a bit confused by this post, so I'll address the bit I understand lol.  Use an air compressor and blow away the guide coat sanding residue. All the better if you have a moisture trap for your compressor. You'd want to do this a few times as you sand the area, you wouldn't for example sand the entire area till you think its perfect and then 'confirm' that is it by blowing away the guide coat residue.  Sand the area, blow away the guide coat residue, inspect the panel, back to sanding... rinse and repeat. 
    • The detail level is about right for the money they charge for the full kit... AU$21.00 each issue, 110 issues for a total of $2,300 (I mentioned $2.2K in the first post when the exchange rate was better). $20/week is doable... 😐
    • If planning on joining us for the day(s) please indicate by filling in this form. https://forms.gle/Ma8Nn4DzYVA8uDHg7
×
×
  • Create New...