Jump to content
SAU Community

Rb Engine Track Work Temp.


jnrevo
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 172
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

The water piping for an RB's oil heat exchanger enters the from the rear water exit for the block (also the feed for the heater) and exist the exchanger into the water pump inlet post thermostat.

Here's a question, what location should we be getting our oil temperature from?

Should we be getting it from the bottom of the sump or post oil cooler as it enters the engine's main gallery?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You need to know where it is hottest. It is not important that you are providing it to the engine at a good temperature (post cooler). What is important is that you know how hot it actually gets. As such, the sump (or post oil pump sandwich plate) is the best location.

Or both, if you want to know everything!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have to disagree, You want to know temp and hence viscosity at the bearings, the practical way to do this is measure the feed into the block.

Edited by DCIEVE
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hah!

Question. When does oil break down?

Answer. When it is hot.

Second question. How do you know how hot it has gotten, if you haven't measured it when it was hot?

Second answer. You don't.

You shove "cool enough" oil into your engine and pat yourself on the back. But whilst hanging around in the main feed gallery, it gets hot. Maybe it gets hot enough that whilst it's actually in the journals it starts to crap itself. Oh well. So sad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

so the answer is measure it at its hottest?

... still dont know where we are taking the reading from....The sump, the filter housing, before the cooler if your using one????

im not 100% clear on the flow of oil through an RB engine

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hah!

Question. When does oil break down?

Answer. When it is hot.

Second question. How do you know how hot it has gotten, if you haven't measured it when it was hot?

Second answer. You don't.

You shove "cool enough" oil into your engine and pat yourself on the back. But whilst hanging around in the main feed gallery, it gets hot. Maybe it gets hot enough that whilst it's actually in the journals it starts to crap itself. Oh well. So sad.

Given your bearing dimensions are fixed the variables affecting the bearing performance are speed, flow rate and viscosity. Viscosity can double in 10 deg increments depending where are you are in the temp/viscosity range (log scale). The industrial scale bearings I'm involved with trip on 'feed' lube temperature, given an increase in temp of 5 deg above the trip point can drop the viscosity to a point where bearings fail (lube film is dependant on viscosity, load and speed). Ideally you want to know the temp at the bearing but in reality you have to settle for going as close to the bearing as possible. Oil is tested regularly and replaced based on the rate of deterioration (in most cases contamination happens first).

Now I'll ask you, how do you measure the maximum temp the oil reaches? At best you can measure the temp in the reservoir/sump or after the pump/before the filter, so using your argument - you still have no idea what the max oil temp is nor if the oil has reached a temp where it will break down. Your best of getting the oil tested to figure that part out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

is there really going to be that much temp difference between the bearing and the filter though?

I mean the split second it gets hot at the bearing surely couldn't do damage that couldn't be read at the sensor/filter and knowing what temp you should ease up on it which seems to be around 120...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now I'll ask you, how do you measure the maximum temp the oil reaches? At best you can measure the temp in the reservoir/sump or after the pump/before the filter, so using your argument - you still have no idea what the max oil temp is nor if the oil has reached a temp where it will break down. Your best of getting the oil tested to figure that part out.

It is FAR more conservative and safe to measure the higher temperature rather than the lower temperature. Your industrial bearings are often just that....a bearing. Sure, they may be massive with massive loads on them. Sure, they may be running very fast. But they are seldom embedded within a bloody hot cast iron heat source as well. The lube oil usually flows via a nice hose from the remote pump to the bearing and the performance of the bearing under load is sufficiently well known by the manufacturer and/or commissioning engineer that they can tell the operator to trip it off based on ain inlet temperature because they know how hot it will heat up to. In our engines the bearings' oil feed is in an uncontrolled heater so you don't know how hot it is going in. If you measure it in the sump at 120°C then you know damn well that it had to have been at least that hot in the bearing itself. If you measure it at 105°C after the cooler.......you have no idea what the bearing has been running at. Just a wild guess. Could have been 140°C and breaking down for all you know.

Engineering is about identifying what is important, not just working from other examples.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Where does the standard temp sensor read from?

The heat exchanger where the oil filter mounts.... which is just before it goes into the engine. A couple of people here know what they are talking about.

Edited by bigmikespec
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Engineering is about identifying what is important, not just working from other examples.

In the interests of maintaining my sanity I concede, but thanks for the tip - I'll be sure to pass it on to my grads :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't see the zing.

With respect to the location of the oem temp sensor.....that one doesn't really matter where it is. There is no oil cooler in the equation (oil-water HX notwithstanding) and so the oil temperature will be about the same whether measured in the sump, after the pump, after the HX or after the filter. That example in no way nullifies my position.

The people who I supervise are not engineering graduates. They have PhDs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share




  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I have been looking at some setting on the alarms for the Q60 and what buttons do and so and also been looking for details on the alarm in my V37 which is a standard issue with the car. settings like window roll up and a few others seem to not work at all. i cant seem to find exact info on V37 alarms so Q60 is all i can really go off i have not tried 400Z alarm settings or info yet so that will be next. any one got like a sheet of info on the alarm system in the V37 as all my documents are in japanese but i thought the system would basically be like standard through similar models? 
    • I had a fuel smell coming from the drivers rear and pulled the tank out to inspect where it was coming from, turns out the breather hose from the tank to the filler neck was perished. I’m going to Japan next week and I’ll grab it while I’m there  pulled the oil tank apart and started cleaning this crap out of it, some brake cleaner and rags got it looking new again 
    • Hmm. Was quite a few years ago now. I think I bought from a crowd in the US called CDT Audio. The speaker is the HD-6. The HD-6CF would have been the better option (based on T-S parameters), but they were discontinued in 4 ohm at that point in time. The HD-6 is a better driver in almost every other way (than the CF) - just not as good in IB. They still do the HD-6. They might even have a more suitable (for IB) option here.https://www.cdtaudio.com/cdtnew22/products/components/woofers/midwoofers/midwoofers.htm But, here's the rub. I was working in the US a lot back then, so I got them delivered to my US office and then just brought them back to OZ myself. I don't know if they will ship to OZ, and it probably wouldn't be great cost-wise anyway. As to results. They're driven direct off the rear channels of my headunit, because the headunit can be setup to run the rears as subs. So, not a lot of power being fed there. Nevertheless, there's no shortage of volume - the sub levels don't need or want to be boosted at all. The bass is definitely not what you would call "tight". It is definitely a bit delayed compared to a proper sub. But, with the great front soundstage and really good 6.5" woofers in the front doors, I'm getting most of the bass detail from the front and the rear is really only to extend the bottom end a bit. Works for what I'm doing. I mean - until recently you couldn't really hold a conversation in my car due to the fuel pump, and for many years I had tyres so noisy (Kumho KU36 at <50 tread depth) that I had to drive with earplugs anyway!
    • curious to know what drivers you chose and the results? quik mafs, says two 6.5s should roughly equate somewhere between a single 8" or 10" driver. i agree that IB is definitely the way to go in most cars imo.
    • S13 and R32 rear suspension geometry is horrible once you lower it (which everyone does). The camber & toe out ramp is very aggressive, hence it's common for the S13 boys/girls to use a S14 or S15 subframe as the geometry is light years ahead. I'm sure the same can be done on R32s, but I don't know anyone that has done that.
×
×
  • Create New...