Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

That's a drain for the excess oil that bleeds off from the VCT. If you look internally in a 25 head it lines up directly across from the oil bypass port on the inlet side of the head. If it wasn't there the factory drain holes would possibly be overwhelmed by all the excess oil from the VCT when it's not in use.

Vents are on the inlet side only and drains are on the exhaust side only in a RB engine. It's all dictated by the direction of the cranks rotation and how it pushes and pulls the crank case gases around.

I understand one side of the motor has higher pressure than the other. But it's just that, higher pressure. If there is excessive pressure everywhere in the sump the inlet side will vent pressure as it does on a rb25.

Spewing out oil seems to happen only at the track during long periods at WOT . My RB25 had this problem and so did my RB30. My RB30 is a rings and bearings only build (everything else apart from the rod bolts is stock) and it spewed oil. I got a leak-down test which came out at 5% - 8% which is ok. I have an N1 pump! I fixed the oil problem by fitting 2 x 1.0mm restrictors and two sump vents on the inlet side of the engine going to a catch can - one to the top and the other to the bottom so the oil can drain back. This has fixed my oil spewing problems.I used to think that the drains at the back of the head were a waste of time but now I think that if anything they aggravate the problem by helping to blow oil out of the cam cover breathers. For others with RB26s, mines baffles have helped.

You say your leakdown test was bad - what were the numbers?

I would delete the rear head "drain" from your new build.

So what are the standard Nissan rings made out of ? If they are good enough for the power some motors are producing then perhaps standard thickness rings and end gaps are whats required. Just need a piston to fit. On that note, what is Nismo using ? I'll wager thicker rings at 1.5mm and standard end gaps. This by the way is one of the best threads going. Some good info here. Venting and not head drain is important in a high horsepower application but I do agree with some that we are making some fundamental mistakes in material selection when assembling our engines. There is some great info in drag racing forums on this very subject. Though to be fair a 2,000hp engine may not necessarily be too worried about the extra drag of a thicker ring.

Spewing out oil seems to happen only at the track during long periods at WOT . My RB25 had this problem and so did my RB30. My RB30 is a rings and bearings only build (everything else apart from the rod bolts is stock) and it spewed oil. I got a leak-down test which came out at 5% - 8% which is ok. I have an N1 pump! I fixed the oil problem by fitting 2 x 1.0mm restrictors and two sump vents on the inlet side of the engine going to a catch can - one to the top and the other to the bottom so the oil can drain back. This has fixed my oil spewing problems.I used to think that the drains at the back of the head were a waste of time but now I think that if anything they aggravate the problem by helping to blow oil out of the cam cover breathers. For others with RB26s, mines baffles have helped.

You say your leakdown test was bad - what were the numbers?

I would delete the rear head "drain" from your new build.

Best was 17% out to 28%.

As an aside wrt the Mines baffles. The entry point for the oil into the system is at the back of the head which is not ideal - that is why you have to relocate the little covers for the cam lobes to the rear - to stop them flinging oil up into the entry points of the baffled system. I cant see how the Mines baffles are better than the stock items when you have a head full of oil?

Lastly there are some interesting notes from JE about side and back clearances for rings for the two different alloys commonly available. Oddly the numbers are identical.

piston_instrc2618.pdf

piston_instrc4032.pdf

Have you looked at total seal rings? I haven't used them myself but by design they look good. I would like to know if they are used in heavily boosted applications or just your run of the mill chevy's - which seems to be their market...

So what are the standard Nissan rings made out of ? If they are good enough for the power some motors are producing then perhaps standard thickness rings and end gaps are whats required. Just need a piston to fit. On that note, what is Nismo using ? I'll wager thicker rings at 1.5mm and standard end gaps. This by the way is one of the best threads going. Some good info here. Venting and not head drain is important in a high horsepower application but I do agree with some that we are making some fundamental mistakes in material selection when assembling our engines. There is some great info in drag racing forums on this very subject. Though to be fair a 2,000hp engine may not necessarily be too worried about the extra drag of a thicker ring.

From off the top of my head I would reckon the rings to be iron.

AFAIK Nismo dont make a piston for the RB26 only Nissan.

From the maual:

End gaps are much smaller than for forgies.

9.4 thou to 13.4 thou for the top ring.

16.5 to 22.5 thou for the second ring.

Also

The groove gap is 1.6 to 3 thou for the top ring and 1.2 to 2.6 thou for the second.

Finding the piston to fit is as hard as finding the ring set with a 1.5mm top ring. There is only one ring set that I have found - from JE. Maybe ACL if you can find the right size. Pistons will have to be customs (Again unless you can find ACL stuff) but not very custom really as you can just use the standard designs and modify them for the different rings.

Edited by djr81
  • 1 month later...

Well the block is sorted to 86mm and the JE rings are on their way from the US.

Next up is pistons. Could someone who has some laying about help out by offering a measurement of the ring lands on a forged RB26 piston? I have attached some measurements of an ACL piston - just not sure how much they vary from brand to brand.

20130621130016.pdf

Edited by djr81
  • 4 weeks later...

Well after a hopeless weekend at Wanneroo I had a rethink and ordered some other rings from Pacific Engine Parts in Melbourne. The bloke who runs it, Trevor McGregor is really good value. Anyway the ring pack is 1.2, 1.5 and 4.0mm.

Has anyone used Specialist Piston Services, also in Melbourne?

http://www.specialpistonservices.com/

Did you end up running the rings you got from JE?

No I realised I had coughed up on the order number and received some random rings. My fault. Most annoyed about the time that was wasted.

I figured I would go for the more known of the two options. Basically, having thought about what Trevor (and others) said about the oil ring thickness and the function of the second ring I think there is merit in the argument.

I just need confimation of the depths (waiting on an email) to then flick to the pistons mob(s).

Had an exhaust manifold gasket start to leak on the weekend so it may as well come out anyway. Just got to hustle a bit now to get it organised.

Ring dimensions from Pacific Engine Parts are as follows:

Top Ring .0462” (1.2mm) Wide .1270” (3.23mm) Radial

Second Ring .0582” (1.5mm) Wide .1450” (3.67mm) Radial

Oil Ring .1540” (4.0mm) Wide .1260” (3.20mm) Radial

Anyway CP offered gaps:

Top will be .048'

2nd will be .060

3rd will be .159 oil

So 2 thou, 2 thou and 5 thou.

Any comments?

Looks the goods!

Will you be running a hone through lightly just to make sure the cross hatch is fresh. I think only maybe 4-5 strokes would do it for each bore, by hand ofcourse.

Looks the goods!

Will you be running a hone through lightly just to make sure the cross hatch is fresh. I think only maybe 4-5 strokes would do it for each bore, by hand ofcourse.

would this still require the full torque plate hone etc? If you were say just re-ringing because of lack of bedding in etc as an example ?

No torque plate really, your not going to remove much material, purely just to make sure there is a half decent crosshatch there for the new rings to conform with. If you had one its not that hard to bolt it down and do it, but it wouldnt be essential. If your super pedantic you probably would though.

  • 1 month later...

Pistons are here thanks to the kindly folk at Special Piston Services. Much easier to deal with than the Seppos. Quick turn around too.

Just got to get the motor assembled and may actually have something decent, fingers crossed. Going to delete the external rear of head return and run a pair of vents from the sump to the catch can in -10. With PEP's rings, a 1.25mm restrictor in the head and some drilled out internal returns that should be enough.

post-5134-0-68103500-1378171897_thumb.jpg

post-5134-0-98949300-1378171916_thumb.jpg

post-5134-0-99808000-1378171934_thumb.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Ok i will get those 310mm. I found one but on a different site. This is the description on those...is it ok? Technical parameters: - Axle: front. - Disc type: ventilated. - Number of holes: 5. - Disc diameter: 310mm. - Total height with center: 54mm. - Thickness (new/min.): 30/28mm. - Designed for brake calipers manufacturer: Sumitomo.
    • You Gregged a whole racetrack!?
    • Look for broken wire or bad connector at the motor. Might not be it, but is worth starting there, as it is easy.
    • Hi everyone, I’m having an issue with my R32 GT-R. Sometimes, when the car goes over a bump or experiences some vibration, the 4WD warning light comes on the dashboard. When I check the code from the control unit in the trunk, it shows Code 19 – ETS Motor. However, everything seems to be working fine — if I turn off the engine and restart the car, the light goes away and everything functions normally. Has anyone experienced this before? Where should I start troubleshooting this issue? Thanks in advance!
    • I'm back from the dyno - again! I went looking for someone who knew LS's and had a roller dyno, to see how it shaped up compared to everything else and confirm the powerband really is peaking where Mr Mamo says it should. TLDR: The dyno result I got this time definitely had the shape of how it feels on the road and finally 'makes sense'. Also we had a bit more time to play with timing on the dyno, it turns out the common practice in LS is to lower the timing around peak torque and restore it to max after. So given a car was on the dyno and mostly dialled in already, it was time for tweaking. Luis at APS is definitely knowledgable when it came to this and had overlays ready to go and was happy to share. If you map out your cylinder airmass you start seeing graphs that look a LOT like the engine's torque curve. The good thing also is if you map out your timing curve when you're avoiding knock... this curve very much looks like the inverse of the airmass curve. The result? Well it's another 10.7kw/14hp kw from where I drove it in at. Pretty much everywhere, too. As to how much this car actually makes in Hub Dyno numbers, American Dyno numbers, or Mainline dyno numbers, I say I don't know and it's gone up ~25kw since I started tinkering lol. It IS interesting how the shorter ratio gears I have aren't scaled right on this dyno - 6840RPM is 199KMH, not 175KMH. I have also seen other printouts here with cars with less mods at much higher "kmh" for their RPM due Commodores having 3.45's or longer (!) rear diff ratios maxing out 4th gear which is the 1:1 gear on the T56. Does this matter? No, not really. The real answer is go to the strip and see what it traps, but: I guess I should have gone last Sunday...
×
×
  • Create New...