Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Without meaning to take this off topic, is the question just general interest, or do you have a heat problem?

Ducting might be useful or even imperative in some race setups, but I guess most brake issues in road/light track cars could easily be fixed in other ways.

Mock up of the original ducts that run from the front lip (they were missing on my car when i bought it) and UAS deflectors on the radius rods. Nismo used to make a similar sort of thing.

EDIT: They're UAS deflectors in MagicMikes pix ^

Im running Brembo's after a few laps just noticed they were heating up a bit, will be going down the ducting just wanted to see what some people have done.

I like your set up MagicMikeZ32 did you notice much difference?

The standard gtr setup has brake ducts in the lower lip, under the under tray. N1s had factory fitted deflectors on the castor rods that UAS copied in the pics above.

But that is all a little lightweight really. All a castor rod deflector can do is waft air in the right direction, and I'd be willing to be the result of a comparable, back to back test is 0o or thereabouts.

If you want a serious ducting setup check Risking's posts in the motorsport section, it shows a proper duct that runs to the inside of the disc, that would make a big difference.

Im running Brembo's after a few laps just noticed they were heating up a bit, will be going down the ducting just wanted to see what some people have done.

I like your set up MagicMikeZ32 did you notice much difference?

See the real issue there is that the brembos are a very small increase over the standard setup (maybe 10% larger for pads and discs). There are much better upgrades, cheaper like the D2 kits.

Having said that, our class required us to run standard disc and caliper for years which means I had to run the brembo setup. After trying a heap of pads and fluids over the years, Hawk DT-60 and Motul RBF600 gave me acceptable braking even over 1 hour races with those calipers and discs. That setup was focussed on making the absolute most out of what i had to run, rather than adding a little cooling....as you can see they ran very hot but still worked perfectly (RIP Oran Park night racing :( )

hot_brakes.jpg

^ as above - the rotors are just too small for multi laps really. Lesser heat dissipation capacity.

Ducting isn't going to make a world of difference.

What will?

Put a 356mm upgrade on, you'll have a lot more capacity and get a good 2-3 laps more out of it.

Air deflectors do very little other than direct some cool air onto the inner face of the rotor......

A rotor has two faces and the core is where the majority of the heat is disipated to. The air needs to go into the centre of the rotor hat to be of any benifit what so ever.

I've just done a set of alluminium bolt on adaptors that bolt to the slipper mounting holes and have a provision to attach a 2.5 or 3.0inch duct hose to very similar to those I posted from a v8 Supercar.

Directs air straight into the rotors core instead of just splashing cold air at one of the rotors faces.

Ill post up some photos when they are installed again next week

Air deflectors do very little other than direct some cool air onto the inner face of the rotor......

A rotor has two faces and the core is where the majority of the heat is disipated to. The air needs to go into the centre of the rotor hat to be of any benifit what so ever.

I've just done a set of alluminium bolt on adaptors that bolt to the slipper mounting holes and have a provision to attach a 2.5 or 3.0inch duct hose to very similar to those I posted from a v8 Supercar.

Directs air straight into the rotors core instead of just splashing cold air at one of the rotors faces.

Ill post up some photos when they are installed again next week

Those deflectors look like would do a decent job of pushing air towards and into the core. At a guess they'd have to at least double the airflow available to the vanes. With a bit of shaping/massaging of the surface of the deflectors then they'd direct air even better into the core. But yes, ducting would work much better again.

Something similar from Porsche forums: http://forums.pelicanparts.com/porsche-911-technical-forum/167598-brake-upgrade-35-works-993-deflectors.html

Edited by simpletool

What about water cooling setups?

Water that is squirted into the core of the rotor.. I remember seeing a kit for the R35 but i havn't heard much about them?

I believe V8 supercars have this method as well.

But when do the activate? Is it in a a preset duty cycle, or they only come on when brakes are applied etc?

I know ducting is easier, but having a huge oil cooler on one side and a power steering cooler on the other doesn't give a lot of room to get fresh air into the brake rotors.

They run front brake temp sensors in the V8's and this is used to control the water spray for the brakes, you still need to have ducted airflow for the water spray to work, as it is designed to atomise the water in the airflow. Just spraying the water onto the inside face of the disk will not work, and may lead to failure of the rotor due to excessive localised cooling.

They run front brake temp sensors in the V8's and this is used to control the water spray for the brakes, you still need to have ducted airflow for the water spray to work, as it is designed to atomise the water in the airflow. Just spraying the water onto the inside face of the disk will not work, and may lead to failure of the rotor due to excessive localised cooling.

Yes, definitely something that needs careful attention. Too much water application and crack, schnap, eeerrriiiiggghhhhh, bbrrrkkkkkkkssshhhhhh, ouch.

They run front brake temp sensors in the V8's and this is used to control the water spray for the brakes, you still need to have ducted airflow for the water spray to work, as it is designed to atomise the water in the airflow. Just spraying the water onto the inside face of the disk will not work, and may lead to failure of the rotor due to excessive localised cooling.

This was what i was thinking as well. Too much and yes you'll crack a rotor easily.

Yeah ok, so the ECU monitors brake rotor temp and once over a set point, it enables water sprayers (in a duty cycle arrangement i assume?)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
    • It would be different if the sealant hadn't started to peel up with gaps in the glue about ~6cm and bigger in some areas. I would much prefer not having to do the work take them off the car . However, the filler the owner put in the roof rack mount cavities has shrunk and begun to crack on the rail delete panels. I cant trust that to hold off moisture ingress especially where I live. Not only that but I have faded paint on as well as on either side of these panels, so they would need to come off to give the roofline a proper respray. My goal is to get in there and put a healthy amount of epoxy instead of panel filler/bog and potentially skin with carbon fiber. I have 2 spare rolls from an old motorcycle fairing project from a few years back and I think it'd be a nice touch on a black stag.  I've seen some threads where people replace their roof rack delete with a welded in sheet metal part. But has anyone re-worked the roof rails themselves? It seems like there is a lot of volume there to add in some threads and maybe a keyway for a quick(er) release roof rack system. Not afraid to mill something out if I have to. It would be cool to have a cross bar only setup. That way I can keep the sleek roofline that would accept a couple bolts to gain back that extra utility  3D print some snazzy covers to hide the threaded section to be thorough and keep things covered when not using the rack. 
    • Probably not. A workshop grade scantool is my go to for proper Consult interrogation. Any workshop grade tool should do it. Just go to a workshop.
    • In my head it does make sense to be a fuel problem since that is what I touched when cleaning the system. When I was testing with the fuel pressure gauge, the pressure was constantly 2.5 bar with the FPR vacuum removed. When stalling, the pressure was going up to 3.0 bar (which is how it should be on ignition).
    • ECUtalk pages don't mention they support the ABS computer (consult port has more than one CAN), so you might just need a different scan tool. But, I would expect ABS is a different light to the brake warning/handbrake light, do you see an ABS light come on for a few seconds when you turn the key from ACC to IGN? But since you said: I'd have a look at the ABS sensors in the rear hubs to make sure they are not damaged, disconnected etc.
×
×
  • Create New...