Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Now to work the upper back for glory!

Wide Grip Bodyweight Pullups. Can you do 20/30/40/50? If not , now is your time to try.

Rules:

  • No bouncing up /kipping - Each rep is to come to a complete stop at the bottom of the ROM.
  • Arms are straight in the bottom of the rep, no bent elbows
  • No chalk
  • No straps
  • No gloves
  • No Touching the floor
  • No resting at the bottom of the rep, 1-2 second pause at the top if you want but, no resting the chin up there (it's your funeral)
  • Hand grip is to be wider than shoulder width.
  • Chin over the bar at the top.

Challenge starts now. Ends last day of Feb.

Edited by rev210
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/419064-pullup-challenge/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 192
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Supinated/pronated/either?

Allowed to have knees bent or straight legs too?

It's a pullup as opposed to a chin up .so hands over the top of the bar. No chin up grip.

The pullup bar is to be a single bar style .__-----------__

Not the peg style. -I-------I-

No leg movement (kipping) so as long as they are still through the movement , straight or bent is fine (whatever works)

Supinated/pronated/either?

Imagine doing a wide grip chin up with a supinated grip. My wrists elbows and shoulders are crying just thinking about it.

So are they essentially dead hang pull ups?

Even with bent legs I almost touch the ground when doing them on my power rack and in pretty sure my elbows would still be a bit bent...

Edited by Mitcho_7

Imagine doing a wide grip chin up with a supinated grip. My wrists elbows and shoulders are crying just thinking about it.

Grip only had to be wider than shoulders, it wouldn't be that bad.

This will be interesting for me, as I normally do wide grip pulldown behind neck, rather than in front. Should have plenty of translation though.

interesting choice of challenge for a tall, heavy bloke... this one suited to the lighter guys... I used to be able to do 20+ but reckon I'll struggle with anything over 15 at the moment

Well nows your chance to get back (pun) into shape. If you want to go heavier in the deads and bench , this will help as well. Use some scapular retraction at the top of the movement. Maybe not so much for the challenge but, in general.

.

bit harder when you are heavy but, as an example here is a 100kg bloke.for 20. Form and technique as about right for what this is.

remember no vid / no register.

I'll just add to this...this guy rests at the bottom of the last few reps...do not do this, as per rules in first post.

too many dumb rules...like no chalk for example.

Or no resting. Stopping at the bottom or the top makes it harder, not easier, it's not a rest. Don't believe me, then do cadence pull-ups instead.

No kipping, chest to bar/head over bar, arms lockout, overhand grip.

That's all that had to be said.

too many dumb rules...like no chalk for example.

Or no resting. Stopping at the bottom or the top makes it harder, not easier, it's not a rest. Don't believe me, then do cadence pull-ups instead.

No kipping, chest to bar/head over bar, arms lockout, overhand grip.

That's all that had to be said.

Seriously do you 'need' chalk to do pullups? I used to be able to do 40 without chalk but, maybe there are people with sweaty hands that need it. Otherwise it's just an aid to get slightly more efficient and some people don't have access to it. You might do more with it but, everyone is going to do without. I didn't use chalk for the deadlift challenge, didn't have any to use.

Rules say you can pause at the top, as you say it's not a rest (I noted it's your funeral). Hanging at the bottom allows the backmuscles some rest at the expense of grip fatigue, thats why it's a no no.

Just be thankfull I didn't ask for people to be wearing a clown suit and do a 1 second static hold mid rep up and down.ha ha....

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • And make sure the belts are tightened appropriately too.
    • They care about emissions, and cost the most. Save weight where possible, and make manufacturing easier. Less material also let's the engine transfer heat to water quicker, and bring the engine up to temp quicker, better for emissions and getting them past their warranty period.
    • I was under the impression the reason why OEMs are going with solutions like relatively thin "right-sized" cylinder walls with technologies like PTWA and open deck is because they care a lot about whatever marginal knock margin benefits they get from that vs the structural rigidity benefits of a closed deck block and thicker cylinder walls. I also see some weird stuff like plastic inserts in the water jacket around the cylinders to try and equalize cylinder wall temperatures. re: the PRP blocks and heads at the end of the day it's hard to know what is and isn't going to work there, just have to see what the initial buyers say about it.
    • Which is why I didn't mention that hardness testing, and specifically mentioned the bore and deck thickness testing. Yeah, not really. The bore temperature will be a lot more even around the top half inch or so, where the material distribution is dominated by the deck, and which is the only place where the bore surface temperature heating any gas in the cylinder is likely to have any effect on detonation. Think about it. Another inch or so down the bore, you might have a hotter spot. The gas there might get a bit hotter, then the piston rises squeezes that gas away from there at high speed and mixes it with other gas from nearby. Instant dilution of the problem. I'd be surprised if it was an issue at any time other than in racing engines or OEM dev engines being run at the ragged edge of tuning. Say what now?
    • https://dsportmag.com/the-tech/education/engine-tech-material-hardness-testing/ The PRP testing on block hardness I'm not sure how much it actually can be trusted. The thinner cylinder walls on RBs is a bit of a problem vs 2JZ but it really depends on the design goal. Siamesed cylinder bores like a 2JZ cause uneven cylinder wall temps too, which means a bit of distortion induced by that + the hotspot can affect knock margin. Something that actually gives me a bit of pause with the PRP block, whether super thick cylinder walls are going to keep it from being drop-in compatible on an otherwise OEM rebuild. 
×
×
  • Create New...