Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys im just wondering what is the maximum safe boost level for a r32 gtst. I just bought a r32 its got a few mods like 3inch exsurst, walbro fuel pump, hks filter and apparently a high flow turbo but it looks stock without taking it out. Without a boost controller its spooling up to 0.8bar or 12psi its running a little ruff and smells really fumey.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/421467-maximum-stock-psi-for-r32/
Share on other sites

Stock boost is 10 psi. 12 psi is easy with just a big exhaust (and possibly a bigger intercooler to reduce restriction). No boost controller needed.

So, whether or not there is a high flowed turbo on it, it could easily be running 12 psi with no further mods needed. The ECU will be perfectly fine, no emo R&R business going on, because it's an R32, not one of those stupid R33 ECUs. But it will almost certainly be running quite rich, because the stock maps are very rich at elevated boost levels, and it is quite possible that the ratty old coilpacks are not handling things real well. So it's not surprising that it might smell a bit fuelly.

Oh, and given that it has a big fuel pump on it, it will almost certainly be running a lot richer at high load&rev than it normally would. The original fuel pump would not be able to to maintain full pressure at really high flows, so pressure starts to fall off. Mixtures lean out. ECU is running in open loop, so is just working off the maps. Everything is good. Bang in a big fuel pump and the pressure stays high up top and the mixtures get richer.

Cool cheers for that info. It really dosnt like to idle cold it wants to stall one minute the rev at 2 grand the next till its warm. I replaced the tps and am about to do a service on it. There something wrong with the motor just not sure what it is.

I ran a stock m35 Stagea ceramic turbo up to 19psi on e85, I ran it like that for 5 months while I got the parts together for the GTX. Either Nissan started making the ceramic wheels stronger, or it is the age of the turbo that makes it fail quicker. (heat cycles and old worn rear bearings)

Theres a blowoff valve on there but I blocked the hose to it because the blowoff vavle was leaking (its really old and shity looking ). Is there a way of actualy telling whether it is a high flow turbo with out taking it off. Do the stock ones have a stamp on them at all to look for

I ran a stock m35 Stagea ceramic turbo up to 19psi on e85, I ran it like that for 5 months while I got the parts together for the GTX. Either Nissan started making the ceramic wheels stronger, or it is the age of the turbo that makes it fail quicker. (heat cycles and old worn rear bearings)

There's all sorts of different bell curves associated with these things. Some will die at stock boost. Some will last only a short time at high boost. Some will last a long time at the sensible limit boost (whatever that may be for a given turbo type and engine). Some will last a long time at really high boost. Manufacturing tolerances, age, past treatment, etc etc etc. They all stack up.

My RB20 turbo ran at 17 psi for quite a while, then I backed it down to 14 psi and it ran like that for 10 years. A mate's died at 12 psi a month after he put the exhaust on (and the boost went up as a result).

Theres a blowoff valve on there but I blocked the hose to it because the blowoff vavle was leaking (its really old and shity looking ). Is there a way of actualy telling whether it is a high flow turbo with out taking it off. Do the stock ones have a stamp on them at all to look for

there's a start, put the stock one back on if you're running an AFM with a stock ECU... and to answer your question not really, I would just pull off the intake and see if the comp housing has been machined

It had a microtech on it when I got it. It ran like shit and didnt aant to start so I checked the computer and it was all corroded so I put a standard one on and now it starts but dosnt want to idle cold at all I have to sit there and

Keep it from stalling till its warm. But even then if I turn the aircon on it will die start away. I will have to buy a new blowoff vavle and do a minor service to it and see if thers is any difference

You might have larger injectors running on a stock ECU, all makes sense now.. the car had a high flow turbo, an aftermarket ECU, so most likely it has larger injectors to compliment the rest of the setup.

I would see what size injectors they are, if they're bigger either you install the stock ones OR get another aftermarket ECU, rescale the injectors to suit then bring it to a tuner.

ummmmmmmmms.... can't remember on the top of my head what RB20DET injectors look like, but they could also be 440cc GT-R injectors.

Can you trace the wires back to a resistor pack like so:

post-46-1171324843.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...