Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Old tech! Haha. The old Hitachi et al ECUs are still good bits of kit. If you don't need bells and whistles, then a Nistuned factory ECU is the absolute best control for a lightly tuned engine, and still more than capable of dealing with even heavy modification. The only real downside is needing to retain the AFM.

If you need a lot of bells and whistles, then it makes sense to look elsewhere.

And of course it is the best bang for buck for many people. A few hundred $ for a board put in and whatever it costs for the tune.

You ask "just wondering if anyone can give me some info about different tunes etc?" I don't really know what you mean by that. Do you mean different ECUs? The only "different tunes" you would have for any engine would be one with no safety margins and max power, a safer one with less timing and richer mixtures, and perhaps versions of those for different fuels. Anything else doesn't make much sense.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/423300-tunes/#findComment-6811882
Share on other sites

well some one was telling me that standard tune would be a nistune, then some say mild tune, then some say safe tune, i have no idea what they are on about. is there like different brand of tunes at different prices and stuff or am i looking at this the wrong way?

well i went to one tuner. he say yeh get a nistune, cheapsest atm and can things simple

go to a different tuner, and he says stay away from nistune because its out dated.. uses 300zx tech or something... man seriously didnt know wtf he was on about... i just nodded and smiled... so yeh... not sure how to approach getting car tuned etc.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/423300-tunes/#findComment-6811932
Share on other sites

well some one was telling me that standard tune would be a nistune, then some say mild tune, then some say safe tune, i have no idea what they are on about. is there like different brand of tunes at different prices and stuff or am i looking at this the wrong way?

well i went to one tuner. he say yeh get a nistune, cheapsest atm and can things simple

go to a different tuner, and he says stay away from nistune because its out dated.. uses 300zx tech or something... man seriously didnt know wtf he was on about... i just nodded and smiled... so yeh... not sure how to approach getting car tuned etc.

You need to get a few things straight in your head so it makes sense.

1) Nistune is not a "tune". Nistune is a daughterboard that gets installed in the factory ECU in place of the original EEPROM (or equivalent). The daughterboard provides the ability to emulate the original EEPROM to the ECU, whilst being programmable through the Consult port in the car. Win! You can change nearly everything in the ECU's tune (there are, obviously, some limits to what you can do).

2) No ECU is a "tune". An ECU is just that, a piece of hardware. The "tune" is the work done to set up the fuel, timing and other tables in the ECU so that it runs the engine the way you want it to run. Or, you could consider the "tune" to be the finished product of that work.

3) Nistune for an R34's Neo engine uses the R34 ECU. The only engine that you can't Nistune with it's own ECU is the R33 RB25DET because the ECUs in those things have a bad dose of the gheys. And even using a Z32 ECU to put Nistune onto an 33 is still better than leaving the R33 ECU in charge of the engine.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/423300-tunes/#findComment-6812031
Share on other sites

well some one was telling me that standard tune would be a nistune, then some say mild tune, then some say safe tune, i have no idea what they are on about. is there like different brand of tunes at different prices and stuff or am i looking at this the wrong way?

well i went to one tuner. he say yeh get a nistune, cheapsest atm and can things simple

go to a different tuner, and he says stay away from nistune because its out dated.. uses 300zx tech or something... man seriously didnt know wtf he was on about... i just nodded and smiled... so yeh... not sure how to approach getting car tuned etc.

Who's this someone? would like to know.

R33 use Z32 modified ECUs or even R32 ECUs with an external VTC controller

R34 use R34 ECUs

Essentially you can consider Nistune like a standalone ECU is a sense where it can be plugged into a laptop, maps tuned however the fuark you want them. So it can be aggressive, mild or safe however you like it done.

So the person who said that Nistune safe or mild or whatever the heck he said is wrong.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/423300-tunes/#findComment-6812258
Share on other sites

The best piece of advice i can give you is figure out what you want to use the car for daily? track duties? whatever.

then pick a power figure where you will be happy.

figure out your budget.

once you have established these three things compromise on what is going to best suit you as far as an ecu.

if you want to run any sort of additional functions Launch control anti lag E85 you will need an aftermarket ECU

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/423300-tunes/#findComment-6813014
Share on other sites

interesting thanks fellas i think i have a bit better understanding.

so let me get this, there is no specific tune names for tune, and the nistune is a daughterboard ecu for the stock, but the r34 ecu is remappable thus i don't need to buy a new ecu for the tune.

i was chasing around 400HP.

i googled nistune, didnt really tell me how much "make way more power than you will ever make, using nistune."

so whats more recommended or vouched for? a nistune chip or apexi power fc?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/423300-tunes/#findComment-6813037
Share on other sites

Nistune and PFC are approximately the same capability. PFC is less legal. Nistune is also illegal, but at least it is in the factory ECU, so it looks like the original ECU.

400HP at the fly or at the wheels? Either is really a doddle for either ECU anyway, so it hardly matters. You can get close to 400HP at the flywheel on the factory AFM with Nistune or PFC. 400 at the wheels will require a Z32 AFM, but also be pushing the limits of what an unopened engine is happy running without breaking anyway.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/423300-tunes/#findComment-6813071
Share on other sites

Biggest nissan AFM (Z32 AFM) is up to 500hp.

If you are chasing over 500hp you need map senser ecu (motec , haltech etc).

So ECU is depends on power.

If you are drive mainly on street nistune (remap) is best.

Dont forget Ford lightning MAF or a multiple afm setup.

400 - 500rwkw no worries.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/423300-tunes/#findComment-6814087
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...