Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I know most people here use HKS GT25s but Im about to go down a different path and try the TRUST route :sly:

I was wondering if anyone here can tell me how different specs of TD06 would perform on a RB25DET, in particular the Compressor housing specs between the 17C, 20G, and 25G

The exhaust housing is pretty straight forward: bigger, more power, more lag

What about the the differences between TD06, TD06S, TD06SH and TD06SL2?

The TD06-17C are usually used on high powered SR20s but anyone every tried them on RB25s?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/42446-trust-td-06-different-specs/
Share on other sites

hey got a tdo6 20g with 8cm exhaust housing.. internal wastegate.. you can get 8cm, 10cm, i think 12cm not sure about 14.. but there is a guy with a 16cm i think.. its rob77 he mite post up details. im not sure about any power ratings.. dunt even know about mine.. so if some one could help out please.. im going to convert it to external wastegate i think.. just for the noise (as its a drift car and need all the wank value parts :)) this is going on a rb20 and hopefully isnt too laggy. there was a jms car running a internal wastegated tdo6 19c and he made 306rwkw on 1.6bar with special fuel and ran 235rwkw at a dyno day not sure on boost/fuel etc tho. did run a 11.3 i think on slicks also.. if that helps. oh and that was on rb25/microtech etc etc

How much power you after...a L2-20G is equivalent to a GT2835, a SH-25G maybe too powerful if you want to keep it a street car. I know an Evo with a TD06SH-25G will make 650ps @ 2bars.

Thus the question which is constantly asked, why go L2-20G when the factory Evo turbo can run high 11s and make just as much power (~400ps), same with why go T67 when a TD06 can make just as much. Depends on the car, setup and tuning.

Once my engine was rebuilt with forged pistons we ran up 366hp @ 1bar on a td06-20g 16cm^2 exhuast housing. I had the exhaust housing and dump pipe ceramic coated whilst the engine was in bits and I get full boost by 4300rpm. Do a search on "average power" as that thread has a copy of my dyno sheet. Its such a wild ride now, it goes from ~160hp to ~330hp in the space of 1000rpm. I'd like to try higher boost settings, but without bigger injectors, a decent exhaust manifold (its all bolted onto the stock one) and some cams I dont think its worth it. Only fault I find is the lag, a ball bearing turbo would probably come on boost about 500-800rpm quicker for the same size.

Only fault I find is the lag, a ball bearing turbo would probably come on boost about 500-800rpm quicker for the same size.

Is that a hunch or something that Steve SST etc has told you. My thinking is that it wouldnt be that dramatic, could be wrong, probably am, just interested to know. In the Garret catalogue, what does the 16cm housing equate to, something like a 1.12 or bigger isnt it?

Buster vs B-Man would be a more vaild comparison, both have ~325rwkw peak (Buster 328, B-Man 323). Buster's TD06-25G/10cm rear had more all over the curve, boost coming in 1,000rpm earlier + a higher peak. B-Man's 3040/1.22 A/R is capable of far more - his is only in initial stages of development whereas Buster's was at it's peak.

(I should just shaddup and let both of those guys post here, but I blabber too much)

have a td06-19c internal gate turbs, has been flowed with garret comp wheel (the std comp wheel was shagged) even so the std wheel is very ugly in its design, and tiny too. Havent actually ran this setup yet but getting close (rb20)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...