Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I see that these are starting to trickle into NZ. Late models, low kms = higher prices. Have they made their appearance in Oz yet and does anyone know what they are like, performance, spec, fuel economy wise?

I have been looking at Toyota Highlander/ Kluger but higher alleged fuel consumption and smaller tank puts me off. Range, for me, counts. I have seen 9.7 l / 100 kms for the Nissan quoted, with 80 l tank, which is more to my liking. Cruise control is my desire too and not sure if this comes as standard in Japan.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/425445-skyline-crossover-37-gt/
Share on other sites

Yeah, there are a couple floating around. I've been looking, more out of interest than serious want. We have Infiniti now, who have brought the FX range out here, so you can buy a V8 crossover brand new for $110,000 or so for a premium model.

One import on carsales at the moment 2009 v6 for $44k. 8000kms, which I bet is BS.

Not sure if they are available for import, or if its just personal imports coming in.

  • Like 1

May be a real car, they are eligible for SEVS import so the price sounds reasonable for 2009.

http://www.raws.com.au/SEVSRulingC.asp?RulingID=622

No point trying to compare Nissan OZ / Inifinti OZ robbery to free market prices....they want $86k for a v36 skyline afterall.

BTW I'd have to say I'm not a fan of the shape.....worst thing I've seen since Subaru Tribeca or Porsche Cayenne

Yeah, there are a couple floating around. I've been looking, more out of interest than serious want. We have Infiniti now, who have brought the FX range out here, so you can buy a V8 crossover brand new for $110,000 or so for a premium model.

One import on carsales at the moment 2009 v6 for $44k. 8000kms, which I bet is BS.

Not sure if they are available for import, or if its just personal imports coming in.

Prestige Motorsport regularly have them in their Car of the Day email with rough L&C pricing so I'd say they are able to be brought in.

Yeah, I looked and the 3.7 versions are available on SEVS. Unfortunatly, I don't think the V8 was sold in Japan. A 370gt four premium with the black interior would be nice, the styling is an acquired taste. I don't mind it, but looks a quite a bit like the Porsche IMO

http://www.goo-net-exchange.com/usedcars/NISSAN/SKYLINE_CROSSOVER/700020437020130420003/index.html

  • 9 months later...

Just sold my CKV36 and seriously considering an NJ50 Crossover.

If only Nissan had made the Stagea with a VQ37 and an interior like the V36 :whistling:

Instead they killed off the Stagea in favor of the Skyline Crossover.

I will be pondering of this thought for some time.

Just sold my CKV36 and seriously considering an NJ50 Crossover.

If only Nissan had made the Stagea with a VK56 and an interior like the V36 :whistling:

Instead they killed off the Stagea in favor of the Skyline Crossover.

I will be pondering of this thought for some time.

Fixed.

  • Like 1

The Skyline Crossover is simply too small compared to the Stagea!!!!

I WILL WRITE TO NISSAN AND COMPLAIN..

Dear Mr. Nissan,

Please make me an M36 Stagea with VQ37, 7 speed SAT or 6 speed manual and all the tricks found in your V36 Range of Skylines.

Your Skyline Crossover (Infiniti EX) is simply too small and your Infiniti FX, which is so very very nice, is just too expensive.

I cant find one for less than $59,000.

If you wont make me my very own M36 Stagea then I will have no choice but to consider buying a near new VF Crumbadore SSV Redline or wait another 12 months for a few more used Infiniti FX's to pop up.

Yours Sincerely.

Former owner of V36 370 GT and proud owner of M35 ARX (200,000 kms on the horizon)

The Skyline Crossover is simply too small compared to the Stagea!!!!

I WILL WRITE TO NISSAN AND COMPLAIN..

Dear Mr. Nissan,

Please make me an M36 Stagea with VR38DETT and/or VK56VETT 6 speed AWD manual ONLY and all the tricks found in your V36 Range of Skylines.

Your Skyline Crossover (Infiniti EX) is simply too small and your Infiniti FX, which is so very very nice, is just too expensive.

I cant find one for less than $59,000.

If you wont make me my very own M36 Stagea then I will have no choice but to consider buying a near new VF Crumbadore SSV Redline and drive it into a wall or wait another 12 months for a few more used Infiniti FX's to pop up.

Yours Sincerely.

Former owner of V36 370 GT and proud owner of M35 ARX (200,000 kms on the horizon)

Wrong engine choices are wrong!! :P

Fixed.

Edited by M35woah

I just don't get why people think the VQ37 is a lesser engine to the VR38. It has a much more impressive head/cam design with constantly variable intake exhaust and lift. The much simpler VR38 is essentially a stroked VQ35 with egr.

Same thing I see with the RB26, just because it's in a 'GTR' it must smash all the competition. Well imo the RB26 is a crappy old engine designed in WW2 for Jap tanks. Love them all you like, nothing can change that fact.

I just don't get why people think the VQ37 is a lesser engine to the VR38. It has a much more impressive head/cam design with constantly variable intake exhaust and lift. The much simpler VR38 is essentially a stroked VQ35 with egr.

Same thing I see with the RB26, just because it's in a 'GTR' it must smash all the competition. Well imo the RB26 is a crappy old engine designed in WW2 for Jap tanks. Love them all you like, nothing can change that fact.

Turbos.

I just don't get why people think the VQ37 is a lesser engine to the VR38. It has a much more impressive head/cam design with constantly variable intake exhaust and lift. The much simpler VR38 is essentially a stroked VQ35 with egr.

Same thing I see with the RB26, just because it's in a 'GTR' it must smash all the competition. Well imo the RB26 is a crappy old engine designed in WW2 for Jap tanks. Love them all you like, nothing can change that fact.

Was just saying the VR38 because comes out the factory with turbo and I threw in the V8 with turbo because lets face it... If you're going to make a request may aswell make it the most ridiculous request ever right? I mean why stop at the VQ37?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
×
×
  • Create New...