Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

AS FOR YOU CO*K HEAD WATCH WHAT YOU TYPE!

I think it was a pretty fair call in terms of what he meant, it's pretty low to take a company that has put thousands of hours into R&D and proven results and then just copy the design to save a few dollers... Stao was pretty clear in his statement and i think he was pretty fair too!

AS FOR YOU CO*K HEAD WATCH WHAT YOU TYPE!

Stao you should try create some new wheels that match ir beat the hta comp wheels as Lithium mentioned. I always prefer to go local if I can. I just dont know what to do im not using the plain new gt3076 I have in the shed.

Don't drip stuff which is not relevant to this thread into it - this is about FP HTA turbos, not Hypergear, and not anyone copying or trying to compete with HTA. A relevant comparison (whether the HTA or the competitor outperforms doesn't matter - just something informative) would be good, be very interesting to get a Hypergear vs HTA comparison on the same dyno and setup for example... but otherwise, its just spam.

Get in touch with FP, or GTPumps - Josh.... pretty sure GTPumps do hybrids using HTA compressors, so maybe able to help.

Don't drip stuff which is not relevant to this thread into it - this is about FP HTA turbos, not Hypergear, and not anyone copying or trying to compete with HTA. A relevant comparison (whether the HTA or the competitor outperforms doesn't matter - just something informative) would be good, be very interesting to get a Hypergear vs HTA comparison on the same dyno and setup for example... but otherwise, its just spam.

Get in touch with FP, or GTPumps - Josh.... pretty sure GTPumps do hybrids using HTA compressors, so maybe able to help.

Would the quality and response of the GTpumps match with what FP are doing. Otherwise it would probably be worth it to just go straight to FP

The extra bit of boost is worth it in the mid isn't it. Must be impossible to keep it stuck down.

A lot of extra boost for not much gain... Honestly on 20psi its enough of a handful :D

I find it interesting that FP no longer offer twin scroll housings........

In other news - FP have released a Super 99 HTA turbo, a 103lb/min T3 flanged (hopefully they release other flange versions - but still) turbo capable of >1000hp. MENTAL!

http://store.forcedperformance.net/merchant2/merchant.mvc?Screen=PROD&Store_Code=FP&Product_Code=NTFPSUPER99&Category_Code=Turbo-FP



Oh, right... when the SUPER 94 isnt enough... lol :woot:

Edited by Tonba

I find it interesting that FP no longer offer twin scroll housings........

Oh, right... when the SUPER 94 isnt enough... lol :woot:

The super 94 is never enough! I am thinking of a super 99 for the van :P

34geetee, pitty it wont hold boost, what boost control you have?

Can make it hold boost if we really wanted too but no point creating the extra heat etc....

Adam explained it too me but it was over my head, i just smiled and nodded lol.... Basically it was done for longevity of the turbo and engine....

I had HKS EVC 5 and now Greddy Profec B II, funnily enough despite what all the reviews say the Greddy is better than the HKS on my car!

Matt cant your haltech control boost as well? May I ask why you use the greddy?

Josh

Yes the haltech can if the solenoid is added, we have always stuck with external boost control though, it was a decision made during the build and there was reasoning, i cant remember what it was though lol

Interesting - when I was looking around at boost controllers I found the Blitz Dual SBC seemed to be the overall best respected by people I trusted. With my playing around with cars so far I by far like "decent" aftermarket ECU in-built boost control setups... ie, the G4 Link boost control has been brilliant for me and I'd assume the Haltech would be no worse. Why not use that?

Interesting - when I was looking around at boost controllers I found the Blitz Dual SBC seemed to be the overall best respected by people I trusted. With my playing around with cars so far I by far like "decent" aftermarket ECU in-built boost control setups... ie, the G4 Link boost control has been brilliant for me and I'd assume the Haltech would be no worse. Why not use that?

I honestly dont remember man, it was a reason that i just cant recall lol

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...