Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

already a fair bit of cardio in the work out.

in theory you could go for a run on thursday, I personally feel that stop start sprinting would be the way to go, just go as hard as you can.

with the amount of work you do i wondering if you are getting enough calories, especially protein. can you eat nuts? add a scoop of vanilla protein in your breaky smoothie, lower the carb at dinner and increase the meat

below is a sample diet for a fitness model Bella Falconi 5ft 2 @ 52kg:

  • Meal 1: 2 slices of Ezekiel Bread (low sodium) with 2 tbsp. of Almond Butter, 6 Egg Whites and 1 scoop of Isolate Whey Protein
  • Meal 2: 1 Sweet Potato, 10 Asparagus and 5 oz. of chicken breast
  • Meal 3: 1/4 cup of Quinoa, 1 fillet of Orange Roughy and Salad
  • Meal 4: 4 oz. of Ground the sphincter of the universe Breast, 1 Sweet Potato and 10 Asparagus
  • Meal 5: Omelette made with 6 Eggs, 2 slices of low sodium the sphincter of the universe, Cherry Tomatoes, Onions and Broccoli
  • Meal 6: 80g of air popped Popcorn and 2 scoops of Isolate Whey Protein with water

http://www.simplyshredded.com

I know that you're a vegetarian, just to give you an idea of how much she consumes

22.jpg

My thoughts is that Birds is thinking you arent eating enough to support growth, I could be wrong he would need to confirm.

I have a friend (unfortunately male) but his diet was terrible, less then what I eat, his workouts however were brutal this was due to his history from boxing. The minute he started eating half decently, he packed on the weight and is looking better then ever.

I am no expert Leesh, just throwing a couple ideas at you. I would seriously consider if possible, dumping on of those cardio classes and going and doing pole dancing (surely there is a dance studio semi close to where you live or work that offers it). its all core strength and I can atess to the results it provides

Hi Mitch I can eat some nuts, allergic to peacans, walnuts and pistachios. I eat nuts when I can such as in a trial mix as a snack.

I did write up my diet earlier. I used IIFYM to find out my daily macro count a little while ago and I should be consuming 2000 calories a day (which I do). I should be consuming 127g of protein a day (I exceed this) and 38g of fat a day (I'm usually around 30 to 35g a day) Carbs 247.5g a day (sometimes I exceed this) and fibre 26-30g a day (which I do)

I really don't think I need to eat any more protein as consuming around 140g a day with no meat.

I think I eat more in a day than the sample diet of the fitness model you just wrote up. I think I may be eating too much, hence why I'm not getting much more definition.

I'll look into pole dancing. If they have a time slot that I can fit in around my schedule I will do it.

Thanks for your help.

28/10/13

Lat Pulldown

30kg x 10

40kg x 10

45kg x 10

50kg x 10

55kg x 9

60kg x 5

65kg x 1

Shoulder Press

15kg x 10

15kg x 10

15kg x 10

20kg x 10

20kg x 8

25kg x 3

25kg x 3

Seated Row

30kg x 10

35kg x 10

40kg x 10

45kg x 10

Ab Crunches

100

55 min boxing @ 511 calories

Edited by L33SH

That fitness model is not good looking imo, too masculine, but I realise that's personal preference and probs what's needed to win/be selected for shoots etc.

Damn Leesh, you train a heap!

I agree with your opinion on the fitness model, abs are nice though.

Yeah I do, however anything cardio is a walk in the park for me, except Sundays grit session... That is hardcore, to the point of feeling like I'm going to vomit.

I took last night off training, mentally and physically not well atm. Usually I would just go but the thought of going made me anxious so I might have the next few days off as well. I guess it's a mixture of things happening in my life atm and how I'm feeling about myself that's bringing me down.

Edited by L33SH

Still can't get myself to miss a session of body attack (aerobics) on Tuesday nights. I can be dying and I still have to go. I came out of hospital earlier this year drugged up to the eyeballs and went straight to attack, in hindsight that was one of the stupidest things I've done.

After my 6 to 8 weeks out I will never train injured again, I know I made it so much worse. This week my shoulder has been feeling close to 100% back to normal, so happy! Only hurts when I wake up and I still can't sleep on that side.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...