Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

high all,, I got a gtr with the above turbos,

its forged internals and minor head work, still standed cams and valves,

power-fc tuned to 380hp at 15psi,

blead up with gfb bleed tap,

I will be going to a electric boost controller at some point but problem I have it I have nothing under 3500rpm, no real pull until 4000rpm when boost comes on,, I went with the dash 7's over the 5's due to lag, tho I think this turbos are lagy as hell, ??

if I fall off boost there is nearly no power at all, is this normal for the -7??

I no a EBC will help it get on boost sooner tho this seems like a lot of lag?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/429128-rb26-2860-7-slow-to-boost/
Share on other sites

has base timing been looked at? my new engine from japan was 10 degrees advanced and was VERY laggy.

put it back to 20deg BTDC and it's running perfect.

you'd think the Japs would know how to get it right but you'd be surprised.

The adjustable actuators with any more than about 2-3 turns worth of preload will give more than 17psi boost.

I found out this morning...I'm still yet to tinker with my profec b 2 but am confident that if I have standard preload on the -9 actuators

and adjust the start boost high enough, it will give me my 15psi that I want, nice and early. Which sounds like what you're trying to achieve.

You should have about 7psi by 3000 and 15psi by about 3900. You could try disconnecting the boost signal to the actuators and plugging the line then go for a CAREFUL run up to say 3500 or 4000 to see if the boost comes on any better. Dont go further than this as boost will keep climbing! If you notice boost building better, then an EBC should help.

-7s come with adjustable actuators standard so check the preload on the actuators - usually 1cm is a good start. Then apply some air pressure to them via the common feed line to make sure they open the same amount at the same time.

If one turbo is spooling and the other isn't you can get shenanigans like shuffling happening. It's basically the early turbo forcing the turbo that is dragging its heels into surge by increasing the downstream pressure above what it would be if the slack turbo was running by itself.

Edited by GTSBoy

also cam timing will increase off boost power and bring turbos on sooner

you say forged motor what is the comp ratio ?, base timing, as stated already, makes a big difference

check the actuators are set correctly and a EBC will also bring turbos on sooner by reducing waste gate creep

what exhaust do you have ?

is there a rag in your intercooler ?

hi all,, it is lowerd compresson but im not 100% sure to what, I haven't checked the cam timming tho will, maby a set of adjusterball cams?

timming was set at tune, if I remember im seen a max of about 43deg timming on boost? id have to check again,

iv tried to set the wastegate's tho the actuator adjusters seem to be pressed onto the threaded sharft? it still has a lock nut on the thread, no mater how hard I tried I couldnot turn the rods on the threads, they are genuan brand new garret turbos, exhurst is a hks 3.75" fullsystem , 3.75 high flow cat,

the rag, youv put the fear of god into me but im 100%% sure there is no rag I left in there :P

I once found a 13mm spanner in the BOV return pipe

Lowered comp ratio will make turbo spool later and make it feel sluggish off boost

A set of cam gears tuned for response will help to

hahahaa thats gold!

loosen up the nut and remove the circlip carefully at the end of the rod (magnet the circlip to stop it flying off), then adjust the rod

iv tried to set the wastegate's tho the actuator adjusters seem to be pressed onto the threaded sharft? it still has a lock nut on the thread, no mater how hard I tried I couldnot turn the rods on the threads, they are genuan brand new garret turbos, exhurst is a hks 3.75" fullsystem , 3.75 high flow cat,

loosen up the nut and remove the circlip carefully at the end of the rod (magnet the circlip to stop it flying off), then adjust the rod

did exactly this, still no bingo on eather turbo,

my 13mm is accounted for so its not that haha, I do think its the decomp motor that is it,, on my standed twins I wasent making fullboost till about 3500-4000 eather, so cams/cam gears it is,

  • 1 year later...

well this is old ;)

, come along way since then, engine is striped down, getting 87mm wiseco pistons as no6 piston took one for the team,

im going to pumping the boost into this set up, just wating for a spanking new crank to turn up then rebuilt time, ( had been ground to much in the past)

responce is my aim for this, i now have adjusterbull cam gears, still running the -7s( going to set 15psi gate press, then up with a eboost), what cam deg/lift would be a good combo for this?

looking to run around the 20-25psi range with flowing mods,

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
    • So I found this: https://www.efihardware.com/temperature-sensor-voltage-calculator I didn't know what the pullup resistor is. So I thought if I used my table of known values I could estimate it by putting a value into the pullup resistor, and this should line up with the voltages I had measured. Eventually I got this table out of it by using 210ohms as the pullup resistor. 180C 0.232V - Predicted 175C 0.254V - Predicted 170C 0.278V - Predicted 165C 0.305V - Predicted 160C 0.336V - Predicted 155C 0.369V - Predicted 150C 0.407V - Predicted 145C 0.448V - Predicted 140C 0.494V - Predicted 135C 0.545V - Predicted 130C 0.603V - Predicted 125C 0.668V - Predicted 120C 0.740V - Predicted 115C 0.817V - Predicted 110C 0.914V - Predicted 105C 1.023V - Predicted 100C 1.15V 90C 1.42V - Predicted 85C 1.59V 80C 1.74V 75C 1.94V 70C 2.10V 65C 2.33V 60C 2.56V 58C 2.68V 57C 2.70V 56C 2.74V 55C 2.78V 54C 2.80V 50C 2.98V 49C 3.06V 47C 3.18V 45C 3.23V 43C 3.36V 40C 3.51V 37C 3.67V 35C 3.75V 30C 4.00V As before, the formula in HPTuners is here: https://www.hptuners.com/documentation/files/VCM-Scanner/Content/vcm_scanner/defining_a_transform.htm?Highlight=defining a transform Specifically: In my case I used 50C and 150C, given the sensor is supposedly for that. Input 1 = 2.98V Output 1 = 50C Input 2 = 0.407V Output 2 = 150C (0.407-2.98) / (150-50) -2.573/100 = -0.02573 2.98/-0.02573 + 47.045 = 50 So the corresponding formula should be: (Input / -0.02573) + 47.045 = Output.   If someone can confirm my math it'd be great. Supposedly you can pick any two pairs of the data to make this formula.
×
×
  • Create New...