Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

As I'm the final throes of getting my car ready for the track, I've been looking into upcoming events to get some track time. For the most part, it seems like I can get away with the cheaper and easier to obtain AASA licence, as the SSCC Supersprint at SMSP only requires AASA, and as far as I can tell so do most other supersprints and club track days.

So what would I need an L2S for? Apart from being more expensive, it's also a pain in the ass to obtain. What's the benefit?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/429975-cams-l2s-or-aasa/
Share on other sites

I have both, the L2S was really easy to get... Just costs more!

I had to get the L2S to run with the hillclimb series, if the AASA covers everything you want to enter then i dont see any disadvantage to having it :)

Cams L2S you can do hill climbs, sprints, drift, motorkhana's etc

AASA club level will only do track days and sprints at some tracks.

some tracks in NSW are now pretty much only Wakefield and SMP south. SMP south it all depends on the club running the day.

for example,

MX5 club (homo's! haha) run on SMP south but through CAMS, of course the CAMS supersprint series is by CAMS.

SSCC, Festival of Sporting Cars run under AASA at SMP South. the other SMP tracks (North, GP, Brabham) are on CAMS.

so really, what events do you want to run?

dont think there is an events calander out for next year yet so hard to forecast what events to run.

for me, I ditched my L2S as I wasnt doing hill climbs, only door to door through MRA and FoSC which are all AASA.

$100 bucks for AASA racing, or $110? for a sprint licence from CAMS...!

I believe that for club track day the AASA $50 license is fine. But for CAMS you have to have L2S (>80kph).

Also you have to get CAMS through being a member of a CAMS club. SAU NSW is a CAMS club so you can obtain through us.

Best to go to the websites and read the info on their forms.

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 10 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...