Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Im looking at getting some swaybars for the 32gtst. it is becoming a track car, not a drifter, so i want to buy the right ones.

Selby looks good as i can order what i want.

However i dont know what to order.

Obviously blade adjustable, but what sizes front and rear for a good balance?

I know this subject has been covered (yes i searched a lot), but its basic info, for street use, and whiteline are different to selby.

I dont know if theres anything else relevant. Silvers neomax suspension, solid cradle bushes(thats another question, change? what to?), hicas gone, adjustable this and that.

Thanks.

post-89755-0-93179700-1376804838_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/430436-r32-gtst-swaybars/
Share on other sites

It's not hard. For really stiff result, put 27 adjustable on the front, 24 adjustable on the rear. You'll probably end up with the front one adjusted away from full stiff and the rear one at max stiffness. For less of a max stifness effort, 24 adjustable front and rear, with the rear probably set to the softer end and the front at the stiffer end. Although those recommendations will really be affected by the relative spring rates.

Realistically, unless you are a race team with budget, you cannot make this "correct" with just one setup anyway. Some will argue that the right way to set up suspension for the circuit is to use the lightest bars you can. The bars are just used for tuning the handling balance. The overall roll resistance is obtained by selecting stiff arse springs. But even then that's a hassle, because bumpy tracks and smooth tracks require different compromises between spring and ani-roll bars (note there's no such thing as a swaybar on a car that's not towing a trailer). And driver preference has a lot to do with it too. You may have two cars in the same team (so the same technical backup on both, with the same engineer) and the two drivers might end up with opposite spring/bar setups and still set similar times. Make them swap cars and they will both go slower.

Yes ill always be a noob racer, but im getting enjoyment from messing with my car. you know what i mean. ;)

So 27 f 24 r is a good all round starting point

Ok, basically in general front stiffer than rear

Right?

haha good point....the quality has never quite been the same since they started manufacturing offshore :(

from memory Roy had some trouble with whiteline bars on this 32

correct, he went to Cuscos.

Nope, and sometimes onshore they would measure from the wrong side of the bar bwahahaha

Yuh, my experience mirrors the above. Front and rear 24mm bars just fell onto my R32. Only hassle with the rear one was it would have helped me to get the car further off the ground before starting work! Granted, I had to put the chassis mount bushes for the front bar onto the wire wheel to remove enough material to make them fit into the D brackets, but I don't take that sort of obstacle seriously.

Sorry to hijack thread but also interested in getting some sway bars down the track..

No drifting.. :)

Question is, how can I identify what sway bars are already ON the car? They look stock to me and can't find any markings.

Edit: Maybe get some vernier calliper's and measure how thick they are?

Edited by Zrobe

You can just measure the thickness, but that might not tell the whole story. The stock front bars on R32s are hollow, hence they are much lighter than a similar sized solid and also somewhat less stiff than a similar sized solid. It is not possible to know exactly how thick the walls are on these hollow bars though, so it's not possible to calculate hoe stiff they are relative to a different sized aftermarket bar. If you have or can make a rig to test how stiff they are then you can compare them. Making such a rig is not super difficult, it's just a lot more work than most people are willing to put into it.

FWIW, my (originally) auto R32 (also a 1993) had a 16mm solid rear and a 22mm hollow front.

You can just measure the thickness, but that might not tell the whole story. The stock front bars on R32s are hollow, hence they are much lighter than a similar sized solid and also somewhat less stiff than a similar sized solid. It is not possible to know exactly how thick the walls are on these hollow bars though, so it's not possible to calculate hoe stiff they are relative to a different sized aftermarket bar. If you have or can make a rig to test how stiff they are then you can compare them. Making such a rig is not super difficult, it's just a lot more work than most people are willing to put into it.

FWIW, my (originally) auto R32 (also a 1993) had a 16mm solid rear and a 22mm hollow front.

Okay, no worries thanks heaps.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Even with the piston at TDC there was room for it to drop, but I don't think it can drop fully into the cylinder, the problem you have is that you need something pushing against the valve to hold it up so you have enough room to put the new stem seal on and the spring etc.  I used compressed air only because putting rope in the cylinder seemed a bit risky to me, I know people have done it countless times before like this. Overall it's a pain in the ass job. Honestly you'd probably be better off taking the head off because the risk of dropping something in the engine and the finicky-ness of it all is very stressful. If you are going to attempt it though i 10000% recommend a 36050 valve spring/keeper tool. I had both the traditional lever type and after doing 1 cylinder it was absolute pain to get those valve keepers in place, even with 2 people. That 36050 is amazing, you do have to push hard to get them in place but it works perfectly almost every time. Back to my actual issue I think my engine is just tired and old and the rings have gone bad. The comp numbers (cold, no oil) were: Cyl 1 -129psi Cyl 2 - 133psi Cyl 3 - 138psi Cyl 4 - 137psi Cyl 5 - 157psi Cyl 6 - 142psi   Cylinder 5 and 6 having the most carbon on them.
    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
×
×
  • Create New...