Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 87
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

My mechanic and i have spoke about turbo choice, we are going ahead with the garret gtx3076r.

Thanks for your help hypergear and thanks to any one from the skyline australia forum for helping out also.

Hmmmm just don't know ! Nothing wrong with that choice, i run it! but a hyper gear would be awsome combo on your car, what rear housing you going to run? you going internal or external gate?

Well I believe there is a strong Bias on his engine builder as many older timers did grew up with the company, even thou I do not agree that it is a better choice for factory manifold and internal gate, but I respect their decisions.

As developments continues, I will make sure the SS internally gated series are always a better bolton option for the Nissan Rb25det engines.

I run the same turbo, the GTX is only a good choice for someone planning on running 25+ psi, otherwise the GT or a Hypergear is a better option imo.

It is a fairly laggy 400kw on e85 turbo choice. What do you want out of your setup?

Just saw he wants to run x frame mine is gt 3076r not to laggy at all with a .63 external and manual lol makes good power, but will expect it to nose over soon on the next time hopefully get 350+ out of it b4 it does , but there are much better choices out there now, more response, better flow, I know I will be changing to some thing else one day soon, but just like to see where I can push this combo too first .

2000 rs you have spent massive $$$ on that stag now and deserve to make good power so be very very careful on turbo choice and who you take advice from . There are ppl on here who are specifically in tune with stagea's and rb engines and turbo choice too suit . You've also got too look at what power delivery you want , do you want a dyno queen lag monster or something that will actually get the stag up and moving street style, do you want a linier v8 style power delivery or do you want a head snap . Be careful on what path you choose

And mechanic so strongly in favour of one turbo over another (when the one he's against is arguably the best choice) isn't a mechanic worth taking your car to.

Seriously, for what you want I doubt you'll find a better turbo than a HG. There are lots of results out there which demonstrate how perfect HGs are for RBs. If your mechanic isn't confident using one, then he has a problem, not the turbo.

I vote find a new mechanic

4bidn1 has a a 3076 56t ,63 same setup/gate on stockyband he had auto aswell

i have hypergear g3with old bigger 58t comp wheel/bigger turbine/bigger .82 exhaust housing

now lets guess which one has way more power under 3800rpm

the 3076 woudnt even make 1psi on a stock converter..

of course you workshop woudnt know this...

remember you have to move a big heavy car. Good ole adelaide

workshops..lol

Hmmmm just don't know ! Nothing wrong with that choice, i run it! but a hyper gear would be awsome combo on your car, what rear housing you going to run? you going internal or external gate?

.82

internal wastegate.

Dont want the cops to have a heart attack when they pop the bonnet.........

Edited by 2000 RS

I run the same turbo, the GTX is only a good choice for someone planning on running 25+ psi, otherwise the GT or a Hypergear is a better option imo.

It is a fairly laggy 400kw on e85 turbo choice. What do you want out of your setup?

I am running forged pistons, plan on getting mv auto to strengthen my trans and put a stall converter in..........

And mechanic so strongly in favour of one turbo over another (when the one he's against is arguably the best choice) isn't a mechanic worth taking your car to.

Seriously, for what you want I doubt you'll find a better turbo than a HG. There are lots of results out there which demonstrate how perfect HGs are for RBs. If your mechanic isn't confident using one, then he has a problem, not the turbo.

I vote find a new mechanic

The workshop im sending my car too works mostly with rb engines, they have drift cars also.

They have worked with alot of HG turbos, they say they cant get no where near the figures HG have posted on the net Plus the front housing on HG turbos are to big for my application as i am not running a top mounted turbo.

What figures do they get on their Garrett range?

Just on that, are you buying the turbo from them?

With the gt3076 they make around 330rwk on a manual.

And yes they are getting the turbo in for me, i payed a deposit today. the gtx3076r is $2450

The gt3076 is $2050

You pay for what you get these days i guess.

well not really..you got assf**ked by bill with your first turbo, assf**ked by your engine builder

theres plenty of info here to tell you why the gtx3076 woudn't be a good thing for what you want

but you seem to like to get spoon fed,your the type of customer workshops dream about..lol

money doesn't buy brains sadly

Edited by jet_r31

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I think the concept is highlighting the various scenarios where thicker oil helps, and thicker oil potentially doesn't help and only generates heat and costs power, in turn for safety which isn't actually any safer (unless you're going real hot). If anything this does highlight why throwing Castrol 10w-60 for your track days is always a solid, safe bet. 
    • Jason should have shown a real viscosity vs temp chart. All the grades have very little viscosity difference at full operating temperature.
    • Oops... I meant to include the connector  view... BR/W - power from fuse L/W - motor negative to fan control amp (and off to HVAC pin19) OR/B - PWM signal (from HVAC pin20) B --  ground  
    • Yep, if you are applying filler it sounds like there is something wrong with the body lol. Safe to assume there is going to be a lot of sanding going on if your still applying fillers.  Picture a perfect bare metal panel, smooth as glass. You lay down your primer, it's perfect. (why are you going to sand it?) You lay down the colour and clear, it's perfect. No sanding at all took place and you've got a perfectly finished panel.  You won't be chasing your tail, sounds like you were prepping to start laying filler. If your happy with the body after the sanding, there is some bare metal exposed and some areas with primer, no issues at all, start laying the filler. You are safe to lay filler on bare metal or primer (of course check your technical data sheet as usual for what your filler is happy to adhere to).  This isn't a 100% correct statement. There is primer that is happy to adhere to smooth bare metal. There are fillers that are happy to adhere to smooth bare metal. Just make sure you're using the right materials for the job.  Typically if you are using filler, you would go primer, colour and clear. I've never seen any instances before where someone has laid colour over body filler (maybe this happens, but I haven't seen it before). So your plan sounds pretty normal to me. 
    • I don't think there's any way someone is push starting this car.. I honestly can barely move it, and moving it and steering it is just flat out not possible. I'm sure it is, but needs a bigger man than me. I have a refurbished starter now. The starter man was quite clear and consise showing me how nothing inside a starter really should contribute to slow cranking, and turned out that for the most part... my starter was entirely fine. Still, some of the wear items were replaced and luckily it didn't show any signs of getting too hot, being unfit for use, etc. Which is 'good'. I also noticed the starter definitely sounded different, which is a bit odd considering nothing should have really changed there.... Removed and refit, and we'll pretend one of the manifold bolts didn't fully tighten up and is only "pretty" tight. GM only wants 18ft/lb anyway. I also found a way to properly get my analog wideband reading very slightly leaner than the serial wideband. There's Greg related reasons for this. The serial output is the absolute source of truth, but it is a total asshole to actually stay connected and needs a laptop. The analog input does not, and works with standalone datalogging. Previously the analog input read slightly richer, but if I am aiming at 12.7 I do not want one of the widebands to be saying 12.7 when the source of truth is 13.0. Now the source of truth will be 12.65 and the Analog Wideband will read 12.7. So when I tune to 12.7 it'll be ever so slightly safer. While messing with all of this and idling extensively I can confirm my car seems to restart better while hot now. I did add an old Skyline battery cable between the head and the body though, though now I really realise I should have chosen the frame. Maybe that's a future job. The internet would have you believe that this is caused by bad grounds. In finding out where my grounds actually were I found out the engine bay battery post actually goes to the engine, as well as a seperate one (from the post) to the body of the car. So now there's a third one making the Grounding Triangle which is now a thing. I also from extensive idling have this graph. Temperature (°C) Voltage (V) 85 1.59 80 1.74 75 1.94 70 2.1 65 2.33 60 2.56 55 2.78 50 2.98 45 3.23 40 3.51 35 3.75 30 4.00   Plotted it looks like this. Which is actually... pretty linear? I have not actually put the formula into HPTuners. I will have to re-engage brain and/or re-engage the people who wanted more data to magically do it for me. Tune should be good for the 30th!
×
×
  • Create New...