Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey i have taken my BOV off my car, and i was wondering what methods people use after they have done this.

I simply got a plate made up that screws over the outlet on the engine.

I know you can place the stock BOV back on, but i choose not to do this.

just wondering how everyone else did theres, just so i know if there is a different way then what i did.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/43157-bov-blocking/
Share on other sites

Mate... I had no blow off valve at all. But i makes a funny noise of chopping air as the compressed air passes back over the impella. This not only puts pressure on the impeller but it makes the noise of a blow off valve anyways. The police were gonna write me a ticket for having a loud blow off valve and when i popped the bonnet and show them there was none. They told me to put a standard one on because they make very little noise. If i didnt then next time they will fine me....

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/43157-bov-blocking/#findComment-881068
Share on other sites

I took my BOV due to my readings about them. and my personal beliefs about them.

when running no BOV (not even a tock) .. you do get the flutter of the waste gate, this is why nissan placed a stock BOV on there cars to get rid of the sound.

the logic behind this is ...

the older people want a family car that doesnt drive around making pigion noises.

if any of that makes sense?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/43157-bov-blocking/#findComment-881104
Share on other sites

Mic Sky - Well one of the houses (the fatter one) has a cap on the end

and the thinner one is currently cut right back with a bolt in the end of it.

I am going down to a few shops tomorrow and seeing if i can get a cap for the thinner hose.

if not im goilg to weld a little nipple/knob on to the flat custom cover so it just stays blocked and plugs in there .. just so it looks neater.

I will take a photo to explain what i mean when i get it done :)

heh .. sorry

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/43157-bov-blocking/#findComment-881108
Share on other sites

I was under the Impression that a bov was fitted to give the turbo longlivity, to reduce the back pressure over the impella which puts stress on the turbo, not so some old fart could drive in peace, if you where running the stock intake box then you wouldn't hear much sound with or without the stock bov....

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/43157-bov-blocking/#findComment-881127
Share on other sites

Good point...

However im unsure how much longlivity it would give wiht or with out a bov.

Not to sure how a plum back bov works, im a bit rusty on that knowledge ..

but wouldnt that be doing the same thing as runnign with no bov?

eg: putting the pressure/air back through the turbo?

i think i might go do some reading on this so ..

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/43157-bov-blocking/#findComment-881131
Share on other sites

Plumback = venting excess boosted air through the bov back into the turbo inlet pipe, a stock setup and a ' legal ' setup is plumback.

When you are running no bov you get chopping of the compressed air going back over the impella, think of it like this, if you run no bov exhaust gas is trying to push the turbine blade one dirrection, and the boosted air has nowhere to escape but back through the impella pushing its way back through it going the exact opposite direction as the air is supposed to be travelling thus putting stress in the turbo, exhaust gas pushing one way, excess boost pushing the other way, something has to fail unless the access air has somewhere to go when the throttle is closed.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/43157-bov-blocking/#findComment-881135
Share on other sites

Good point...

However im unsure how much longlivity it would give wiht or with out a bov.

Not to sure how a plum back bov works, im a bit rusty on that knowledge ..

but wouldnt that be doing the same thing as runnign with no bov?

eg: putting the pressure/air back through the turbo?

i think i might go do some reading on this so ..

not using a BOV will not only shorten the life of your Turbo but will also cause the turbo to slow down between throttle off's, hence making it feel laggy as the wheel needs to pick up speed again when you get back on to the loud peddle..
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/43157-bov-blocking/#findComment-883185
Share on other sites

lets see if i have this right, (sound/wankfactor aside)...anything ive missed?

Atmos BOV:

For:

1) keeps turbo happy

2) less gear change lag than all (with a/m computer)

3) doesnt insert hot (from compression) air back into intake

Against:

1) afm counts more air then really there - need aftermarket computer to stop rich gear changes

2) illegal (due to emissions, ie running rich on gear changes?, and/or noise pollution?)

Plumback BOV:

For:

1) keeps turbo happy

2) less gear change lag than no bov?

3) doesnt mess up afm readings, wont make run any richer on gear changes

4) legal

Against:

1) inserts hot air into intake, (= slightly less power due to less air density)

No BOV

For:

1) more legal than atmos (may be illegal due to emissions on gear change?)

Either way:

1) mildly heats air into intake, not as much as plumback (from chopping + recompression of air that went back thru turbo)

Against:

1) turbo wont be happy due to chopping

2) gear change lag

3) counts air twice on gear change (= runs rich unless a/m computer?)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/43157-bov-blocking/#findComment-883427
Share on other sites

Lol ill back up that avatar too :)

Ive found running now BOV has stopped my car from runnign rich.

im still investigating the pros and cons.

Every Bov leaks... find me one that 100% has no leaking ever and you can be my australian idol :)

so you loose power there.

In short the only happy solution its seems is to run a plumb back blow off valve.

any even if it put hot air though your turbo, unless you doing some serious racing, i feel this is really irrelevant.

I feel in the long run. if your running a stock turbo at stock boost any of these peoblems listed above are much of a nothing.

but thanks for the info guys. keeping me educated :)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/43157-bov-blocking/#findComment-883892
Share on other sites

Hi when you have got two blow off valves like i have (R33GTS-T) a stock one and an aftermarket one is it at all posible to remove the stock bov,cover it over accordingly,plug up the recirculation holes in the intake pipe and have no problems with the cars performance whatsoever?or would it be better to just replace the pipe going over the motor all together???...........It is also my knowledge that if the bov doesnt retain the recirculation that it is fineable by the epa and the police all because of the oil mist that runs through the intake pipes being thrown out into the atmosphere with an externally venting bov.Much like the oil catch can enclosed (ok) externally vented (not ok)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/43157-bov-blocking/#findComment-885815
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...