Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys

Last week I had my cams dialled in (HKS 272s) and then put on the dyno for an E85 tune. Relevant mods are:

GT35R

Turbosmart 50mm progate (located not up top but down near cross member)

6boost manifold

I received a call on Friday afternoon from the tuner to say that they weren't able to control the boost and they had to take it off the dyno. The car has always had a bit of a boost creep issue, though the problem seems to have been exacerbated by the cam dialling in and the ethanol (don't know how though). It was suggested to me that the wastegate wasn't handling the new setup well and that it might be faulty.

So, could it be that the wastegate is faulty and somehow whatever fault it had before has been really brought to the fore now?

Or, could it be that the wastegate is in the wrong position? I often see wastegates up near the turbo however whoever installed mine has it right down underneath the manifold and turbo, almost near the cross member...just looks wrong to me.

Weird that it went so bad after the cam degreeing and the change to E85...

Any input appreciated.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/432930-e85-now-boost-creep-issue/
Share on other sites

Yeah, of course. It all depends on whether the WG offtake in your exhaust manifold is well done or not. It it is poorly located in some way then it won't flow as well as it should, and even a big fat 50mm gate won't help.

Given that it's a 6Boost manifold, it shouldn't be that wrong. Has it been modified to put the gate where it is, or was it originally laid out that way? Got photos of it off the car?

I've taken a couple of pics tonight of the setup and attached.

You can see that the pipe to the wastegate exits the manifold near the collector then takes a 90 degree bend downwards to follow the dump pipe. I don't think the manifold itself has been modified in any way but I'm guessing the wastegate was originally intended to be fitted quite near to the collector? Only problem is, I don't see that there's a massive amount of room to fit the WG, which is probably why they've mounted it so low down. Excuse the oil in one of the pics, had an oil leak which was fixed last week.

post-132-0-24794500-1381073157_thumb.jpg

post-132-0-41382400-1381073167_thumb.jpg

post-132-0-23341500-1381073188_thumb.jpg

what kind of boost control are you using? is the wastegate set up properly using both ports? 50mm gate and that positioning should be perfectly fine.

I'm using a Greddy Profec B Spec 2 and yes I believe the gate is using both ports.

Do you have the graph? What boost wat is running, and what did it climb to?

Originally i.e. before the E85 tune it was running around 20psi. Apparently it climbed to about 1.6 bar and they couldnt stop it, the boost just wanted to keep climbing. I didn't get a graph of this most recent trip unfortunately as they pulled it before doing much of a tune and sent it home on a flatbed.

I emailed Kyle from 6boost and he suggested removing any extra springs in the WG and leaving a 7psi spring in it as extra springs limit the valve travel and can make boost creep even worse. I don't know what spring(s) is in there at the moment but would this help?

Haha mine did the same thing man, though I don't have a 6boob, just gate off the turbo housing. But it's always held boost dead flat on 98, then had the flex fuel done and it now creeps from 21psi to 25psi. My tuner thinks the wastegate is too small (Turbosmart CompGate 40) and the screamer pipe coming off at a 90 degree angle isn't good for flow. So I will sort those out, but they have always been like that and always held boost very well prior to the ethanol.

Yeh your exit pipe is much better than mine. Mine is a sharp 90 degree angle, straight out of the wastegate:

407033_10150508796792541_256391112_n.jpg

Horrible for flow. My fabricator has had all the stuff to make me a proper one for well over a year now, but between him being busy and my car not running, I haven't managed to get it done yet. I'll do it before finishing off the full E85 tune and see if it helps, but the fact that it never had an issue on 98 fuel is puzzling.

Haha mine did the same thing man, though I don't have a 6boob, just gate off the turbo housing. But it's always held boost dead flat on 98, then had the flex fuel done and it now creeps from 21psi to 25psi. My tuner thinks the wastegate is too small (Turbosmart CompGate 40) and the screamer pipe coming off at a 90 degree angle isn't good for flow. So I will sort those out, but they have always been like that and always held boost very well prior to the ethanol.

Such a pain eh! So weird that it happens when introducing ethanol. That bend on yours does look rather nasty mate! :)

Just spoke to the workshop, he said bring it back and he's going to pull the wastegate off and give it a bit of an overhaul, change the spring in it and then we'll get it back on the dyno. He said he's had a number of cars over the years with the wastegate in that position and he hasn't had a problem so he reckons the wastegate is definitely the problem - could have a sticky valve he thinks.

Why didn't he just do that instead of sending it back on a truck? That's kinda annoying that he knew it was something simple but didn't do it.

To be fair 'the workshop' and 'the tuner' are two separate businesses so the workshop did the cam stuff and cam belt change and the tuner was doing the re -tune. Ah well! Will get the springs looked at and go from there.

we are having the same issue on a mates car.

6 boost with a 50mm gate and gtx3582 and runs fine on 98 but as soon as we tried to get it on E85 it just spikes..

we figured it was the position of the wastegate as its at the back of the manifold too

havent sorted out wat to do just yet.. thinking of maybe running another gate at the front of the manifold or maybe just upgrading to a 60mm gate..

The GTX35 rear I posted above ran a 40mm gate, with absolutely no issues. You are correct, it is all about placement and flow, a 60mm gate may be exactly the same...

And let Kyle know his manifold won't hold boost well. Without everyone giving feedback he may never know his wastegate path design is flawed. I have dealt with too many of his mani's lately with similar issues, but apparently he is the guru and that can't be the problem...

The split pulse 6 boost manifold with twin 40mm gates worked fine, but what a bugger to fabricate.

But why would it be an issue on E85 and not 98? Mine worked well on 98 but not at all on E85. Is that because the extra fuel required with E85 means more exhaust gas, even at the same power level?

yer theres a lot more exhaust gasses with e85..

we did let him know and he said it was all in the tuning and it was left at that..

ive heard he was really up himself and always backs up his manifolds.. im all for feedback but only when it makes a diference..

ive personaly got a split pulse t4 6boost manifold and the wastegate is placed right in the middle of all the cylinders.. we are expecting this to work fine but wont find out for another coupe of weeks..

Edited by GTXR34

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Thanks for the reply mate. Well I really hope its a hose then not engine out job
    • But.... the reason I want to run a 60 weight is so at 125C it has the same viscosity as a 40 weight at 100C. That's the whole reason. If the viscosity changes that much to drop oil pressure from 73psi to 36psi then that's another reason I should be running an oil that mimics the 40 weight at 100C. I have datalogs from the dyno with the oil pressure hitting 73psi at full throttle/high RPM. At the dyno the oil temp was around 100-105C. The pump has a 70psi internal relief spring. It will never go/can't go above 70psi. The GM recommendation of 6psi per 1000rpm is well under that... The oil sensor for logging in LS's is at the valley plate at the back of  the block/rear of where the heads are near the firewall. It's also where the knock sensors are which are notable for 'false knock'. I'm hoping I just didn't have enough oil up top causing some chatter instead of rods being sad (big hopium/copium I know) LS's definitely heat up the oil more than RB's do, the stock vettes for example will hit 300F(150C) in a lap or two and happily track for years and years. This is the same oil cooler that I had when I was in RB land, being the Setrab 25 row oil cooler HEL thing. I did think about putting a fan in there to pull air out more, though I don't know if that will actually help in huge load situations with lots of speed. I think when I had the auto cooler. The leak is where the block runs to the oil cooler lines, the OEM/Dash oil pressure sender is connected at that junction and is what broke. I'm actually quite curious to see how much oil in total capacity is actually left in the engine. As it currently stands I'm waiting on that bush to adapt the sender to it. The sump is still full (?) of oil and the lines and accusump have been drained, but the filter and block are off. I suspect there's maybe less than 1/2 the total capacity there should be in there. I have noticed in the past that topping up oil has improved oil pressure, as reported by the dash sensor. This is all extremely sketchy hence wanting to get it sorted out lol.
    • I neglected to respond to this previously. Get it up to 100 psi, and then you'll be OK.
    • I agree with everything else, except (and I'm rethinking this as it wasn't setup how my brain first though) if the sensor is at the end of a hose which is how it has been recommended to isolate it from vibrations, then if that line had a small hole in, I could foresee potentially (not a fluid dynamic specialist) the ability for it to see a lower pressure at the sensor. But thinking through, said sensor was in the actual block, HOWEVER it was also the sensor itself that broke, so oil pressure may not have been fully reaching the sensor still. So I'm still in my same theory.   However, I 100% would be saying COOL THE OIL DOWN if it's at 125c. That would be an epic concern of mine.   Im now thinking as you did Brad that the knock detection is likely due to the bearings giving a bit more noise as pressure dropped away. Kinkstah, drop your oil, and get a sample of it (as you're draining it) and send it off for analysis.
    • I myself AM TOTALLY UNPREPARED TO BELIEVE that the load is higher on the track than on the dyno. If it is not happening on the dyno, I cannot see it happening on the track. The difference you are seeing is because it is hot on the track, and I am pretty sure your tuner is not belting the crap out of it on teh dyno when it starts to get hot. The only way that being hot on the track can lead to real ping, that I can think of, is if you are getting more oil (from mist in the inlet tract, or going up past the oil control rings) reducing the effective octane rating of the fuel and causing ping that way. Yeah, nah. Look at this graph which I will helpfully show you zoomed back in. As an engineer, I look at the difference in viscocity at (in your case, 125°C) and say "they're all the same number". Even though those lines are not completely collapsed down onto each other, the oil grades you are talking about (40, 50 and 60) are teh top three lines (150, 220 and 320) and as far as I am concerned, there is not enough difference between them at that temperature to be meaningful. The viscosity of 60 at 125°C is teh same as 40 at 100°C. You should not operate it under high load at high temperature. That is purely because the only way they can achieve their emissions numbers is with thin-arse oil in it, so they have to tell you to put thin oil in it for the street. They know that no-one can drive the car & engine hard enough on the street to reach the operating regime that demands the actual correct oil that the engine needs on the track. And so they tell you to put that oil in for the track. Find a way to get more air into it, or, more likely, out of it. Or add a water spray for when it's hot. Or something.   As to the leak --- a small leak that cannot cause near catastrophic volume loss in a few seconds cannot cause a low pressure condition in the engine. If the leak is large enough to drop oil pressure, then you will only get one or two shots at it before the sump is drained.
×
×
  • Create New...