Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Also it looks like you've hit some sort of flow restriction (possibly the rear housing as stated earlier) as it holds around the 500 rwkw mark for around 2500 rpm!

What intercooler are you running?

Perhaps down the track a little an EFR9180 with the 1.45 twin scroll will be the way to go to get more top end without sacrificing too much low end. This motor has achieved what I wanted it to do now though. The next two engines are where I'm going to pursue more power.

The intercooler is a genuine Nismo core and is most likely not the restriction, however its had a lot of miles on it and has had some decent stone strikes. It will be replaced most likely with a hypertune core at some stage.

The 6466 will go 550+kw easily if I up the MAP sensor to a 4 or 5 bar. The 525kw was far from being optimised. There was no point tuning it at the limit of the MAP sensor as the ability to detect an over boost situation no longer exists. The 30kw gain from just 2psi shows the engine is still waking up at this pressure level despite the top end drop off.

For the moment I am very happy with the setup. I want to make the car look a little more pretty next, in case someone wants to photograph it.

  • Like 1

I have confirmed the rev limit soft cut was 7500 RPM.

The two graphs on the dyno sheet were actually 4th gear 7500 rpm and 5th 6000 rpm pulls.

The 5th gear run was an aborted run due to an intake hose blowing off. It stopped at 6000 RPM. Trent switched to 4th gear after the hose blew off for the third time, and did the 4th gear pull.

The chart below is RPM vs KW and NM.

post-26553-0-20302500-1450185308_thumb.png

Edited by GTRNUR
  • 1 month later...

Nothing real significant at this stage. Ive been driving the car whenever its not raining, which hasn't been that often up here unfortunately.

When doing some maintenance today, I was under the car and discovered I've done a right front CV boot. Grease splattered all over my newly painted TE37s. Such is GTR ownership...

Machining of the next two blocks is coming along nicely. Billet main cams, ARP stud kits and girdle plates installed. Sleeving next week all going well.

  • 3 weeks later...

Hey Mate.. I'm definitely interested in getting one built. I'm in Mackay so not too far away, plus as mentioned in the other thread I have mates you might know.

I'm actually a tuner too. Are you taking orders yet?

Sorry no I'm not taking orders yet, but I can say that one of the two engines being built at the moment will be for sale. That is once we see our first 4 digit power figure in testing.

The price is going to be quite high as it is not a large production run, and also the two builds are being done with no expense spared. Every part is now custom built for huge strength. ARP625 studs throughout, pistons that cost more than a complete rebuild, special coatings and materials, and a couple more experimental refinements.

Here's a sneek peek of one of the bottom end's before sleeving. Steel billet main caps + girdle plate with 12mm studs. I am trialing a Platinum Racing girdle plate on the second engine.

post-26553-0-40326200-1455258092_thumb.jpg

  • Like 4

Hey Mate.. I'm definitely interested in getting one built. I'm in Mackay so not too far away, plus as mentioned in the other thread I have mates you might know.

I'm actually a tuner too. Are you taking orders yet?

Haha Jono, I see you found him, couldn't help yourself could you.

Haha Jono, I see you found him, couldn't help yourself could you.

ahaha yep. I am keen as hell. I would sort this out over 12 months. And this guy looks like he knows his shit. I would rather spend the same money on a RB34 than a RB28

  • 1 month later...

Not much to report on really. I'm getting used to driving the car, and have decided I want to fix what is holding back the current setup from making 800+ and having that utterly terrifying top end acceleration. So a few weeks ago I placed a few more orders and now the parts are rolling in.

In the short term I am sticking with the 6466 and have just got a 1.30 housing upgrade for it, to allow the engine to breath better in top end. From what the 3.4lt supra guys tell me, I'm going to notice very little drop in response, yet will gain power that climbs to redline. I'm will be maxing out the injectors too, so another fuel pump upgrade is again in order. I'm swapping out the 044's and am installing a pair of walbro 460's instead, having now worked out how to mount them so they prime properly.

Under the bonnet I've changed the oil separator to a custom Autech style oil unit of my own design. I use a cone at the high end for the can as the vapour outlet, and there is 5 layers of oil separation baffles inside the can, with a return to sump drain at the low side.

On the next two engine front, I have the cylinder head for the lower spec motor now. Ported, +1/+1, Tomei 280/11.5's with supertech valves and springs. I'm still having a hold up with big cylinder head. Parts delays are the worst as they bring projects to a stand still...

  • 4 months later...
40 minutes ago, NISR32.5 said:

Any news on these mate?

Yes some progress has been made.  All parts to complete the next two engines are in the hands of the machine shop awaiting final machining.  If things are completed on time I'll have everything ready to assemble the "insane spec" RB33 next Friday. The RB32 that will follow will be a few more weeks after that.

I changed my business name to Project RB recently too, and dropped open deck engines as none of the new engines are open deck anyway.

I completed a 900km day trip about in the car about a month ago and have been driving every day that I can when its not raining. I believe there is about 16,000km on the new setup now.  The long road trip revealed that my alternator can't keep up with the rest of the higher than normal electrical load in the car, so I've got a 150A alternator upgrade going in soon.

That's about all.  Fingers crossed for no more delays.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...