Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

All the real drivers have taken their guards out. :P. It scrubs like a bitch when your low. My tyre actually ate through my drivers side guard. :P

You mean real posers take their guards out..... real drivers dont worry about stance, hellaflush...... :whistling:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/435410-boot-lip/page/2/#findComment-7125167
Share on other sites

You mean real posers take their guards out..... real drivers dont worry about stance, hellaflush...... :whistling:

if the car is low and you have fat wheels, guards need to be taken out. If you have stance, hellaflush, you need your brains taken out :whistling:

  • Like 1
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/435410-boot-lip/page/2/#findComment-7125168
Share on other sites

Haha I had my last car "mitsubishi fto" rubbing a little but full lock would chew the tyres and the guards were takin out, just wAnt to avoid rocks and dirt getting between the panels. And it looks tidy having them in ;)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/435410-boot-lip/page/2/#findComment-7125377
Share on other sites

if the car is low and you have fat wheels, guards need to be taken out. If you have stance, hellaflush, you need your brains taken out :whistling:

Dunno GT-Rs can run 18x10.5+15 with no guards issues, looks mean and it track happy.

Z tune runs 18x9.5 +5...no guard issues

Porsches run a 315 tyre.... STOCK and looks epic... no guard mods required...... :cheers:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/435410-boot-lip/page/2/#findComment-7126476
Share on other sites

Dunno GT-Rs can run 18x10.5+15 with no guards issues, looks mean and it track happy.

Z tune runs 18x9.5 +5...no guard issues

Porsches run a 315 tyre.... STOCK and looks epic... no guard mods required...... :cheers:

I'm talking about the inside plastic guards. Most skylines would have them removed. Not talking about rolling guards or anything. :)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/435410-boot-lip/page/2/#findComment-7126508
Share on other sites

I just prefer my wheels to fill the guards not sticking out or anything, hellaflush and all that shit is a bit stupid but I can appreciate the work.

looks like I'll just have to bite the bullet and pull it out aye :/ I intend on doing it by the book since I payed good money for my car and want it looking neat with a nasty bite ;)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/435410-boot-lip/page/2/#findComment-7126960
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...