Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 105
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I would be surprised if Richards just "let" Button walk. I would think that there was a "pull back" clause in Button's contract that Williams have exercised. As for sacking JV I don't blame him. If you remember JV was being paid $US30m for his last season with BAR thanks to some extortion from his manager/mate Craig Pollock of which he got a healthy percentage one could assume. He was given the alternative of "renegotiating" his contract for 03 to something a little more realistic but refused. He then got sacked!!!Surprise, surprise. After that display I doubt you will see JV in a F1 car again. In any case he ain't that great. He can win in a great car, so what!!! Champions win in cars that aren't so great. The battle between Button and Webber next year should be something!!!!

from the worst kept secret (Webber to williams) to the one of the best kept secrets (Button to willaims). Its the all commonwealth team next year at Williams. Geez those two ITV commentators are going to luv button even more now :)

"Oh, da Matta is gooonnnnne! That's good cause Briscoe is now official test driver as Zonta is promoted to driver for the remainder of 04." - Silver ArrowZ FANTASTIC NEWS I'd just luv to see two Aussie's racing in F1 in 06, might just be a possibily by the looks of things

We've got some real F1 heads here dont we, so whos going to the race next year?

I've got my money saved for tickets, and I got the materials for my sign. Can anyone think of a good supportive message to Mark for it. So far all I got is:

Printed over the BMW emblem:

Bravo

Mark

Webber

How did the media miss this? Id say this would be one of the most suprising driver changes in along time and it will make for a very exciting webber vs button fight next year. I just wonder what the reason behind it is? It will be interesting to hear JBs reasons because if anything BAR are more likley than not going to be a stronger team over the next seasons or two compared to Williams.

Is this a step sideways? if so its a little strange. Also you would think at BAR button is the absolute #1 driver. Also strange to walk away from that.

Like I said before I don't think Button had much choice!!! Previously someone said that BAR has bought his contract from Frank Williiams. I wasn't aware of that, not saying its untrue though. But if that is not the case it would explain his sudden departure to Williams. Frank must think that he is "ready" to go hard at the championship next year. Certainly a much better line up than this year for Williams, at least. Now let's just hope they can make a great car to take it up to the red thing!!!!!!

Well, well, well! Looks like Mr Richards was kept in the dark about this and now he's fuming. He's issues JB and manager an ultimatum. Face to face meeting by Monday afternoon or they're in breach of their contract.

The plot thickens..... What's the clause within the contract that JB and manager think they can get out of BAR???

Well, well, well! Looks like Mr Richards was kept in the dark about this and now he's fuming. He's issues JB and manager an ultimatum. Face to face meeting by Monday afternoon or they're in breach of their contract.

The plot thickens..... What's the clause within the contract that JB and manager think they can get out of BAR???

from what i hear its to do with the Honda contract, Honda have resigned with BAR but they have a get out clause apparently so its not 100% solid.

wish Id seen this thread earlier.

Weber is the man, one of the only guys on the grid who is soley there because of what he can do, no the dollars he brings.

lets not also forget how that CLK merc kept flipping out on him at 300+km's.

give him 5 years and he will be a true contender

5 years? if you are talking about Mark Webber he will probably be retiring in 5 years. Id say give it 6 months. You dont often get 5 years to get up to speed in F1 these days.

wish Id seen this thread earlier.

Weber is the man, one of the only guys on the grid who is soley there because of what he can do, no the dollars he brings.

lets not also forget how that CLK merc kept flipping out on him at 300+km's.

give him 5 years and he will be a true contender

JV was a champion, prolly the only one who took it to M$ and beat him, prior to BAR that was. Also, remember that the BAR Honda of the past few years was shite, and you're onl now starting to see the results of the millions of $$$s worth of R&D.

Button wont go (or be allowed to go) that easily..it's gonna be a huge legal wrangle.

Yes, there are reports Mika is in discussion with BAR, but to be honest, I'd be very suprised if he went from a 3 year sabbatical, STRAIGHT BACK into an F1 car.

A lot has changed in those 3 years, for him, as well as the sport itself.

Webber I believe, will get 3 seasons MAX to deliver a WDC to Williams. Frank Williams and Patrick Head are the biggest hard asses in F1, and they never allow their drivers to fail to deliver, which would explain the 'relative ease' in which they got rid of Ralph and JPM.

I believe they have a decent package for '05 - and with Webber, and more than likely, Button, they can give Williams it's first WDC since JV in 1997.

Button to Williams, while not 100% confirmed, will happen. No such thing as a "bind proof" contract anymore .. money always wins out, and there are always ways n means of getting out of any contract. In my oppinion, Takuma will stay at #1 driver for BAR Honda next season, and I am sure Anthony Davidson will go to #2 driver.

Personally, seeing Button, arguably BAR Honda's best driver, in the short few years they've been in F1, leave the team, the way he has, is heartbreaking.

I would like to either Nick Heidfeld, or Jarno Trulli step up to BAR tho.

  • 3 weeks later...

Yeah, cause Raikkonen had to contend with more rain.

Money is on Schuey though. Hard to beat him in the wet. I wish something happens and a Mac goes in for a win. I want to see Ron Dennis win that bet and the jounalist streak. :P

Was dissapointed in the race, for the simple reason the race wasn't restarted after the first (major) crash...it's usually at the race steward's discretion, but they should have really.

The amount of punctures (thanks to the carbon shrouds) really pissed me off too, more so for the simple fact that the FIA has, for years, been saying they are going to implement procedures (ie coating cf in resin to prevent splintering) for preventing carnage damaging other cars, but they still haven't...When JB went off, I turned off..

Only three more races before Coulthard is goooooooone!!!  Don't think his latest effort trying to overtake Klien will have many team owners drooling.  You might be in with a chance Kel!!

Coulthard was robbed by tyre probs, and that accident was all Kleins fault, where does he get off...at the bust stop or something :gaga:

Wow, that other bloke has now won, what 3 GPs, :flamer:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah, they look good. I should try to fit them on mine. But being a GTSt, the guard shape probably doesn't suit properly.
    • Nah, it's not a simple voltage divider. I'm not enough of an electronics guru to know how they make these circuits work. If I had a better idea of how the ECU's temperature measuring is done, I could then actually do as you want, which is turn that resistance chart into a voltage chart. But my approach has not worked. What I did was interpolate the sensor ohms values for the temperatures you listed, as you did not have any of them on a temperature ending in zero or 5. These are: °C ECU V sensor ohms (interpolated) 58 2.68 11.85 57 2.7 11.89 56 2.74 11.93 54 2.8 12.01 49 3.06 12.208 47 3.18 12.284 43 3.37 12.42 I then assumed 5V supply to the resister and calculated the voltage drop across the sensor for each of those, which is just 5 - the above voltages, and then calculated the current that must be flowing through the sensor. So you get:             Values in sensor °C ECU V sensor ohms (interpolated) Supply volts Volt drop Current 58 2.68 11.85     5 2.32 0.195781 57 2.7 11.89     5 2.3 0.19344 56 2.74 11.93     5 2.26 0.189438 54 2.8 12.01     5 2.2 0.183181 49 3.06 12.208     5 1.94 0.158912 47 3.18 12.284     5 1.82 0.14816 43 3.37 12.42     5 1.63 0.13124 And then use that current and the ECU's sensed voltage (which must be the voltage drop across the in ECU resister is there is one) to calculate the resistance of that in ECU resistor. You get:             Values in sensor   Other resistor °C ECU V sensor ohms (interpolated) Supply volts Volt drop Current   Volt Drop Resistance 58 2.68 11.85     5 2.32 0.195781   2.68 13.68879 57 2.7 11.89     5 2.3 0.19344   2.7 13.95783 56 2.74 11.93     5 2.26 0.189438   2.74 14.46381 54 2.8 12.01     5 2.2 0.183181   2.8 15.28545 49 3.06 12.208     5 1.94 0.158912   3.06 19.25592 47 3.18 12.284     5 1.82 0.14816   3.18 21.46325 43 3.37 12.42     5 1.63 0.13124   3.37 25.67816 And that's where it falls apart, because the resulting resistance would need to be the same for all of those temperatures, and it is not. So clearly the physical model is not correct. Anyway, you or someone else can use that information to go forward if someone has a better physical model. I can also show you how to interpolate for temperatures between those in the resistance chart. It's not fun because you've got to either do it like I did it for every 5°C range separately, or check to see if the slope remains constant over a wide range, then you can just work up a single formula. I'm just showing how to do it for a single 5° span. For the 58°C temperature, resistance = 11.77+2*(11.97-11.77)/5 The calc is a little arse backwards because the resistance is NTC (negative temperature coefficient), so the slope is negative, but I'm lazy, so I just treated 58 as if it was 2 degrees away from 60, not 3 degrees away from 55, and so on.
    • Um.... This is not easy. I will have a fiddle with it, but make no promises. I think, given the explicit resistances vs temperature, and your ECU measured voltages, it should be possible to match them up. I will do that by assuming a 5V supply from ECU to sensor, find out how much current would have to flow to produce that voltage, then use that current as a .... nah f**k. That won't work. The supply voltage is fixed, but there's nothing to say that the ECU regulates the current too. Um... I dunno. I guess there's a voltage divider setup in the ECU. As in, there's another resistance between the ECU's sense terminal and ground. That way, as the sensor resistance changes, that's how they get a floating voltage that varies with the temperature, without having to control the current. Give me a minute or 3.
    • *that* is a question for chatgpt (or someone that understands maths....but I'd try chatty). Drop them the table and ask for the formula
    • Alright. Exhaust has been looked at, and booked in 'soon'. I'm not 100% convinced it's going to be as good as possible but I'm going to go with it anyway. If I get a reasonable thing that works for 10 years I mean that's twice as long as I've lived with the current one. I have a more pressing issue. I have fixed my MPVI3 (by buying a new one). Excellently, one can wire in analog 0-5v inputs to the ECU itself. I had wideband already via Serial so I also wired it in via the direct input. The idea being I can use the standalone logging without a laptop and have Wideband data in it. The other wire I thought I'd use oil temp. This is where I've gone crazy. HPTuners requires you to implement a formula so you know how much volts = how much temp. This seems relatively simple to me. However I cannot find the scale for this anywhere on the internet, nor decipher how to figure it out without removing the sensor from the car. All I know is that voltage actually goes up as temperature goes down. I am using the actual gauge, so I can see what the temp is. The signal wire has been branched off into the MPVI3. EXAMPLE: 2.68v = 58C 2.7 = 57C 2.74v = 56C 2.8V = 54C 3.06V = 49C 3.18V = 47C 3.37V = 43C I think the gauge is 50-150C. It may be more. It may be less, because I can't find it for the love of f**k. It appears all the information about the gauges I have has been scoured from the internet, but the sender is VDO 320.021 I believe the resistance chart is this How the f**k do I convert this to a voltage? Once I have a voltage... I then have to perform this transform of said voltage to show it in the scanner: https://www.hptuners.com/help/VCM-Scanner/Content/vcm_scanner/defining_a_transform.htm @GTSBoy you're probably my only hope here TEST YOUR MIGHT
×
×
  • Create New...