Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I saw 900 degree manifold temps regularly at the track, all with a beanie on. The car has done 6 hard track days and daily driving for many years without issue.

As long as the CHRA is water cooled you should be fine.

Thanks for clearing it up. When I baught my beanie off hpiab they said remove it after hard driving and whilst racing to reduce the risk of damage to bearings. I thought why sell me that if it Can damage the turbo.

Whats the go with HPC? when I had my manifold and housing done I really couldn't tell the difference, I mean even if temps are down

1000c to 800c for example, its still bloody hot, retaining that extra heat might even cause the manifold to crack from the inside

out?? Maybe on a track car it sounds plausible but on a street car things wouldn't get hot enough??

Aparently beanies can lead to internal bearing damage if left on and raced with. No idea how. Hpc coating increases thermal efficiency in the turbo which leads to better response. Plus if you hpc coat it silver the chicks will flock... hard. But in all seriousness when I do go a steampipe manifold ill be hpc coating the manifold and turbo housing. Looks good, doesn't get that rusted look from heat, serves a purpose.

This. Just do it and rest assured it's an asset to your build. I've always HPC coated my exhaust components (if the wallet permitted I'd do the entire system ;) ) but my turbo manifold, ex housing and dump pipe/wastegate plumb is all coated. Granted, it is still hot (but greatly reduced) and you can feel that under the engine bay... but consider this... what would it be like without it? Whilst off, definitely beneficial if you can afford it.

Edited by Reflector

But he already has a beanie, so it's a total waste of cash. I would only ever recommend it for mild steel exhausts to prolong their (short) life.

DEI Beanie and DEI Ti wrap the dump (for stainless) is the best shield against heat I have found so far, and I have used most other styles of heat barriers.

Im not saying it for heat shielding. im saying to hpc coat it to retain the heat inside the turbo exhaust to improve thermal efficiency. Yes it helps shield heat but im aiming at the heat retention in the turbo. i was running a turbo beanie untill a poorly made oil line burst and filled it full of oil. now it wont stop smoking. its like i have bob marley under my bonnet.

Hmm iv hit a wall! I bought what I was told was a gt3076 .82 rear but it does not seem to fit the wheel?!?

Here are some pics. What have a bought and maybe my turbo isn't what it should be?!?

Hmm iv hit a wall! I bought what I was told was a gt3076 .82 rear but it does not seem to fit the wheel?!?

Here are some pics. What have a bought and maybe my turbo isn't what it should be?!?

post-22485-0-62881100-1392943926_thumb.jpg

post-22485-0-85208100-1392943967_thumb.jpg

post-22485-0-20695100-1392944083_thumb.jpg

Do yourself a favour and ignore what the tag on the core says for a moment... Measure the turbine at its largest diameter and see if its 60mm or 56.5mm.

ARTZ had a turbo from a reputable resaler which was labelled a 3071, but when we measured up it had a 56.5mm turbine and a 76mm T04S compressor. It was more likely they had rebuilt it and simply neglected to update the tag. Or built a custom turbo from whatever they had around... Who knows.

Its possible that its for a 35R, as the housings are identical on the outside. You should still measure your turbine though.

Once you measure the turbine you will know if you A: have the wrong turbo for that housing, or B: have the wrong housing for that turbo.

You must measure first.

Edited by GTScotT

True: the photo's clearly show its wrong. SO, the task is now to work out what housing he actually needs and who's responsibility the wrong housing is.

In A: the seller did nothing wrong and OP needs to wear it or ask nicely to return, in B: seller needs to give OP a refund as he misrepresented the product.

Edited by GTScotT

Highly likely a EWG housing for a GT3582R , probably the easiest thing is to measure the ID of the housing and if it comes out a little over 61mm that sort of gives the game away . A GT30 turbine from memory measures ~ 54.9mm at the exducer (outlet diameter) so a matching housing would be that plus clearance .

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...