Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi all

I am happy with the state of my tune and power delivery (263kwatw). Knock sits between 15-30 on an average day (say between 20-28 degree temp day)

The highest i've seen knock was at about 42-43, but that was on a 36+ deg day and me giving it some (prob not the best idea i know)

Using map tracer, when on full load (about 1.1 bar), I generally use L14 and L15 on the map.

Exh temp sits around 600-700 degrees when on light load areas higher in the map where timing is around 35-40 deg.

What do you guys think of the timing map?

post-74132-0-52662400-1394316636_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/440251-pick-apart-my-ign-map-rb26-tune/
Share on other sites

Making assumption that full load fuelling is right - you'd want to be in the 11.5 - 12.0:1 AFR on petrol.

L15, L16 rows might be worth revisiting, try -2 adjustment and see how things respond from knock perspective.

I wouldn't have absolute faith in the sensor outputs, you would really do well to run it on a dyno and use chassis ears (aka knock box) to physically listen for any signs of knock.

Have a good look in the L5-L8 rows, in rpm range 2500-4500. You might add 2-3 degrees there and see if it makes the thing any perkier on cruise.

Hmmm, will take that on board. I have used the temp ign adjust to dial back the entire map by -1 and doesn't affect knock reading whatsoever. have also tried adjusting +1 all round and same deal, knock reading is pretty much the same all round.

Def felt perkier in low rpm though when I went up +1 on the temp ign.

I don't have a datalogit and couldn't be bothered with mapping out the entire inj map, but will put it on the dyno to look at AFR's.

put a knock block on....i could hear knock through the headphones that was not registering on the PowerFC assuming this is what you have. what mods?

Mods are very mild.

200 CPI catco metal cat, Apexi N 1 3.5inch cat back. boost restrictor removed. Power FC

I'm tuning my wifes GTR after i scored a Powerfc off a friend. The stock maps use relatively advanced timing. i think its more cruicial getting your fuel dialed in properly before ignition...but 1 or 2 degrees here and there ain't too bad....until you can get fueling map done it looks alright, you've taken timing out in areas of deceleration/light load what were your thoughts on doing this? you can usually put more timing there.

I'm tuning my wifes GTR after i scored a Powerfc off a friend. The stock maps use relatively advanced timing. i think its more cruicial getting your fuel dialed in properly before ignition...but 1 or 2 degrees here and there ain't too bad....until you can get fueling map done it looks alright, you've taken timing out in areas of deceleration/light load what were your thoughts on doing this? you can usually put more timing there.

The majority of higher knock (25-30) happens on light/mid load areas of the map. I'm taking a guess and saying the fuel load for these areas is prob on the leaner side to try maintain fuel economy while cruising.

a shame you're in sydney...could've just come over and gone for a drive with the datalogit. i'd recommend getting one if you want to start learning to tune. i think they are cheap enough these days....i bought an old one of a mate. I pulled a little bit of timing out. if you graph the values you can often see the troughs and peaks that need smoothing out. if you pm me your ign map i'll wack it into datalogit and produce the graph and see how it looks. These motors are usually quite linear....but again fueling has to match.

Edited by Badgaz

Using Pulp98 - Cas was set at 20 deg manually, then tuned. i have not physically checked this though.

EGT on full noise will be in the vicinity of 500-600 degrees. I need a second set of eyes though as I cannot be certain. the most I have seen exh temp was around 760, but that was highway driving at 110k's in 4th/5th.

Stock rb26 ecu run around 24* at 0.9bar, so youre a little advanced ign wise around peak torque area. You should get a wideband on it and look at the afrs just to make sure.

Ive heard audible knk from a rb26 and the controller only read 30's so be careful with it especially in the off to on boost areas at cruising speed in the higher gears

timing should not be tapering down with increase in rpm..should do opposite.. more advance with rpm.

you may need to pipe the timing down bit to start then ramp it in.

I did wonder why this is? is that because the duration between each compression stroke is effectively shorter?

I did wonder why this is? is that because the duration between each compression stroke is effectively shorter?

torque drops off, less cylinder pressure so you effectively can dial in more timing

hence at peak torque you take off timing, as cylinder pressures are highest.. looking at that map, it's terrible.. there's more timing at peak torque than after peak torque.....

feel free to PM me to chat, I don't like talking about this stuff on the public forum as people like to have stabs at me.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, after the full circus this week (new gearbag, 14 psi actuator on, injectors and AFM upgraded, and.....turbo repair) the diagnosis on the wastegate is in. It was broken. It was broken in a really strange way. The weld that holds the lever arm onto the wastegate flapper shaft broke. Broke completely, but broke in such a way that it could go back together in the "correct" position, or it could rearrange itself somewhere else along the fracture plane and sit with the flapper not parallel to the lever. So, who knows how and when exactly what happened? No-one will ever know. Was it broken like this the first time it spat the circlip and wedged itself deep into the dump? Or was it only broken when I tried to pry it back into place? (I didn't try that hard, but who knows?). Or did it break first? Or did it break between the first and second event of wierdness? Meh. It doesn't matter now. It is welded back together. And it is now held closed by a 14 psi actuator, so...the car has been tuned with the supporting mods (and the order of operations there is that the supporting mods and dyno needed to be able to be done first before adding boost, because it was pinging on <<14 psi with the new turbo with only a 6 psi actuator). And then tuned up a bit, and with the boost controller turned off throughout that process. So it was only running WG pressure and so only hit about 15-16 psi. The turbo is still ever so slightly lazier than might be preferred - like it is still a bit on the big side for the engine. I haven't tested it on the road properly in any way - just driven it around in traffic for a half hour or so. But it is like chalk and cheese compared to what it was. Between dyno numbers and driving feedback: It makes 100 kW at 3k rpm, which is OK, could be better. That's stock 2JZ territory, or RB20 with G series 550. It actually starts building boost from 2k, which is certainly better than it did recently (with all the WG flapper bullshit). Although it's hard to remember what it was like prior to all that - it certainly seems much, much better. And that makes sense, given the WG was probably starting to blow open at anything above about 3 psi anyway (with the 6 psi actuator). It doesn't really get to "full boost" (say 16 psi) until >>4k rpm. I am hopeful that this is a feature of the lack of boost controller keeping boost pressure off the actuator, because it was turned off for the dyno and off for the drives afterward. There's more to be found here, I'm sure. It made 230 rwkW at not a lot more than 6k and held it to over 7k, so there seems to be plenty of potential to get it up to 250-260rwkW with 18 psi or so, which would be a decent effort, considering the stock sized turbo inlet pipework and AFM, and the return flow cooler. According to Tao, those things should definitely put a bit of a limit on it by that sort of number. I must stress that I have not opened the throttle 100% on the road yet - well, at least not 100% and allowed it to wind all the way up. It'll have to wait until some reasonable opportunity. I'm quite looking forward to that - it feels massively better than it has in a loooong time. It's back to its old self, plus about 20% extra powers over the best it ever did before. I'm going to get the boost controller set up to maximise spool and settle at no more than ~17 psi (for now) and then go back on the dyno to see what we can squeeze out of it. There is other interesting news too. I put together a replacement tube to fit the R35 AFM in the stock location. This is the first time the tuner has worked with one, because anyone else he has tuned for has gone from Z32 territory to aftermarket ECU. No-one has ever wanted to stay Nistuned and do what I've done. Anyway, his feedback is that the R35 AFM is super super super responsive. Tiny little changes in throttle position or load turn up immediately as a cell change on the maps. Way, way more responsive than any of the old skool AFMs. Makes it quite diffifult to tune as you have to stay right on top of that so you don't wander off the cell you wanted to tune. But it certainly seems to help with real world throttle response. That's hard to separate from all the other things that changed, but the "pedal feel" is certainly crisp.
    • I'm a bit confused by this post, so I'll address the bit I understand lol.  Use an air compressor and blow away the guide coat sanding residue. All the better if you have a moisture trap for your compressor. You'd want to do this a few times as you sand the area, you wouldn't for example sand the entire area till you think its perfect and then 'confirm' that is it by blowing away the guide coat residue.  Sand the area, blow away the guide coat residue, inspect the panel, back to sanding... rinse and repeat. 
    • The detail level is about right for the money they charge for the full kit... AU$21.00 each issue, 110 issues for a total of $2,300 (I mentioned $2.2K in the first post when the exchange rate was better). $20/week is doable... 😐
    • If planning on joining us for the day(s) please indicate by filling in this form. https://forms.gle/Ma8Nn4DzYVA8uDHg7
    • You put the driver's seat on the wrong side! Incredible detail on all of this. It looks like you could learn a lot about the car just from assembling the kit.
×
×
  • Create New...