Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey there. I know this has probably been discussed many times before but I would like a bit of feed back please :).

I have a 32 GTR that i use for time attack and sprint days. Recently I just got a wheel alignment and corner balance done and the car now has some extreme over steer happening. So much so that I can barely put any power down in a corner. This brings up my question. What is the ideal track setup for a 32 gtr with street tyres (Federal RSR).??

My set up is: HKS Hipermax IV coilovers.

Adjustable front camber arms

Adjustable front castor arms

Adjustable rear camber arms

Hicas lock bar.

Run about negative 4.2 degrees of camber and 6-7 degrees of castor up front

Rear is about negative 2degrees camber and neautral toe setup.

Thanks in advance. Emilio

What's your budget ?

How good do you want it to handle ?

4.2deg is to much on any tyre, about 3-3.2 is good

Is your rear sway bar adjustable ?

Soften the rear shocks and sway bar a bit and see what happens

Personally I like the race spec Teins or Bilstien

  • Like 1

If the alignment caused problems, get that undone. Around -3 camber is what you'd use for R-specs, so is too much for S-specs like RSRs. I'd start with -2 and see how that goes. Measure the temperature across the tread inside to outside to see if its even. 6-7 castor is supposed to feel great but you'll destroy your upper control arm bushes pretty quickly... -2 camber on the rear is probably too much as well. If you can, post full alignment specs before and after.

R32 attessa sucks balls in stock form - too much power oversteer. Get an attessa tweaker if you dont have one already.

If the alignment caused problems, get that undone. Around -3 camber is what you'd use for R-specs, so is too much for S-specs like RSRs. I'd start with -2 and see how that goes. Measure the temperature across the tread inside to outside to see if its even. 6-7 castor is supposed to feel great but you'll destroy your upper control arm bushes pretty quickly... -2 camber on the rear is probably too much as well. If you can, post full alignment specs before and after.

R32 attessa sucks balls in stock form - too much power oversteer. Get an attessa tweaker if you dont have one already.

Ahh yes that's right RSRs are an S compound, 2/2.5 on front

Rear depends on suspension bushes use, you need more for rubber then you do for rose joints

As for the Attessa, get the tweaker as Mr Stabby says and do the transfer case mod using the 33 preload setting

The rear diff has recently been done and the front was pulled apart and checked etc when the motor was built. About 6 months ago. Basically I use to run about -2.5 camber in the front and -1.5 in the rear. But I was having some under steer issues. So I took it to my alignment guy and he put in all this negative

Camber up front so it could turn in better.

The car turns in great now but it's like the rear just can't keep up. It just slides around like nothing

also I would go less camber at the rear too, I only run 1.5 and that is on semis not street tyres. A little toe in at the rear (1mm) is will also reduce oversteer

When you say extreme oversteer, when does it happen? turning into a corner, mid corner or on throttle application on the way out. How much power do you have, and do you have any diff or transfer case/attessa controller mods?

Well I was running about 430awhp before the alignment and had no issues with putting power down. But ever since I now backed it off to 300awhp and it still does it.

I Know it may be hard to believe but it happens on turn in if I turn in sharply the rear comes around sliding and if I even apply the throttle a little bit more than coasting midway through corners it kicks out and on exit it basically feels like a drift car... I hate how it feels.

Can you recommend any good places that knows how to set up a 32gtr well Duncan? Thanks a lot

Also before this setup. I had old single height adjustable ohlins coilovers that had f**ked dampeners. Less front camber. Around (-2.5) and I was doing consistent high 58 around qr sprint track and mid 60. Around lakeside. Yesterday I raced at lakeside and ended the day with a 65.5. So I'm litterally 5 seconds slower. :(

R32s understeer a lot, and power oversteer a lot. AFAIK the understeer is due to the weight imbalance, so can be bandaided over but not stopped. Power oversteer is due to the attessa setup which can be cured with an attessa tweaker (and I guess the transfer case mod mentioned by Mick. I havent had it done, but many swear by it).

I have ~400awhp and no problems powering out of the corner. -3 camber on the front -1.25 at the rear, zero toe both ends, castor will be around 4 40 now (stock is 3 40 so what i would have been running last track day, and i believe the nismo kit gives an extra degree), R spec tyres (r888s). IIRC i was running -2 at the front with RSRs, and wasnt that much slower, but r888s suck.

My latest mods on my car to get rid of understeer are: Nismo suspension arm kit, softer front springs, more front ride height (old springs were too short to get to 350mm). Cant wait to try it out.

When they dynoed it did they disconnect the 4WD and if so did they reconnect it, also if the LSD is two way and to tight it can unsettle the rear end on braking turn in which if like me you like to trail brake into corners is fine, if not learn to do it or get a 1.5 way

Bring the front back to 2.5-3deg, closer to 2.5deg given the castor you've got

Rear to 1.5deg and 1mm toe out which will zero out under acceleration but settle the car under braking

Look into some adjustable Whiteline sway bars 24mm front 22mm rear

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...