Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey there. I know this has probably been discussed many times before but I would like a bit of feed back please :).

I have a 32 GTR that i use for time attack and sprint days. Recently I just got a wheel alignment and corner balance done and the car now has some extreme over steer happening. So much so that I can barely put any power down in a corner. This brings up my question. What is the ideal track setup for a 32 gtr with street tyres (Federal RSR).??

My set up is: HKS Hipermax IV coilovers.

Adjustable front camber arms

Adjustable front castor arms

Adjustable rear camber arms

Hicas lock bar.

Run about negative 4.2 degrees of camber and 6-7 degrees of castor up front

Rear is about negative 2degrees camber and neautral toe setup.

Thanks in advance. Emilio

What's your budget ?

How good do you want it to handle ?

4.2deg is to much on any tyre, about 3-3.2 is good

Is your rear sway bar adjustable ?

Soften the rear shocks and sway bar a bit and see what happens

Personally I like the race spec Teins or Bilstien

  • Like 1

If the alignment caused problems, get that undone. Around -3 camber is what you'd use for R-specs, so is too much for S-specs like RSRs. I'd start with -2 and see how that goes. Measure the temperature across the tread inside to outside to see if its even. 6-7 castor is supposed to feel great but you'll destroy your upper control arm bushes pretty quickly... -2 camber on the rear is probably too much as well. If you can, post full alignment specs before and after.

R32 attessa sucks balls in stock form - too much power oversteer. Get an attessa tweaker if you dont have one already.

If the alignment caused problems, get that undone. Around -3 camber is what you'd use for R-specs, so is too much for S-specs like RSRs. I'd start with -2 and see how that goes. Measure the temperature across the tread inside to outside to see if its even. 6-7 castor is supposed to feel great but you'll destroy your upper control arm bushes pretty quickly... -2 camber on the rear is probably too much as well. If you can, post full alignment specs before and after.

R32 attessa sucks balls in stock form - too much power oversteer. Get an attessa tweaker if you dont have one already.

Ahh yes that's right RSRs are an S compound, 2/2.5 on front

Rear depends on suspension bushes use, you need more for rubber then you do for rose joints

As for the Attessa, get the tweaker as Mr Stabby says and do the transfer case mod using the 33 preload setting

The rear diff has recently been done and the front was pulled apart and checked etc when the motor was built. About 6 months ago. Basically I use to run about -2.5 camber in the front and -1.5 in the rear. But I was having some under steer issues. So I took it to my alignment guy and he put in all this negative

Camber up front so it could turn in better.

The car turns in great now but it's like the rear just can't keep up. It just slides around like nothing

also I would go less camber at the rear too, I only run 1.5 and that is on semis not street tyres. A little toe in at the rear (1mm) is will also reduce oversteer

When you say extreme oversteer, when does it happen? turning into a corner, mid corner or on throttle application on the way out. How much power do you have, and do you have any diff or transfer case/attessa controller mods?

Well I was running about 430awhp before the alignment and had no issues with putting power down. But ever since I now backed it off to 300awhp and it still does it.

I Know it may be hard to believe but it happens on turn in if I turn in sharply the rear comes around sliding and if I even apply the throttle a little bit more than coasting midway through corners it kicks out and on exit it basically feels like a drift car... I hate how it feels.

Can you recommend any good places that knows how to set up a 32gtr well Duncan? Thanks a lot

Also before this setup. I had old single height adjustable ohlins coilovers that had f**ked dampeners. Less front camber. Around (-2.5) and I was doing consistent high 58 around qr sprint track and mid 60. Around lakeside. Yesterday I raced at lakeside and ended the day with a 65.5. So I'm litterally 5 seconds slower. :(

R32s understeer a lot, and power oversteer a lot. AFAIK the understeer is due to the weight imbalance, so can be bandaided over but not stopped. Power oversteer is due to the attessa setup which can be cured with an attessa tweaker (and I guess the transfer case mod mentioned by Mick. I havent had it done, but many swear by it).

I have ~400awhp and no problems powering out of the corner. -3 camber on the front -1.25 at the rear, zero toe both ends, castor will be around 4 40 now (stock is 3 40 so what i would have been running last track day, and i believe the nismo kit gives an extra degree), R spec tyres (r888s). IIRC i was running -2 at the front with RSRs, and wasnt that much slower, but r888s suck.

My latest mods on my car to get rid of understeer are: Nismo suspension arm kit, softer front springs, more front ride height (old springs were too short to get to 350mm). Cant wait to try it out.

When they dynoed it did they disconnect the 4WD and if so did they reconnect it, also if the LSD is two way and to tight it can unsettle the rear end on braking turn in which if like me you like to trail brake into corners is fine, if not learn to do it or get a 1.5 way

Bring the front back to 2.5-3deg, closer to 2.5deg given the castor you've got

Rear to 1.5deg and 1mm toe out which will zero out under acceleration but settle the car under braking

Look into some adjustable Whiteline sway bars 24mm front 22mm rear

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
    • So I found this: https://www.efihardware.com/temperature-sensor-voltage-calculator I didn't know what the pullup resistor is. So I thought if I used my table of known values I could estimate it by putting a value into the pullup resistor, and this should line up with the voltages I had measured. Eventually I got this table out of it by using 210ohms as the pullup resistor. 180C 0.232V - Predicted 175C 0.254V - Predicted 170C 0.278V - Predicted 165C 0.305V - Predicted 160C 0.336V - Predicted 155C 0.369V - Predicted 150C 0.407V - Predicted 145C 0.448V - Predicted 140C 0.494V - Predicted 135C 0.545V - Predicted 130C 0.603V - Predicted 125C 0.668V - Predicted 120C 0.740V - Predicted 115C 0.817V - Predicted 110C 0.914V - Predicted 105C 1.023V - Predicted 100C 1.15V 90C 1.42V - Predicted 85C 1.59V 80C 1.74V 75C 1.94V 70C 2.10V 65C 2.33V 60C 2.56V 58C 2.68V 57C 2.70V 56C 2.74V 55C 2.78V 54C 2.80V 50C 2.98V 49C 3.06V 47C 3.18V 45C 3.23V 43C 3.36V 40C 3.51V 37C 3.67V 35C 3.75V 30C 4.00V As before, the formula in HPTuners is here: https://www.hptuners.com/documentation/files/VCM-Scanner/Content/vcm_scanner/defining_a_transform.htm?Highlight=defining a transform Specifically: In my case I used 50C and 150C, given the sensor is supposedly for that. Input 1 = 2.98V Output 1 = 50C Input 2 = 0.407V Output 2 = 150C (0.407-2.98) / (150-50) -2.573/100 = -0.02573 2.98/-0.02573 + 47.045 = 50 So the corresponding formula should be: (Input / -0.02573) + 47.045 = Output.   If someone can confirm my math it'd be great. Supposedly you can pick any two pairs of the data to make this formula.
×
×
  • Create New...