Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Not sure if its been covered...

What is your exhaust like?

Um dumps are shiney Tomei items (Well they were shiney once). Rest of system is 3.5 inch. Cant remember what was downstream of the dump pipes but they were round & stainless.

Point is car will run to 22lb just not on the boost controller.

post-5134-0-00171200-1397525833_thumb.jpg

Just for other random people reading this: See the image above. The spring (preloaded by the variable length actuator rod) is there to hold the wastegate shut. By shortening the actuator rod you increase the load on the spring and therefore the wastegate stays shut for longer/under more pressure, all else being equal.

Air under pressure to the diaphragm on the actuator works to open the wastegate. If you are running a bleed valve reducing the air to the actuator will give you more boost as there isn’t as much air flow/pressure to oppose the spring and open the wastegate. If you are running an electronic boost controller surely the last thing you want to do is reduce the amount of air supplied to the controller – simply because controlling airflow is the controllers job. The Blitz is a dual solenoid type which should easilly allow a sufficient range of airflow to work over a 22lb setup. Maybe it isnt the case for a single solenoid type and people put a restictor down stream of it but to my addled brain that is a dodgy way of fixing the problem and would surely reduce the boost controllers responsiveness?

What I am guessing is happening in this case is that there isn’t enough air going through the solenoids to oppose a larger spring force - either because it has shit the biscuit or blocked with something. Hence insufficient preload can be applied to the actuators/spring to hold it shut at 22lb or insufficient air flow provided to open them up. (Choose your preferred failure mode). Hence I can only get a rather indifferent 16lb.

Anyway fingers crossed a new solenoid will fix the problem.

The boost going into the actuator works against the spring to open the wastegate puck. It doesn't hold it shut unless you have a dual port actuator, similar to an external gate, which is very rare in internal applications.

You either need boost pushing from the other side of the diaphragm, or a stronger spring. Putting a restrictor inline acts like a capacitor, smoothing the boost out, it won't help you, nor will winding so much preload into it that the puck can't travel anymore. Preload doesn't make the spring stronger, it just limits the wastegate travel.

It just slows the wastegate down, restricting the speed it can open or close. Not ideal.

Nissan only use restrictors to adjust the amount of air the stock solenoid bleeds off, it adjusts the boost level using the restrictor hole size.

Yes. Important point to remember.....air does not "flow" in a wastegate control line. At least not at the wastegate actuator end of it. It is a simple pressure system. Apply pressure at one end of a (closed) pipe and it turns up at the other end.

The only flow involved is once you start bleeding. By allowing some air to flow through a restrictor you get a pressure drop caused by the flow itself (basically internal gas and wall friction). Not rocket science. Well, maybe primary school rocket science.

  • 3 weeks later...

post-5134-0-50430900-1399011400_thumb.jpg

post-5134-0-29606400-1399011483_thumb.jpg

See photo for gory details of inside of new boost control solenoid. Pretty basic stuff. Solenoid measures 38 ohms resistance. Guessing the little vents (on the left hand side with the green paint on the end and then behind that) allow the controller to dump the air out of the waste gate lines when necessary.

Oddly (or not?) you can push air through it with no voltage on. Flows from inlet to outlet. Not sure why this is possible.

  • 2 weeks later...

I spent a lot of time trying to solve a similar problem. Was sure everything was right, then when i ran out of parts to blame in process of elimination, i pulled the vac line off the stock bov connection to find it was not under vacuum at all.

The re-circulation of air was causing restriction in amount of boost i could run. Workshop missed it during tune also.

Worth a check!

  • 1 year later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • You are selling this? I have never bought something from marketplace...i dont know if i trust that enough. And the price is little bit "too" good...
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/19kSVAc4tc/?mibextid=wwXIfr
    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
    • There is a guy who said he can weld me piping without having to cut chassis, maybe I do that ? Or do I just go reverse flow but isn’t reverse flow very limited once again? 
×
×
  • Create New...