Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Even the OP has stated that it is exhibiting both. I'm no suspension engineer, but you can see and hear that the car has corner entry and some mid corner understeer. And it seems like most of the oversteer is at corner exit. I think a more neutral setup will help alleviate both. But I agree with Neil, by making small changes, I think a lot could be gained. Such as some wheel alignment tweeks i.e. Some more positive caster up front or adjusting the ride height.

I am going to peg rear camber back to about 1 degree if this fixes the rear end grip then maybe i can adjust sway bars to reduce understeer (softer in the front or harder in the back although the links on the whiteline kit seem to only fit in some positions)

I use the standard factory sway bar links and have had the same problem trying to get them to fit the rear holes on the sway bars. Now I know the front ones are side specific and looking at them I think if you use right for left and visa-versa you can access the other holes. Not sure on the rears but give me a couple of days and I'll confirm it.

Cheers

Neil.

Yeah there is definitely some corner entry understeer and mid corner to exit oversteer. To me personally it feels like the oversteer is more the limiting factor because i cant step on the gas more to increase corner speed and exit speed.

However the entry understeer will be next on my list if i can dial out the oversteer by improving contact patch in the rear then i will work on sway bars and maybe some toe out in the front as suggested.

Have also been doing some reading on this site, very informative.http://turnfast.com/tech_handling/handling_tuningtable

I use the standard factory sway bar links and have had the same problem trying to get them to fit the rear holes on the sway bars. Now I know the front ones are side specific and looking at them I think if you use right for left and visa-versa you can access the other holes. Not sure on the rears but give me a couple of days and I'll confirm it.

Cheers

Neil.

Interesting please do let me know. I believe there was also a beefed up end links kit i did wonder if you had to get that to get all the adjustment.

Yea but your only running a 2 hole adjustable sway bar,,,I'm of the belief we are talking about the 4 hole puppies which for the links is a different situation all together. Your link is way badly bent and in my opinion would never fit our back 2 holes.

Here's 2 pics of mine and the same sided links will not adjust to the 2 rear holes. We might have to make rose jointed links to make it all fit properly,,,but I will on the weekend work some of it out and post my conclusions.

post-29-0-66844300-1403781386_thumb.jpg

post-29-0-17969800-1403781411_thumb.jpg

Cheers

Neil.

Set your centre of wheel to guard height at 340-350 mm. Make sure your bump stops are half the height of std.

Your wheel alignment is way to neutral. Toe out the front to 3mm or so (you may want more) and toe the rear in 1 mm as this will even out on acceleration. You might also find that with these settings and the correct tyre pressure you could stiffen your front bar.

Your set up is very similar to mine, and should be a lot more stable on the turn in and exit.

As Neil said make small changes write them down and keep a log of your opinions of the changes and cars feedback so you have history.

Enjoy.

Even the OP has stated that it is exhibiting both. I'm no suspension engineer, but you can see and hear that the car has corner entry and some mid corner understeer. And it seems like most of the oversteer is at corner exit. I think a more neutral setup will help alleviate both. But I agree with Neil, by making small changes, I think a lot could be gained. Such as some wheel alignment tweeks i.e. Some more positive caster up front or adjusting the ride height.

sounds like its just too high and being a boat :rofl:

Bump steer front and rear. I agree with an earlier comment about this.

Those pretty LCA and tie rod ends don't show true perspective but if they're running on different planes then it's going to do silly things as the suspension goes through its travel range.

Same thing goes for the rear.

Yea but your only running a 2 hole adjustable sway bar,,,I'm of the belief we are talking about the 4 hole puppies which for the links is a different situation all together. Your link is way badly bent and in my opinion would never fit our back 2 holes.

Here's 2 pics of mine and the same sided links will not adjust to the 2 rear holes. We might have to make rose jointed links to make it all fit properly,,,but I will on the weekend work some of it out and post my conclusions.

attachicon.gifpic164_01.jpg

attachicon.gifpic165_01.jpg

Cheers

Neil.

Mine is set to second softest of the 4 on the front i can move it one more adjustment forward. I cant access the front most or rear most.

Set your centre of wheel to guard height at 340-350 mm. Make sure your bump stops are half the height of std.

Your wheel alignment is way to neutral. Toe out the front to 3mm or so (you may want more) and toe the rear in 1 mm as this will even out on acceleration. You might also find that with these settings and the correct tyre pressure you could stiffen your front bar.

Your set up is very similar to mine, and should be a lot more stable on the turn in and exit.

As Neil said make small changes write them down and keep a log of your opinions of the changes and cars feedback so you have history.

Enjoy.

Cheers for that i will measure it up tonight so you can all have a laugh!

Should i cut down the standard bump stops?

Bump steer front and rear. I agree with an earlier comment about this.

Those pretty LCA and tie rod ends don't show true perspective but if they're running on different planes then it's going to do silly things as the suspension goes through its travel range.

Same thing goes for the rear.

Hopefully lowering will fix this when i originally set the ride height i did notice the arms were on a slight upwards angle from the wheel to chasis. I assume that level is optimal.

Unfortunately the car came with a fiberglass bumper. Nice and light but it protrudes quite far out the front and actually slants forward so the lowest point is right at the front edge not towards the wheels as with the standard bumper.

The further away (lower) from standard ride height, the more pronounced rear bump steer becomes.

It is countered by installing and adjusting rear adjustable links - the forward/upper ones sometimes referred to as "traction arms".

I never had a bump steer issue and front of my car was lower than most...I had bump stop issues, but not bump steer...

My car had Stock swaybars, all stock suspension arms, bilstein suspension...camber 3 and 1.5 just from lowering, toe set pretty much neutral, I think 1 degree of caster..17 x8,9 and 245/40, 255/40 tyres...It always handled great and exceeded my expectations..I know some people are doing quick laptimes with much the same setup too but better brakes and bigger balls...

my next step was sways bars and some extra caster, but I didnt see the need to do much more to it, it was simple and it worked...Not to stiff, not too soft..

The new owner said he has some issues with the front being too low, because he lives in the bush and has crappy roads though..guess it depends where you drive most and how good the roads you drive on are...But on the track and around Melbourne I never had an issue and my crossmemebr was maybe 120mm off the ground...I know it was just above legal height anyway..

OP was complaining about oversteer hence the comments about rear end adjustments and ride height.

Depending on what is fitted/changed (or not) it is possible to achieve bump steer ie. dynamic toe change as the suspension goes up/down at either end. Altered ride height does affect things.

Open to conjecture but I'd be looking into it if I was the OP. Harry was onto it early in this thread. Investigating and/or fixing it may mean having someone do it for him if he's not sure how.

With those spring rates I would be dropping the rear sway bar off totally. If it does roll a little then stiffen up the front bar, though I doubt it will.

Run about -1.0 rear camber with about 3-4mm toe in overall.

There is also an inherent flaw in the rear end design of the r33's when the tire travels from a drooped state to loaded state, the toe essentially becomes dynamic rather then staying at what you set it too statically when doing a wheel alignment.

  • Like 2

With those spring rates I would be dropping the rear sway bar off totally. If it does roll a little then stiffen up the front bar, though I doubt it will.

Run about -1.0 rear camber with about 3-4mm toe in overall.

There is also an inherent flaw in the rear end design of the r33's when the tire travels from a drooped state to loaded state, the toe essentially becomes dynamic rather then staying at what you set it too statically when doing a wheel alignment.

Interesting regarding dropping the rear sway bar, I will see how i go this weekend maybe drop of if the rear camber hasn't made a big difference.

Car is set to 340mm front and rear. Alignment set as follows:

Camber front -3.1 deg

Toe front -2.8 total

Camber rear -1 deg

Toe rear 2.5mm total

Running a test day this Sunday at Pukekohe, will post up the results next week.

What are your thoughts on removing vs adding weight into the rear. Is this going to increase or decrease oversteer. Ie if i leave my spare tyre in.

With those alignment settings you usually want 2-4mm toe out on the front, are you saying have 2.8mm of toe out or toe in?

Honestly at this level, dont worry about weight balance yet. If it was me I would be just pulling all the weight I can out to reduce overall weight. R33's are not the best circuit car, they are heavy and cumbersome....but they are fun!

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • As discussed in the previous post, the bushes in the 110 needed replacing. I took this opportunity to replace the castor bushes, the front lower control arm, lower the car and get the alignment dialled in with new tyres. I took it down to Alignment Motorsports on the GC to get this work done and also get more out of the Shockworks as I felt like I wasn't getting the full use out of them.  To cut a very long story short, it ended up being the case the passenger side castor arm wouldn't accept the brand new bush as the sleeve had worn badly enough to the point you could push the new bush in by hand and completely through. Trying a pair of TRD bushes didn't fix the issue either (I had originally gone with Hardrace bushes). We needed to urgently source another castor arm, and thankfully this was sourced and the guys at the shop worked on my car until 7pm on a Saturday to get everything done. The car rides a lot nicer now with the suspension dialled in properly. Lowered the car a little as well to suit the lower profile front tyres, and just bring the car down generally. Eternally thankful for the guys down at the shop to get the car sorted, we both pulled big favours from our contacts to get it done on the Saturday.  Also plugged in the new Stedi foglights into the S15, and even from a quick test in the garage I'm keen to see how they look out on the road. I had some concerns about the length of the LED body and whether it'd fit in the foglight housing but it's fine.  I've got a small window coming up next month where I'll likely get a little paint work done on the 110 to remove the rear wing, add a boot wing and roof wing, get the side skirt fixed up and colour match the little panel on the tail lights so that I can install some badges that I've kept in storage. I'm also tempted to put in a new pair of headlights on the 110.  Until then, here's some more pictures from Easter this year. 
    • I would put a fuel pressure gauge between the filter and the fuel rail, see if it's maintaining good fuel pressure at idle going up to the point when it stalls. Do you see any strange behavior in commanded fuel leading up to the point when it stalls? You might have to start going through the service manual and doing a long list of sensor tests if it's not the fuel system for whatever reason.
    • Hi,  Just joined the forum so I could share my "fix" of this problem. Might be of use to someone. Had the same hunting at idle issue on my V36 with VQ35HR engine after swapping the engine because the original one got overheated.  While changing the engine I made the mistake of cleaning the throttle bodies and tried all the tricks i could find to do a throttle relearn with no luck. Gave in and took it to a shop and they couldn't sort it. Then took it to my local Nissan dealership and they couldn't get it to idle properly. They said I'd need to replace the throttle bodies and the ecu probably costing more than the car is worth. So I had the idea of replacing the carbon I cleaned out with a thin layer of super glue and it's back to normal idle now. Bit rough but saved the car from the wreckers 🤣
    • After my last update, I went ahead with cleaning and restoring the entire fuel system. This included removing the tank and cleaning it with the Beyond Balistics solution, power washing it multiple times, drying it thoroughly, rinsing with IPA, drying again with heat gun and compressed air. Also, cleaning out the lines, fuel rail, and replacing the fuel pump with an OEM-style one. During the cleaning process, I replaced several hoses - including the breather hose on the fuel tank, which turned out to be the cause of the earlier fuel leak. This is what the old fuel filter looked like: Fuel tank before cleaning: Dirty Fuel Tank.mp4   Fuel tank after cleaning (some staining remains): Clean Fuel Tank.mp4 Both the OEM 270cc and new DeatschWerks 550cc injectors were cleaned professionally by a shop. Before reassembling everything, I tested the fuel flow by running the pump output into a container at the fuel filter location - flow looked good. I then fitted the new fuel filter and reassembled the rest of the system. Fuel Flow Test.mp4 Test 1 - 550cc injectors Ran the new fuel pump with its supplied diagonal strainer (different from OEM’s flat strainer) and my 550cc injectors using the same resized-injector map I had successfully used before. At first, it idled roughly and stalled when I applied throttle. Checked the spark plugs and found that they were fouled with carbon (likely from the earlier overly rich running when the injectors were clogged). After cleaning the plugs, the car started fine. However, it would only idle for 30–60 seconds before stalling, and while driving it would feel like a “fuel cut” after a few seconds - though it wouldn’t fully stall. Test 2 – Strainer swap Suspecting the diagonal strainer might not be reaching the tank bottom, I swapped it for the original flat strainer and filled the tank with ~45L of fuel. The issue persisted exactly the same. Test 3 – OEM injectors To eliminate tuning variables, I reinstalled the OEM 270cc injectors and reverted to the original map. Cleaned the spark plugs again just in-case. The stalling and “fuel cut” still remained.   At this stage, I suspect an intermittent power or connection fault at the fuel pump hanger, caused during the cleaning process. This has led me to look into getting Frenchy’s fuel hanger and replacing the unit entirely. TL;DR: Cleaned and restored the fuel system (tank, lines, rail, pump). Tested 550cc injectors with the same resized-injector map as before, but the car stalls at idle and experiences what feels like “fuel cut” after a few seconds of driving. Swapped back to OEM injectors with original map to rule out tuning, but the issue persists. Now suspecting an intermittent power or connection fault at the fuel pump hanger, possibly cause by the cleaning process.  
×
×
  • Create New...