Jump to content
SAU Community

Power Loss On Downshifts, Bouncing Idle And Slight Hesitation At Specific Rev Point -R34Gtt


Recommended Posts

i'd say try a larger BOV that vents to atmosphere with a softer spring pressure....keep the airflow going in the one direction....feel sorry for you guys in Aussie with all your legal drama.

That will cause tune Issues with the afm though that will need addressing.

yeah but they'd be easier to fix. his mixtures will will be richer for a short time when he closed the throttle....could be sorted out whenever he wanted.

A dual stage BOV would be better, stage one plumb back stage two atmo, that way there is some air going back to AFM and some well not, the trick is tuning it to get the right amount

Well took off dipstick and can smell fuel big time. Will be taking off fuel pressure regulator vacuum hoses to look for fuel later. Stay tuned..this could be it, a leaking reg.

Thanks, is it better to get new though, never know when the used ones let go- will check if I can use 33 one on a 34- i think the 34 neo has 2 dampers n 1 reg

If a fuel reg is bad or fuel related problem on a skyline not holding pressure

There is the pulsation damper on the fuel rail to check

Turn it off and check how far the screw on the damper is sticking out and leave it overnight

Check if it has gone in and moved if so the fuel pressure is leaking if not all good

You were complaining about the fuel economy and the tuner has already told you the o2 is getting lazy

If a bad o2 was stuck too lean every time in closed loop it would try to dump fuel in to try to make the mixtures right

Check if your o2 signal is fluctuating when warm

Should be swinging high and low every second

Also with the intake I would try to modify the existing one as moving the afm further or closer to the turbo will affect the tune

And your std bov may not be flowing enough air for that turbo so it will still suffer from reversion and the std bov will leak

The only way a fuel reg can dump fuel in manifold is through the vac/boost line, start car and pull line off and look, for enough fuel to cause these problems it will flow out at you

I have personally never seen a factory fuel reg go like that

If a fuel reg is bad or fuel related problem on a skyline not holding pressure

There is the pulsation damper on the fuel rail to check

Turn it off and check how far the screw on the damper is sticking out and leave it overnight

Check if it has gone in and moved if so the fuel pressure is leaking if not all good

You were complaining about the fuel economy and the tuner has already told you the o2 is getting lazy

If a bad o2 was stuck too lean every time in closed loop it would try to dump fuel in to try to make the mixtures right

Check if your o2 signal is fluctuating when warm

Should be swinging high and low every second

Also with the intake I would try to modify the existing one as moving the afm further or closer to the turbo will affect the tune

And your std bov may not be flowing enough air for that turbo so it will still suffer from reversion and the std bov will leak

so is the standard BOV still considered adequate for these size turbo's, eg GT30/GT35..

Ive seen aftermarket ones and they come with a range of springs, eg 6psi , so if using that then boosting under 6psi would give a shhhzutututu which might be a way around the legal

side for people that want that, but you'd still have some reversion is that right?

On a stock rubber intake, the BOV return is quite close to the turbo inlet, so maybe modify the intake pipe to mimick that, so the entry point is close to the inlet and theres

a couple of turns before the AFM is connected.

Edited by AngryRB

I'm still using a stock bov with a 3076. I crushed it to apply more spring pressure so it doesn't leak.

Previously had reversion issues, modified return angle in inlet pipe and it fixed it.

Was surprising as the return was angled slightly to the turbo previously but obviously not enough.

It's a very simple thing to change, angled nd is very likely the cause of Ron ' s issues.

Anywhere that welds ally can do it. And cheap. And quickly.

  • Like 1

The only way a fuel reg can dump fuel in manifold is through the vac/boost line, start car and pull line off and look, for enough fuel to cause these problems it will flow out at you

I have personally never seen a factory fuel reg go like that

thats exactly what I will be doing tomorrow morning - check for fuel in the reg and damper vacuum hoses. Hopefully I will find fuel and confirm a dead reg - can i use R33 reg on 34 /possibly wolverine's one or do I need a R34 one - wreckers or buy new? Hopefully no touch up tuning required, but how to check if its providing the req. fuel pressure under load - else it will lean out n go bang haha..

I do remember when DVS Jez had a go at my 'stock' car 3 years ago he mentioned the fuel pressure's playing funny and advised me to get a spare r34 reg, which I got thanks to Johnny, so the second time round I went up to Jez with the spare reg, we didnt end up fitting it cos it was alrite then.. Now I have to look for that little reg, dunno where I put it or if it still there lol..

And yes I use a stock 'crushed' bov like Ben C34 does.

Edited by rondofj

^ lol that was soooooo long ago aye..

I have access to a hand held wideband, happy to spend a few hours diagnosing your car.. payment = beer :D

no worries mate will hit you up if need be, let me test a few other bits over a couple weekends - fuel reg, iron out boost leaks, earths, new O2 sensor etc; I have decided not to get the wideband cos of extra costs of equipment itself, weld bung away from turbine housing, touching up tune etc..

Do u guys get ur NGK O2 sensors from repco/autobarn/bursons etc?

I still prefer to change it and keep it enabled as it was tuned with it - do any of the R34 NEO people use the r33 NGK O2 sensors with the plugs cut off and wires crimped together? NGK dont make a R34 one, rang em up. Else the universal PEC O2 sensor from Vulture Motorsport is what I got and its gone funny after just 3 years!

Edited by rondofj

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...