Jump to content
SAU Community

Power Loss On Downshifts, Bouncing Idle And Slight Hesitation At Specific Rev Point -R34Gtt


Recommended Posts

I have the same symptoms in my R32.

Would drive normally like 90% of the time, then occastionally would lose all power at 3000+rpm. Off and on, i would get power 1 second, lose all the next. Sometimes on and off repeat. Then I would sit in lower rpms for a bit and it would drive fine.

Now it is far worse. Diring a drive around town it will cut all power above 3000 and not let me rev above it, then it would allow me again only to cut all power again as if i completely let off the throttle and then it would stall out going 40mph losing all power steering and power brakes with it which led to a serious oh shit! moment.

I'm fairly certain it's the AFM. I accidently drove the car around with it unplugged once and it drove exactly the same way. Wouldn't rev above 3000 rpm etc. When the car would work it was working fine, I did 4 laps on a track with it when it was a minor issue without it happening once so i'm fairly certain it's not fuel pump, coils, or anything of that nature.

Edited by Kanaric

Condition of plugs from cyl 1,2 & 5, also see the top of cylinders where they sit. Doesnt seem to be running too rich (black) or too lean (white) ie the plugs, but maybe a bit on the rich side?

post-49401-14076531188574_thumb.jpgpost-49401-14076531362503_thumb.jpgpost-49401-14076531635675_thumb.jpgpost-49401-14076531836719_thumb.jpgpost-49401-1407653198521_thumb.jpg

More bov entry angle/intake pipe pics for you fellas, dont look too bad hey..

Scotty, GTSBoy, Johhny..will be changed nws, but last thing after all else

post-49401-14076534786091_thumb.jpgpost-49401-14076534985257_thumb.jpg

Edited by rondofj

That angle is pretty much the same as the stock angle (seeing as the steel return pipe and rubber is the stock one, you'd expect so), but I think that doesn't work too well when you get rid of the convoluted inlet elbow. Smooth inlet pipe seems to demand a steeper return angle, more towards the compressor. As most advice on here has already said.

So my 1 channel monitor (ign timing) shows that normal 40-60,80km/h street driving under 3k rpms sees the timing move in the region 20-40 ish, depending on revs/load; high boost/high rpm n crazy speeds sees very low timing going down to 10ish, definitely 10s. Shifting UP the timing will drop to 10,15 etc for a second when shifting/releasing throttle. Shifting DOWN sees the timing go UP to high 40s, (highest 48) for a second before normalising in the 20-30 band. Is this why I feel the laaaaag/power loss, do other areas of timing sound right??

This may be a stupid question but did all these issues exist when you took it off your tuner?

Are you running the same boost level that it has been tuned for?. Did your tuner know of the knocking problem? What you are describing does not make sense at all.

When I took it to tuner it had Nistune so no bogging down under downshifts/load, no bouncing idle, no stickiness' at 1500-2000, but yes all other probs- it was very thirsty and intermittent ly running rough/crap now n then long before that. Same boost. And yes absolutely NO knocking over 20-30 with O2 sensor plugged in and feedback enabled. Yesterday the intake was really really hot with O2 unplugged thats why it knocked I think. Possibly running too lean

Only recommendation I have is if you want to manage it yourself is buy a afr kit for $200 that way you know exactly what your mixtures are, and also log a real-time graph on your ignition to see if there is variance when it is on boost. Knock sensors are good but not perfect and if you have a noisy gates belt or cam/bearing type noise it could be triggering knock or you could be detonating and not hearing it. Your tune maybe out because you had it tuned with boost leaks and now it is running lean at wot but dumps fuel when off throttle because of the reverberation problem. Or the gates belt is causing variance in timing, might have to do the aem mod to the cas to stabilise timing. So many things it could be. Maybe get an afr kit and see how it reads.

Or maybe bring it back to your tuner.

Edited by XGTRX

One thing is if you downshift and dont suddenly give it load, ie doubleshift/doubleclutch or wait a second or two before engaging the clutch the car wont bog down and lose power like it normally does., it will hook up well n go.

so you have a dodgy AFM by looks of it, your OEM coils were cheap, your BOV returns on the wrong angle, you have leaks and using a gates timing belt.

Its no surprise that it doesn't run perfect, best just to buy the stuff quality and new to avoid all this stuff around with it,

Edited by AngryRB
  • Like 1

One thing is if you downshift and dont suddenly give it load, ie doubleshift/doubleclutch or wait a second or two before engaging the clutch the car wont bog down and lose power like it normally does., it will hook up well n go.

Reverberation issue, that's why I assume.

Double clutching a syncro box is something they do in movies, do it in real life and you will destroy your syncros, double clutching is for dog boxes only and also the slowest way of shifting

so you have a dodgy AFM by looks of it, your OEM coils were cheap, your BOV returns on the wrong angle, you have leaks and using a gates timing belt.

Its no surprise that it doesn't run perfect, best just to buy the stuff quality and new to avoid all this stuff around with it,

That comments half retarded and maybe sarcastic. What is dodgy about my afm, its not a fake z32, my coils being cheap dont mean its not legit, although thats possible (car dont have symptoms of bad coils does it?!). It was n still is advertised as genuine nissan OEM items. As for leaks, everyones got some and mines largely sorted. And I dont have issues with my Gates belt, most people run one dont they, and I would use one again! So that just leaves the bov entry...

Double clutching a syncro box is something they do in movies, do it in real life and you will destroy your syncros, double clutching is for dog boxes only and also the slowest way of shifting

So you mean granny shifting, not double clutching like you should, isn't real?

Dang.

But on topic, I'd change the return point for the bov. Im actually in the process of putting a stock bov on my cefiro, and Mark (unigroup) said to be carefull how I plumb it in, and pretty much said point it directly at the turbo.

Broken record I know, but its worth a shot yes?

As for you fuel economy, are you thrashing it everywhere? cause 250km to a tank is shocking.

I've got the 02 turned off, doesnt affect the on boost performance and I easliy get 400 -450km to a tank

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
    • I know I have to get a wheel alignment but until then I just need to bring the rear tyres in a bit they're wearing to the belt on the inside and brand new on the outside edge. I did shorten the arms a bit but got it wrong now after a few klms the Slip and VDC lights come on. I'd just like to get it to a point where I can drive for another week or two before getting an alignment. I've had to pay a lot of other stuff recently so doing it myself is my only option 
    • You just need a wheel alignment after, so just set them to the same as current and drive to the shop. As there are 2 upper links it may also be worth adding adjustable upper front links at the same time; these reduce bump steer when you move the camber (note that setting those correctly takes a lot longer as you have to recheck the camber at each length of the toe arm, through a range of movement, so you could just ignore that unless the handling becomes unpredictable)
×
×
  • Create New...