Jump to content
SAU Community

Power Loss On Downshifts, Bouncing Idle And Slight Hesitation At Specific Rev Point -R34Gtt


Recommended Posts

650km.. Boy is that even possible. I struggle to get 250kms! Well I found that my dipstick doesnt actually smell of fuel, I was mistaken, but my fpr vacuum hose has a slight fuel smell, so will replace the fpr, the fuel damper vac hose is ok though. But then no fuel shoots out at idle and 2000-2500rpms with disconnected hose???? Is it possible that it only happens under boost at load?

Set the TPS to idle at 0.48V instead of 0.41, hard to get 0.45, its too sensitive. O2 sensor unplugged n switched off. My O2 voltage doesnt fluctuate with it connected at idle so its def shot.

I found that I have lost a lot of power when boosting since the last couple days and its started to get high knock levels 130-140 at 5000rpms in third which it WASNT doing before. AFM peaked at 4.955V, what could it be, I havent changed my setup but I did lose the grey TPS plug cap thats supposed to go to the auto transmission wire something (mines manual). So I have the brown n black TPS plugs connected but grey one just has wires running thru with the end cap lost, is this a bridging cap?? Knocking a sign of leaning out?

Edited by rondofj

Well no I adjusted it after driving because I read it should be in the 0.45-0.5V range, if thats what it does then I should adjust it back to 0.41V?

Ok so TPS will be adjusted back. One thing I can confirm my afm voltage always goes sky high usually 4.9+V under high boost/rpm - had to switch off the airflow warning check light in powerfc.

While at it, chuck a bottle o injector cleaner in the tank for peace of mind..

Edited by rondofj

thats exactly what I will be doing tomorrow morning - check for fuel in the reg and damper vacuum hoses. Hopefully I will find fuel and confirm a dead reg - can i use R33 reg on 34 /possibly wolverine's one or do I need a R34 one - wreckers or buy new? Hopefully no touch up tuning required, but how to check if its providing the req. fuel pressure under load - else it will lean out n go bang haha..

I do remember when DVS Jez had a go at my 'stock' car 3 years ago he mentioned the fuel pressure's playing funny and advised me to get a spare r34 reg, which I got thanks to Johnny, so the second time round I went up to Jez with the spare reg, we didnt end up fitting it cos it was alrite then.. Now I have to look for that little reg, dunno where I put it or if it still there lol..

And yes I use a stock 'crushed' bov like Ben C34 does.

You had the car tuned and apparently it is fine they keep saying, when they tune a car they have an probe up the exhaust yeah? So its hard to understand this fuel consumption problem unless they just tuned it mostly on a full throttle.

To get 18-20L/100km you'd have to be on the gas pretty heavy, if most of your driving is normal then surely the injectors arnt putting the fuel in, not sure if

a car would run if its injectors were open 70% all the time, you have 600ish cc injectors so unless they are more than 50% open all the time then it doesn't make

sense. The only way to use this much must be from somewhere else.

If the reg is leaking and getting worse, you'd have a a few very rich cylinders and maybe some very lean from less pressure ,eg cylinders 5 and 6 leaning

If the fuel return was hooked up wrong you could have a build up of pressure from fuel not being returned to the tank, at full vacumn this build up could be

relieved by being sucked thru the reg into the manifold from a shit reg and getting you your high fuel consumption.

If the O2 sensor appears to be acting weird then surely this is an indicator of an outside factor ( REG) that is leaking independently to the other

sensors etc, so trys to fix the overfueling but only adds to the roughness. A continual changing of the system to try and normalise and outside

fault?

On the dyno they assume that there is no leaking reg, and that each cylinder gets the fuel they are programing, not sure but if they are using the

exhaust probe to check the fuel mixture they could be tuning it thinking its ok but in reality its false because the regs adding fuel too. When on

dyno you'd think this sort of fuel consumption would be obvious, and could diagnose it by engine braking and checking the fuel mixtures etc.

just a few ideas

Edited by AngryRB

You can't clean injectors in the car very easily, and some have filters inside which require them to be backflushed. If you were at all worried about them you will need to get them on a flow bench to rule them out.

So when are you looking at the intake? :P

Im suspecting the afm all along, its supposedly a genuine used z32 imported from the US, looks legit with orange sticker, mesh etc. Might post up pics later. Can you not block off the sensor element with a tab glued to the rear? So it reads one way only.

Got the boost leak tester out and found 3 more leaks at 14-19psi- 2 cooler joiners and one brake booster hose, its pretty minor, doesnt froth up hard from the soapy water, just very light frothing/tiny bubbles.

Set TPS back to 0.41V and got german Liquid Moly injector cleaner in the tank. Smells exactly like kerosene that I paid $16 /300ml for! Car still doesnt run right down low, doesnt sound and feel happy. Am not so worried about the power loss on shifting, moreso the running crap/no power, excessive fuel useage. O2 is disabled AND disconnected. What the hell could it be apart from afm? Intake pipe mod will come AFTER i solve this problem first,.

One thing I remember 3yrs ago without the z32 and 630ccs on a stock 208rwkw car I was still returning 16-17L/100kms. I had the 255l/hr Walbro pump/(with direct voltage feed) from that time. Now the economys shot up to 20-21L/100kms, and inconsistent unhappy car- was same with Nistune.

Buy a wideband, forget about spending $100 on another boring half homo narrowband. Might as well not run one.

Without reading o2 all your hard work diagnosing is just a waste.

  • Like 1

I can tell you fellas one thing- switching off AND UNPLUGGING the O2 sensor in my car isn't a good idea at all (shit tune???!), it starts knocking with really high levels on the FIRST high boost pulls, and knocks at 5000rpms+ pretty early. Plug it back in and its all good, no knocks so far. And driving normally 60-80kmh, the O2 voltage fluctuates betwn 0.36-0.42ish volts, then after sometime it gets to the 0.68-0.76V range thats when it gets 'sticky', jerky, hesitating/ rough. So I will get a new bloody O2 sensor n be done with it. Cos O2 off dont work on my car too well to convince me.

Am going to fit new joiner where boost leak was, sand the ground point properly and remove the bov blockoff plate. And will look into a tailpipe wideband sensor/gauge.

That makes no sense

The factory narrowband has zero bearing on boost.

It doesn't trim fuel when you're on power.

My leaks were minor- tiny frothy bubbles, sealed now with new joiner and tightening, but apart from that, yes thats my experience with this frigging O2 sensor. Will a r33 NTK one fit? R34 one cost $100 more for a plug the only difference I think. Anyways the bov block plates gone and I've sanded the ground point at battery to chasis. At least theres a peace of mind that all these friggin areas /sensors of the car have been looked at/sorted.

Edited by rondofj

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Thanks folks - I've saved a few links and I'll have to think of potential cable/adapters/buying fittings. First step will be seeing if I can turn the curren abortion of a port into something usable, then get all BSPT'y on it. I did attempt to look at the OEM sender male end to see if it IS tapered because as mentioned you should be able to tell by looking at it... well, I don't know if I can. If I had to guess it looks like *maybe* 0.25 of a mm skinnier at the bottom of the thread compared to where the thread starts. So if it is tapered it's pretty slight - Or all the examples of BSPT vs BSPP are exaggerated for effect in their taper size.
    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
×
×
  • Create New...