Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Morning all,

Whilst I'm not currently a skyboat captain I am a diahard SAUer and am looking for some direction re my wannabe F14 fighter jet (read; S14 that struggles to stay on the ground).

I've recently finished my motor setup and have had it tuned, which resulted in 295rwkw on a DD roller.. Its definitely motoring along when set to 'loud'. For reference its the usual SR business with a GTX3071R.

The problem I'm having is that the car seems to want to catch air with the smallest bump in the road, and generally wants to break loose a lot. Let me be clear though, the car has a lot of cornering traction (I fall out of the seat before it understeers) and it has a lot of straight line traction for putting power down. Its when I want to use BOTH that things get silly, AND the obvious issue of taking flight on bumps.

Now I know everyones going to say that its normal for the amount of power etc. but I really do want to hear some feedback on what others have done to make their cars more manageable. What changes and mods have been performed that will make the car more 'seated' on the road and generally able to belt a little harder through the twisties.

The existing chassis setup as follows:

Tein superstreets 6/6kg (quite smooth and comfortable, generally absorb bumps well)

Castor rods

Rear camber arms

Rear toe arms

(full camber and toe adjustment)

The alignment as follows:

0 toe front

2mm toe in per side rear

2 degree camber front

1.2 degree camber rear

So, what sort of things will help keep this thing better grounded? Heavier spring rates? Fatter sway bars? A different alignment? And what will be the side effects if any?

I want to drive the car in a little more anger, which was easily achieved @ 240kw. Please give some suggestions on what could aid this.

Cheers!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/446443-keeping-300kw-on-the-ground/
Share on other sites

what wheel size and tires are you using?

17x8 +15 front 215/45 Potenza RE002

17x9 +28 rear 235/45 Potenza RE002

Offsets are being achieved with spacers to give the car 20mm more track than standard with 20mm wider front track than rear (factory ratio front to rear).

As noted the cars got a lot of traction in most ways, but its less than stable when you want to try use that traction to its fullest. I really want to push it out of corners but its possibly squatting and picking up the front too much when I do.. Which I believe would also be why when on power it tends to want to catch air (squatts a lot and picks the front up).

Toe settings are wrong.

Get them reset.

-3.00 total toe on the front

+2.5 total toe on the rear.

Camber is fine. Wind off the rear damper.

Cheers man. Can you confirm if these are MM or degrees?

I need to re centre my steering wheel as I went to a quick release so will get these done when I do.

It's too stiff in the rear. 6kg at the front would probably be nicer with 5 at the rear, possibly even 4. If you like the handling balance that having that much rear roll resitance is giving, then replace it with stiffer rear ARB (adjustable of course).

actually thats a good point, whats skipping, the front or the rear?

It's too stiff in the rear. 6kg at the front would probably be nicer with 5 at the rear, possibly even 4. If you like the handling balance that having that much rear roll resitance is giving, then replace it with stiffer rear ARB (adjustable of course).

Are you sure about this? I'm aware that dropping the rear rates is going to make it have more traction as it will be able to squat more, but how will it also help out of corners?

Once this issue is sorted im fairly sure that I will need a bit more resistance all round to compensate for the increased corner speed. Maybe new sways front and rear will make the car feel firmer on the road? And perhaps an increase in front spring rate will give the effect you are describing? Or do you feel the softer rear will definitely be better?

Halfway there I have the running gear and most of the front end

lol I expected this for an answer.

Well, spring rate balance is important - actually wheel rate balance, which is the sum of all spring components (actual springs and ARBs) multiplied by their respective lever arm lengths. The rear suspension for S14s is the same as Skyline, so what's true at that end of a Skyline is true of an S14 also. The fronts will be a bit different because the suspension geometry is different between struts and double arms. But nevertheless, and despite the lighter engine at the front of the S14, I would say that having the same spring rates front and rear is going to give you too much rear roll stiffness. That's a separate issue to traction. 6kg rear springs are pretty stiff for the street. I have ~5kg at the front of my R32 and ~4 at the rear and I have traction problems with that. The rates are high enough to limit weight transfer. When you consider that stock spring rates are ~3kg/mm you can see that a 100% increase might limit the abilities to hook up.

High spring rates are required to limit body roll and absorb high frequency loads when running at high speeds (on the track, or on reasonably decent roads). Stiff springs do not work well at low road speeds especially where the roads are a bit rough. Even a sizable bump, when taken at low speed, represents a lower frequency input than stiff springs are "tuned" for. You really cannot have it both ways. Any car that reviewers claim handles massively well (so, BMW M cars, etc) won't have really high wheel rates. They will have sensible rates and top shelf damping (and top shelf geometry design, etc etc).

With respect to how it will "help it out of corners" if you softened the rear - all of what I said above applies. Reduced roll stiffness increases weight transfer onto the outer wheel which helps with drive. Reduced total stiffness increases weight transfer towards the rear regardless of whether you are going straight or accelerating out of a bend. Adding stiffness to the front helps with the balance between front and rear, but does nothing to improve the weigh transfer to the rear - it would actually make it worse.

GTSBoy:

Sorry to throw a spanner in the works, I was SURE they were F6R6 but have just looked online and found that Tein list them as F6R4... That would probably explain why the car has a lot of rear end traction for what it is. Sorry for killing your time on explaining the suggestion, my error.

Now comes the part I hate.

I've analysed your response a few times and have noted a few key points surrounding frequencies and variation between high and low speed driving, and am getting the impression you are basing advice on the fundamentals of regular street driving. The reason why this is the part I hate is because I don't like being that guy talking about how fully sick they drive, so don't get me wrong here. I'll explain more.

For regular driving most people think the car is close to stock. Its solid, firm, well behaved, absorbs bumps well etc.though the car feels incredibly light on power, and the lift I'm describing is when I'm trying to use upward of 70% throttle. In the last couple of weeks I have been fiddling with boost control and the car has come off the ground twice when fully loaded in 3rd. Not exactly what I would consider low speed nor low frequency. I am actually trying to resolve the opposite of this, where I'm going fast and the wheel cops a reasonably hit from the road.

The whole exit speed thing does make sense in what you were saying before, but after checking advertised rates I am a little confused again. I guess the trick may be in ARBs but I am not sure at the moment. Originally I was leaning heavily to a stiffer setup with larger diameter monotube shocks. Now not sure what to do or think, wishing I could just work it out for myself..

OK. That's a reasonably large spanner to put into the works.

Rear subframe and diff bushes are a place you could look to. If the subframe is moving under big power loads (ie squishing the bushes up all in one direction or torquing the subframe relative to the car, then you hit a bump, maybe the sudden release of torque is causing a reaction back through the suspension arms and breaking traction + possibly having a vertical component making it feel like the car is jumping. It's pretty much a sudden axle tramp sort of thing.

No HICAS on this thing, yeah? What condition are the toe control rod ends in?

What diff?

I would try some pineapples first perhaps, see if it behaves better (or at least different). You could also try unhooking the rear ARB to see if changing the way load is transferred from one side of the car to the other has an effect on this behaviour. Beware, the car will probably be an understeery pig set up like this. Use caution!

Damn I didn't even think to mention subframe positioning, I keep assuming those mods are the norm.

I've got pineapples in place which are locking the subframe at maximum height. The diff is a helical from an S15 with a 4.3 ratio, hook up from this is good. Always predictable, pulls the nose in rather pushes the arse out.

Non HICAS in the S14. Adjustable toe rods are rose jointed and near new, as are the camber and castor.

Haha no rear ARB, that would possibly be quite scary. I really want to be able to get the gas on earlier with a bit more confidence, grrr.

You have in the first post that you have rear camber and toe arms, but no traction arms. How much have you lengthened the camber arm relative to stock?. If you lengthen the camber arm and not the traction arm you end up with a large change to the toe curve during the suspension travel, ie. Bump steer. The wheel will toe out under compression if the camber arm is lengthened and the traction arm is not. So when you hit a bump at speed, wheel goes up, toes out and it breaks loose.

So either put the standard camber and toe arms back in and live with the hektik rear camber (assuming the car is low).

Or

By some traction arms, make a bump steer gauge and set it up properly.

to keep 300kw on the ground without melting your tyres is to use softer compound 255 wide tyres or semi slicks. Minimal amounts of camber because you want the full face of the tyre on the road and softer damper settings as you want the ass end to squat and put weight onto the rear tyres. Anything less with a 300kw responsive setup you'll be the frymaster of the streets

  • 2 weeks later...

I find that my 32 was terrible around the mountain, it was bouncy and soft and all over the shop, unstable and really didn't let me push it. now it was no weapon in the power department. 260rwhp.

I found that with my coilovers they were to soft for me. I had 8 fronts 6 rears. I bought 10kg springs and put the 8s on the rear. If feels SO much nicer to drive just around the streets and with it slightly stiffer (less of a bouncy role) Was like shock rebound was to high and springs to soft. less body role from the springs as well around corners. I find soft suspension is for straight line squat and grip. but soon as you hit a corner its to sloppy and feels like its floating around to much.

That's my personal experience anyway.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • See if you can thermal epoxy a heatsink or two onto it?
    • The other problem was one of those "oh shit we are going to die moments". Basically the high spec Q50s have a full electric steering rack, and the povo ones had a regular hydraulic rack with an electric pump.  So couple of laps into session 5 as I came into turn 2 (big run off now, happily), the dash turned into a christmas tree and the steering became super heavy and I went well off. I assumed it was a tyre failure so limped to the pits, but everything was OK. But....the master warning light was still on so I checked the DTCs and saw – C13E6 “Heat Protection”. Yes, that bloody steering rack computer sitting where the oil cooler should be has its own sensors and error logic, and decided I was using the steering wheel too much. I really appreciated the helpful information in the manual (my bold) POSSIBLE CAUSE • Continuing the overloading steering (Sports driving in the circuit etc,) “DATA MONITOR” >> “C/M TEMPERATURE”. The rise of steering force motor internal temperature caused the protection function to operate. This is not a system malfunction. INSPECTION END So, basically the electric motor in the steering rack got to 150c, and it decided to shut down without warning for my safety. Didn't feel safe. Short term I'll see if I can duct some air to that motor (the engine bay is sealed pretty tight). Long term, depending on how often this happens, I'll look into swapping the povo spec electric/hydraulic rack in. While the rack should be fine the power supply to the pump will be a pain and might be best to deal with it when I add a PDM.
    • And finally, 2 problems I really need to sort.  Firstly as Matt said the auto trans is not happy as it gets hot - I couldn't log the temps but the gauge showed 90o. On the first day I took it out back in Feb, because the coolant was getting hot I never got to any auto trans issues; but on this day by late session 3 and then really clearly in 4 and 5 as it got hotter it just would not shift up. You can hear the issue really clearly at 12:55 and 16:20 on the vid. So the good news is, literally this week Ecutek finally released tuning for the jatco 7 speed. I'll have a chat to Racebox and see what they can do electrically to keep it cooler and to get the gears, if anything. That will likely take some R&D and can only really happen on track as it never gets even warm with road use. I've also picked up some eye wateringly expensive Redline D6 ATF to try, it had the highest viscosity I could find at 100o so we will see if that helps (just waiting for some oil pan gaskets so I can change it properly). If neither of those work I need to remove the coolant/trans interwarmer and the radiator cooler and go to an external cooler....somewhere.....(goodbye washer reservoir?), and if that fails give up on this mad idea and wait for Nissan to release the manual 400R
    • So, what else.... Power. I don't know what it is making because I haven't done a post tune dyno run yet; I will when I get a chance. It was 240rwkw dead stock. Conclusion from the day....it does not need a single kw more until I sort some other stuff. It comes on so hard that I could hear the twin N1 turbos on the R32 crying, and I just can't use what it has around a tight track with the current setup. Brakes. They are perfect. Hit them hard all day and they never felt like having an issue; you can see in the video we were making ground on much lighter cars on better tyres under brakes. They are standard (red sport) calipers, standard size discs in DBA5000 2 piece, Winmax pads and Motul RBF600 fluid, all from Matty at Racebrakes Sydney. Keeping in mind the car is more powerful than my R32 and weighs 1780, he clearly knows his shit. Suspension. This is one of the first areas I need to change. It has electronically controlled dampers from factory, but everything is just way too soft for track work even on the hardest setting (it is nice when hustling on country roads though). In particular it rolls into oversteer mid corner and pitches too much under hard braking so it becomes unstable eg in the turn 1 kink I need to brake early, turn through the kink then brake again so I don't pirouette like an AE86. I need to get some decent shocks with matched springs and sway bars ASAP, even if it is just a v1 setup until I work out a proper race/rally setup later. Tyres. I am running Yoko A052 in 235/45/18 all round, because that was what I could get in approximately the right height on wheels I had in the shed (Rays/Nismo 18x8 off the old Leaf actually!). As track tyres they are pretty poor; I note GTSBoy recently posted a porker comparo video including them where they were about the same as AD09.....that is nothing like a top line track tyre. I'll start getting that sorted but realistically I should get proper sized wheels first (likely 9.5 +38 front and 11 +55 at the rear, so a custom order, and I can't rotate them like the R32), then work out what the best tyre option is. BTW on that, Targa Tas had gone to road tyres instead of semi slicks now so that is a whole other world of choices to sort. Diff. This is the other thing that urgently needs to be addressed. It left massive 1s out of the fish hook all day, even when I was trying not too (you can also hear it reving on the video, and see the RPM rising too fast compared to speed in the data). It has an open diff that Infiniti optimistically called a B-LSD for "Brake Limited Slip Diff". It does good straight line standing start 11s but it is woeful on the track. Nismo seem to make a 2 way for it.
    • Also, I logged some data from the ECU for each session (mostly oil pressures and various temps, but also speed, revs etc, can't believe I forgot accelerator position). The Ecutek data loads nicely to datazap, I got good data from sessions 2, 3 and 4: https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-2?log=0&data=7 https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-3?log=0&data=6 https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-4?log=0&data=6 Each session is cut into 3 files but loaded together, you can change between them in the top left. As the test sessions are mostly about the car, not me, I basically start by checking the oil pressure (good, or at least consistent all day). These have an electrically controlled oil pump which targets 25psi(!) at low load and 50 at high. I'm running a much thicker oil than recommended by nissan (they said 0w20, I'm running 10w40) so its a little higher. The main thing is that it doesn't drop too far, eg in the long left hand fish hook, or under brakes so I know I'm not getting oil surge. Good start. Then Oil and Coolant temp, plus intercooler and intake temps, like this: Keeping in mind ambient was about 5o at session 2, I'd say the oil temp is good. The coolant temp as OK but a big worry for hot days (it was getting to 110 back in Feb when it was 35o) so I need to keep addressing that. The water to air intercooler is working totally backwards where we get 5o air in the intake, squish/warm it in the turbos (unknown temp) then run it through the intercoolers which are say 65o max in this case, then the result is 20o air into the engine......the day was too atypical to draw a conclusion on that I think, in the united states of freedom they do a lot of upsizing the intercooler and heat exchanger cores to get those temps down but they were OK this time. The other interesting (but not concerning) part for me was the turbo speed vs boost graph: I circled an example from the main straight. With the tune boost peaks at around 18psi but it deliberately drops to about 14psi at redline because the turbos are tiny - they choke at high revs and just create more heat than power if you run them hard all the way. But you can also see the turbo speed at the same time; it raises from about 180,000rpm to 210,000rpm which the boost falls....imagine the turbine speed if they held 18psi to redline. The wastegates are electrically controlled so there is a heap of logic about boost target, actual boost, delta etc etc but it all seems to work well
×
×
  • Create New...