Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

I am selecting some new wheels for my R33. I am looking to change my car back to a more factory spec to be eligible for more Tarmac rally events.

One of the things I am going to change is the wheel size. If I stick to the 2" high and 2" wide increase rule I can go to 18 x 8.5 but the question is do I need to?

I am current ally running stock R33 brembos and am happy to keep using them so I can get away with a 17" rim.

17" PROS

I have weighed both options with a AO50 245 tyre and the 17" is lighter by 1.4kg per corner.

The 17" tyre is $70.00 cheaper per corner

18" PROS

Rolling diameter is 26mm bigger which would help me stay with the current diff ratio.

Might be able to pick up cheap second hand tyres for track days etc.

better brake cooling.

Saying all the above you all might have some more info for me to help

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/448403-17-vs-18-wheels-for-motorsport/
Share on other sites

Lol massive fail.

I dropped my phone and it sent the post before I was finished.

Fat hands and iPhone do not work.

Anyway as I was saying if you have any advice for me that would be great .

Things I don't know are reliability, handling and geometry changes.

Thanks for reading both my posts lol.

Geometry changes? That's going to be dealt with in your suspension setup, not related to wheel diameter.

Price and availability of the sizes you want are probably the biggest deciding factors - if you can't readily get them, or they are ridiculously priced then you'd be looking elsewhere. Competing to win, vs entering to have a run are also far different things that means you might just have to deal with the price difference.

Assuming you're looking only at the Yoko A050, 245 section width. Are there different nominal aspect ratios, or tyre heights for a given rim diameter?

Big call to make any definitive statement about durability/reliability of the tyre based on its rim diameter, although a taller tyre is going to have more rubber to play with for a given distance travelled. I'd think the manufacturer would vary carcass construction and rubber compound for the different sizes and rated load capacity. There might be some merit in targeting specific tyre sizes because the sidewall height (or aspect ratio) is going to impact general stiffness/compliance levels and tyre response. Formula 1 vs other open wheel categories highlights this, in my mind at least.

Definitely a mind bender, there's probably going to be a bit of trial and error in finding what you prefer.

Thanks Dale all good points.

I was more thinking car geometry ie cog and rc than suspension. I don't know if this is correct but if I was to use the 18 the car would sit about 13 mm higher with the same suspension settings. Obviously this can be changed but just trying to limit the variables and just evaluate the tyre and rim combo on their own merits.

Thanks again and you are rite it might come do to it is just more cost effective to run 17's.

18" tyres wear better than 17" tyres on a rally. The only geometry changes will be what ride height your car sits at, You need to make sure the suspension can use full compression without fouling on anything.

There is a few R33 GT-R's running round with 18"'s on, so doubt there will be any problems, it's just going to come down to $$

Lol massive fail.

I dropped my phone and it sent the post before I was finished.

Fat hands and iPhone do not work.

Thanks for reading both my posts lol.

My advice would be to buy a real phone,,,not that shitty iphone crappy thing and these problems wouldn't happen.

Cheers

Neil.

  • 4 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • You won't need to do that if your happy to learn to tune it yourself. You 100% do not need to do that. It is not part of the learning process. It's not like driving on track and 'finding the limit by stepping over the limit'. You should not ever accidently blow up an engine and you should have setup the ECU's engine protection to save you from yourself while you are learning anyway. Plenty of us have tuned their own cars, myself included. We still come here for advice/guidance/new ideas etc.  What have you been doing so far to learn how to tune?
    • Put the ECU's MAP line in your mouth. Blow as hard as you can. You should be able to see about 10 kPa, maybe 15 kPa positive pressure. Suck on it. You should be able to generate a decent vacuum to about the same level also. Note that this is only ~2 psi either way. If the MAP is reading -5 psi all the time, ignition on, engine running or not, driving around or not, then it is severely f**ked. Also, you SHOULD NOT BE DRIVING IT WITHOUT A LOAD REFERENCE. You will break the engine. Badly.
    • Could be correct. Meter might be that far out. Compare against a known 5 ohm 1% resistor.
    • @Murray_Calavera  If I were an expert I wouldn't be in here looking for assistance.  I am extremely computer literate, have above average understanding on how things should be working and how they should tie together.  If I need to go to a professional tuner so be it, but I'd much rather learn and do things myself even if it means looking for some guidance along the way and blowing up a few engines. @GTSBoy  I was hoping it would be as simple as a large vacuum leak somewhere but I'm unable to find anything, all lines seem to be well capped or going where they need to be, and when removed there is vacuum felt on the tube.  It would be odd for the Haltech built in MAP to be faulty, the GTT tune I imported had it enabled from the start, I incorrectly assumed it was reading a signal from the stock MAP, but that doesn't exist.  After running a vacuum hose to the ECU the signal doesn't change more than 0.2 in either direction.   I'll probably upload a video of my settings tomorrow, as it stands I'm able to daily drive, but getting stuttering when giving it gas from idle, so pulling away from lights is a slow process of revving it up and feathering the clutch until its moving, then it will accelerate fine.  It sounds like I need to get to the bottom of the manifold pressure issue, but the ignition timing section is most intimidating to me and will probably let a pro do that part.  Tomorrow I'll try a different vacuum line to T off of, with any luck I selected one that was already bypassed during the DBW swap.  (edit: I went out and did it right now, the line I had chosen did appear to have no vacuum on it, it used to go to the front of the intake, I've now completely blocked that one off at the bracket that holds several vacuum lines by the firewall.  I T'd into the vacuum line that goes from that bracket to the vacuum pump at the front of the car, but no change in the MAP readings).  Using the new vacuum line that has obvious vacuum on the hose, im still only getting readings between -6.0 and -5.2.  I'm wondering why the ECU was detecting -5.3 when nothing was connected to the MAP nipple and ECU MAP selected as the source. @feartherb26  I do have +T in the works but wanted to wait until Spring to start with that swap since this is my good winter AWD vehicle.  When removing the butterfly, did it leave a bunch of holes in the manifold that you needed to plug?  I thought about removing it but assumed it would be a mess.   I notice no difference when capping the vacuum line to it or letting it do its thing.  This whole thing has convinced me to just get a forward facing manifold when the time comes though.
    • Update: tested my spark plugs that are supposed to be 5ohms with a 10% deviation and one gave me a 0 ohms reading and the rest were 3.9ohm<, so one bad and the others on their way out.
×
×
  • Create New...