Jump to content
SAU Community

Back End Feels Light


AMR33
 Share

Recommended Posts

Hey folks,

I noticed on the track that the back end of my R33 gtst feels a bight 'light'. What I mean by that is that if im coming down the straight doing around 160-170kms the back feels a bit bouncy and unstable. I've added a bit of weigh in the boot which seemed to help a bit.

Any idea what could be causing this? My guess is that my suspension is simply not cutting it on the track. I currently have JIC height adjustable coilovers but will be considering upgrading when I have the money. Other suspension components (arms etc) are also stock. I lowered the car but dont want to go much lower as it seems to be at good height.

If you guys have any thoughts please let me know.

Cheers

Amir

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't put weight in the back to try to counter bad suspension setup. That's a terrible idea.

Hard to know exactly what is wrong - too many variables. Could be poor alignment (toe), poor damping, slop in bushes, tyres themselves. It could even be the front end causing problems at the back (mismatch, poor alignment etc.)

How do you know it's at a good height? Just from looking at it, or because of the amount of travel (bump and droop) you have available? How has the ride height affected geometry? Are the dampers in good condition? (ie did you buy them second hand?)

Best advice is to take it to a suspension place (preferably one who understands track cars) and check out what you have (bushes, alignment, shock tests etc.). This might give you an insight into what's going on

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cheers guys. I think it is too stiff. I got alignment done by Wheels World - Peter races in Targa etc and is quite knowlegable. He gave the thumbs up for ride height and tried to do the best allignment with the stock components. I agree that adding weight is silly in this instance but I did it to test for any differences.

I am looking for new coilovers and other suspension bits to allow for adjustments so we'll see what happens. Meanwhile its good to get some input so cheers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Got any ideas on the spring rates involved? Which track? Is that straight smooth or does it have any low or high frequency bumps in/on it?

Springs and dampers need to be matched to tune them to a particular frequency. Race cars get stiff springs in order to limit body roll and to make one part of the suspension (the springs) suited to high frequency inputs. That's because when going fast the input of bumps and the transitions caused by changing directions are short and sharp. When running stiff springs, the dampers then have to be matched so that the system isn't horribly underdamped at the frequencies likely to be experienced. Horrible overdamping is also to be avoided, but probably not as bad as underdamping. BUT......one thing that can happen and is spectactularly funny to see is when the rebound damping on a suspension is so high relative to the spring rate that the car will jack itself downward whilst driving around. Each bump compresses the spring, but the damper doesn't allow the suspension to re-extend. A mate of mine when I was a kid had a 116 ALFA with Koni Yellows wound to max stiffness (rebound adjustment only on these things) and stock torsion bars and rear springs. It would arrive into the carpark at work at lo-rider height and over a period of 5 minutes would raise itself back up to normal sky high 116 chassis height. It made it an awful harsh billy cart to drive around in. The suspension was too soft everywhere except in rebound damping, and so when it became compressed, it became too hard everywhere, with no bump travel.

Worth considering both aspects of the above with ref your car. Maybe the springs have been changed on those coilovers, either to higher or lower rates, leading to one or the other problem.

Edited by GTSBoy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cheers for the info mate. The straight Im talking about is quite smooth and doesnt really have bumps - but I seem to feel anything I go over as Im guessing the spring rate is too stiff. I'm not sure what the spring rate is but I can tell you it is very stiff - too stiff. I will look into what you said mate, its great info. I dont think there's much I can do till I get new suspension. Or is there?....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are you still running HICAS? If so, gave you checked your HICAS ball joints? For track use you probably want to ditch HICAS anyway so a lock bar or an eliminator kit might help.

EDIT: Also you might just need more aero. Years ago at Sandown I felt the car getting really light in the rear at the top of hill near the end of the back straight at ~190 clicks, not a nice feeling...

Edited by V28VX37
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are you still running HICAS? If so, gave you checked your HICAS ball joints? For track use you probably want to ditch HICAS anyway so a lock bar or an eliminator kit might help.

EDIT: Also you might just need more aero. Years ago at Sandown I felt the car getting really light in the rear at the top of hill near the end of the back straight at ~190 clicks, not a nice feeling...

no HICAS mate, got the lock bar on. I was also considering aero, maybe a decent rear wing to give it some down force. But for now I think sorting out the suspension is the main priority. And you're right, its not a nice feeling at all. I find myself wanting to come off the gas as Im afraid the rear end will kick out and send me into the wall at 170+ Ks an hour.

Cheers for the input

Amir

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lock bar doesn't prevent the outer tie rod ends from allowing slop. Worth a look. But HICAS problems are more likely to make a car feel left-right unsettled than up-down unsettled. Should be relatively easy to tell the difference at 160+.

Its an up and down rather than side-to-side movement.

Two Zimbabwe cents on flogged out rear struts.

uhhh what now?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nizmo man made a very small bet that the rear dampers are stuffed. This is certainly a possibility. I didn't go there in initially talking about your problems because I was willing to assume that if you had HSD coilovers then you'd probably know their condition. If that assumption is not valid......

Edited by GTSBoy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I see I see. Yes they could be stuffed. No, Im not 100% sure of condition. Will get in the garage over the next few days to do bits and pieces so will have a look. Anything in particular I should look for? Leaking oil etc?

Cheers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bahahaha.

Man, you said you have old JIC coilovers. They are usually pretty stiff (running 8+ kg/mm spring rates), so they may be what GTSBoy said in post #2. Coupled that with old, worn dampers, you'd get that bouncy feeling.

Get some MCA suspension ;).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share




  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Embrace the freedom of casual encounters on the best dating app in town! Verified Maidens Superlative Сasual Dating
    • Slimline sub on the rear parcel shelf is doable. Pioneer TS-WX140DA is only 70mm high.   
    • People like Johnny Dose Bro might be laughing at my post because I accidentally added 100mm to my numbers. 350-355 is indeed the lower limit. 450 is off-road Skyline spec.
    • What is the "compromise" that you think will happen? Are you thinking that something will get damaged? The only things you have to be concerned about with spherical jointed suspension arms are; Arguments with the constabulary wrt their legality (they are likely to be illegal for road use without an engineering certificatation, and that may not be possible to obtain). A lot more NVH transmitted through to the passengers (which is hardly a concern for those with a preference for good handling, anyway). Greatly increased inspection and maintenance requirements (see above points, both).   It is extremely necessary to ask what car you are talking about. Your discussion on strut tops, for example, would be completely wrong for an R chassis, but be correct for an S chassis. R32s have specific problems that R33/4 do not have. Etc. I have hardened rubber bushes on upper rear control arms and traction rods. Adjustable length so as to be able to set both camber and bump steer. You cannot contemplate doing just the control arms and not the traction arms. And whatever bushing you have in one you should have in the other so that they have similar characteristics. Otherwise you can get increased oddness of behaviour as one bushing flexes and the other doesn't, changing the alignment between them. I have stock lower rear arms with urethane bushes. I may make changes here, these are are driven by the R32's geometry problems, so I won't discuss them here unless it proves necessary. I have spherical joints in the front caster rods. I have experienced absolutely no negatives and only positives from doing so. They are massively better than any other option. I have sphericals in the FUCAs, but this is driven largely by the (again) R32 specific problems with the motion of those arms. I just have to deal with the increased maintenance required. Given how much better the front end behaves with the sphericals in there.....I'd probably be tempted to go away from my preference (which is not to have sphericals on a road car, for 2 of the 3 reasons in the bulleted list above), just to gain those improvements. And so my preference for not using sphericals (in general) on a road car should be obvious. I use them judiciously, though, as required to solve particular problems.
    • Easiest way to know is to break out the multimeter and measure it when cold, then measure all the resistances again once it gets hot enough to misfire. Both the original ignitor and the J Replace version. Factory service manual will have the spec for the terminal measurements.
×
×
  • Create New...