Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

http://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/419955-looks-like-garrett-slipped-another-gtx30-variant-in/page-19?hl=%2B3071#entry7448162

http://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/344089-garrett-medium-frame-gtx-turbos/page-58?hl=%2B3071#entry6324329

http://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/55845-rb25-turbo-upgrade-all-dyno-results/page-32?hl=%2B3071#entry5247046

http://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/43864-new-garrett-3071r-experiences/page-4?hl=3071#entry1653759

And this is just 4 threads of 23 pages of threads, the 3071 has been around for quite a few years and in many variants. If you did some reading you would see this and be able to make your own informed comparative decision.

Its not up to people on here to do your research, but you could ask for help finding specifics if you got stuck. But I would think about how you actually did that, your present approach is somewhat lacking.................

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/452858-3071r/#findComment-7463576
Share on other sites

I did look at that more specifically i was looking for dyno sheets. There is a difference with what people say and siting a dyno sheet. The only one that i could find that had a dynosheet only had the 3071 turbine so i would assume as a turbo newbie that it would be quite different to the one i have.

So in short i did do my research and couldnt find what i was after. This is why i posted here.....

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/452858-3071r/#findComment-7463581
Share on other sites

:banana:If you havnt bought the turbo yet, just play it safe and get a GT3076 0,82 its proven and will satisfy most.. end of story.. also sounds awesome .. just pick your rear housing for the desired power/response , jobs done..

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/452858-3071r/#findComment-7463945
Share on other sites

Heaps of threads with info like you just gave me you peanut. I am after info on rb25 which if you actually look at it there is not much...

You see up there on top of this forum there is a RB25 dyno thread right?

GOOD info on turbos is probably the most plentiful information on this forum. I know because I routinely use the search button.

Edited by Kanaric
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/452858-3071r/#findComment-7463985
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah i found that alot of parts can be wrong or "very" hard to get the real right one. I already bought some brakes years ago on me "old" GT calipers and they were wrong too 😄  I told them too. Even send them pictures...but they said "EBC catalogue has them on my car... So i dont know what their answer will be. I call monday them and let them know that they are really not on my car. If they were they would be already on a car...
    • Welcome to Skyline ownership. Yes, it is entirely possible parts websites get things wrong. There's a whole world of inaccuracies out there when it comes to R34 stuff (and probably 33 and 32). Lots of things that are 'just bolt on, entirely interchangable' aren't. Even between S1 and S2 R34's. Yes they have a GTT item supposedly being 296mm. This is incorrect. I would call whoever you got them from and return them and let them know the GTT actually uses 310mm rotors. Depending on where you got them from your experience and success will obviously vary.
    • Hi...a bit a "development" on the brakes. I spoke to the guys where i get brakes from...and they are saying that 296mm EBC are for R34 GT-T. I then went to their site: https://www.ebcbrakes.com/vehicle/uk-row/NISSAN/Skyline (R34)/ and search for my car(R34 GT 1998 - it has GTT brakes) and it show me this USR1229 number and they are rly 296mm rotors... So now iam rly confused... The rotors i have now on the car are 310mm asi shown... So where is the problem? Does the whole EBC got it wrong or my calipers are just...idk know what?  
    • Oh What the hell, I used to get a "are you sure you want to reply, this thread is XX months old" message. Maybe a software update remove that. My bad.
    • This is a recipe for disaster* Note: Disaster is relative. The thing that often gets lost in threads like this is what is considered acceptable poke and compromise between what one person considers 'good' looks and what someone else does. The quoted specs would sit absurdly outside the guards with the spacers mentioned and need  REALLY thin tyres and a LOT of camber AND rolling the guards to fit. Some people love this. Some people consider this a ruined car. One thing is for certain though, rolling the guards is pretty much mandatory for any 'good' fitment (of either variety). It is often the difference between any fitment remotely close to the guards. "Not to mention the rears were like a mm from hitting the coilovers." I have a question though - This spec is VERY close to what I was planning to buy relative to the inboard suspension - I have an offset measuring tool on the way to confirm it. When you say "like a mm" do you mean literally 1mm? Or 2mm? Cause that's enough clearance for me in the rear :p I actually found the more limiting factor ISNT the coilover but the actual suspension arms. Did you take a look at how close those were?
×
×
  • Create New...