Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Well I am looking forward to this season. Hopefully Porsche will be a little stronger but very keen to see what Nissan-Nismo have in store.

Also planning on going back to Le Mans this year. Just have to see how finances go as I may end up going to Japanese round instead later in the year

The first disappointment of 2015 are the spy pics of the Nissan GTR LM. Farking UGLY! :(

p5mtqwdfyrkpkyegcqg3.jpg

q5vlij98bigbkxt60ezd.jpg

Front engined?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/452932-wec-le-mans-2015/
Share on other sites

Well I am looking forward to this season. Hopefully Porsche will be a little stronger but very keen to see what Nissan-Nismo have in store.

Also planning on going back to Le Mans this year. Just have to see how finances go as I may end up going to Japanese round instead later in the year

The first disappointment of 2015 are the spy pics of the Nissan GTR LM. Farking UGLY! :(

p5mtqwdfyrkpkyegcqg3.jpg

q5vlij98bigbkxt60ezd.jpg

Front engined?

wow. talk about being beaten within an inch of it's life with the ugly stick.

  • 2 weeks later...

Not the prettiest thing

And sorry Nissan. Call me old fashioned but I nevber want to see a FWD car EVER WIN LE MANS!

1422841750.jpg

1422841776.jpg

Sorry Nissan. I hope it crashes and farking BURNS!

A FWD "GTR"? Now I've seen everything.

Here's hoping it's all in the name of development for the R36.

Nissan...I suppose you give your racing operations to the Poms you get awesome looking cars like this

1317101685546009836.jpg

Leave it up to the Nissan folk in Japan and you get their 2015 abomination

I have been doing some research for another holiday this year to include Le Mans again and after seeing this....um it certainly takes away the excitement I had for Nissan joining.

Oh well, still have the main game and that is the 3 car Porsche team.

I look at the Nissan range of cars now and just sigh. Nothing in their line up appeals to me. Their GTR race program was at least cool, even though they struggle in GT3 form they sounded and were awesome n GT1 guise up against the Maseratis, Ford GT, Lambos, Astons etc etc..

Oh well. At least I still have the 919 and the C7 Vette in GT :)

Apparently the electric side can send power the rear wheels?

Anyway, I reckon it's cool, different, "innovative" (some text here).

yeh, oddly if they chose to they can through about 560 diffs and shafts :)

I have wondered why a team has not done a backwards 919 with front engine and electric motors on rear wheels where you can really vector the torque for traction

yeh, oddly if they chose to they can through about 560 diffs and shafts :)

I have wondered why a team has not done a backwards 919 with front engine and electric motors on rear wheels where you can really vector the torque for traction

I agree, much easier to throw an electric motor or two on the rear axles.

I agree, much easier to throw an electric motor or two on the rear axles.

http://www.topgear.com/uk/car-news/nissan-gt-r-le-mans-car-2015-02-02

TG are claiming that the GTR LM has a 700hp electric motor in the back to boot giving it 1250hp when both are used.

If the car proves reliable it is definitely in the chance.

There was a time when Brendon Hartley was the golden boy of the Red Bull Young Driver Program. He got dumped when he simply couldn't consistently get the results to win a championship.

So interesting that Red Bull have stated sponsoring him again this year. So that puts two drivers in Porsche Car 20 as wearing Red Bull sponsorship

Nissan...I suppose you give your racing operations to the Poms you get awesome looking cars like this

1317101685546009836.jpg

Leave it up to the Nissan folk in Japan and you get their 2015 abomination

It's the seppos you need to blame. But I think it's cool to see some actual innovation in concept, packaging, drive configuration and aero instead of the usual cookie cutter "prototype" cars. Its a radical concept and the most interesting thing to come along in prototypes for a generation and all people can say is "it's not pretty" and "fwd is gay" - when it's awd anyway.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • Sorry I haven't been following all the detail, so you may have tried this. Does it idle with the tiniest bit of throttle you can add? You've mentioned the IACV, does it have an AAC valve and have you adjusted it at all (ie, screw the idle adjust screw all the way in, then back it out a couple of turns until idle is stable)?
    • My bad, I unplugged the one underlined in red instead of yellow before. With the car started, after unplugging the IACV (the one underlined in yellow), it idled at around 400/500 for 3 seconds before stalling. Attempting to start the car without the IACV will not start the car.   It does stutter and sputter for around 5 seconds before dying. However, immediately after starting it, you can already hear some slight sputters from the exhaust.   It won't start with the AFM unplugged. If it is when the car has already started, it stalls in a few seconds.   Yesterday, I did take some logs using Nistune of 3 scenarios. Car idling till it stalls Car idling and unplugging the IACV Car idling and removing the AFM I also have some previous logs of when the Car is idling till it stalls and when driving and it cuts. I am not really knowledgeable enough to understand what to look for. After every test, car idles rougher and rougher, until I have to stop. It will be fine the day after.
    • There is no difference between a 17x8 and an 18x8. The total diameter of the tyre needs to remain +/- the same (so you don't mess up the gearing, speedo reading, and clearance when turning front wheels..... so you just need to use a lower profile tyre on th 18 than you do on the 17. /rocket surgery.
    • I thought the same to start with. But then I thought it was one of those LCAs where the end of the ARB goes through a bushing in the LCA itself, instead of having an end link.
    • Yeah - I mean, go the other way. Smaller range. Not larger.
×
×
  • Create New...