Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

You can say the statement is shit all you like, but if you actually have a decent engine builder that checks the seat pressure you will find you can't get enough seat pressure without the creating a coil bind situation because they are made to soft from factory

You can say the statement is shit all you like, but if you actually have a decent engine builder that checks the seat pressure you will find you can't get enough seat pressure without the creating a coil bind situation because they are made to soft from factory

I agree but that's because you chose the wrong spring it's not japan's fault that the spring don't work it's yours.

your statement still makes no sense

Edited by mr skidz

we have all used different brand and model of springs and they all have the same issue, it's ok we've made the mistakes and are happy to pass on the information. If you still choose to buy them and then end up paying twice, I really don't care cause I've learnt from my mistakes and won't be making them again

Well since you're tomei springs were to soft what are they rated at and what were they measured at, tell me what the difference was because I have some here that I haven't used yet and I plan on checking them before installing them if you are correct then I will bow to your comment

Might have been 60 was 3 years ago, but you're welcome to ask Joey or piggaz about their experience with Japanese valve springs. Make sure you ask Joey tho cause his is definitely a story you'll want to hear

lol is that what you had before?

if so what rate springs did you settle for piggaz ?

That's what I installed, yes. I don't know how it got past me but when the stupid thing was carrying on like a two bob tart on the dyno I went and saw the bloke that put the engine together. That's what the seat pressures were. We

ripped them out and put in a camtech single spring and Ti retainer package (which fit SO much better then the previous stuff), put it back on the dyno and issue was gone.

19 psi, 6500 rpm it would float at. Go half throttle it would go to 8000, give it more boost and it would fluff around at 5000 rpm.

Best bit was the camtech package was so much cheaper than the jap stuff, fit as it should and did the job.

Never tested what the seat pressures were as the swap was done in the car. But it went onto hold 30 psi no problems.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
    • Yes they do. For some maybe. But for those used the most by abusers, ie Skylines, the numbers are known. The stock eyebrow height for R32/3 Skylines is about 365/375mm or thereabouts. The minimum such heights are recorded in adjacent columns in the database.
    • Hmmm, interesting. Makes me wonder whether there is bias as well. It's the cheapest fuel, so it is used for all kinds of ill-maintained shitboxes which are bound to have issues regardless. Nicer cars tend to require higher octane rated fuel and can't use it anyway. FWIW, the official NSW E10 facts page is decent. 
×
×
  • Create New...